Illinois Journal of Mathematics

Ideals generated by principal minors

Ashley K. Wheeler

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text

Abstract

A minor is principal means it is defined by the same row and column indices. We study ideals generated by principal minors of size $t\leq n$ of a generic $n\times n$ matrix $X$, in the polynomial ring generated over an algebraically closed field by the entries of $X$. When $t=2$ the resulting quotient ring is a normal complete intersection domain. We show for any $t$, upon inverting $\det X$ the ideals given respectively by the size $t$ and the size $n-t$ principal minors become isomorphic. From that we show the algebraic set given by the size $n-1$ principal minors has a codimension $4$ component defined by the determinantal ideal, plus a codimension $n$ component. When $n=4$ the two components are linked, and in fact, geometrically linked.

Article information

Source
Illinois J. Math., Volume 59, Number 3 (2015), 675-689.

Dates
Received: 1 January 2015
Revised: 28 March 2016
First available in Project Euclid: 30 September 2016

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ijm/1475266403

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1215/ijm/1475266403

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR3554228

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
1349.13030

Subjects
Primary: 13C40: Linkage, complete intersections and determinantal ideals [See also 14M06, 14M10, 14M12] 14M12: Determinantal varieties [See also 13C40]

Citation

Wheeler, Ashley K. Ideals generated by principal minors. Illinois J. Math. 59 (2015), no. 3, 675--689. doi:10.1215/ijm/1475266403. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ijm/1475266403


Export citation

References

  • V. Baranovsky, The variety of pairs of commuting nilpotent matrices is irreducible, Transform. Groups 6 (2001), no. 1, 3–8.
  • W. Bruns and J. Herzog, Cohen–Macaulay rings, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 39, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.
  • D. A. Buchsbaum and D. Eisenbud, Algebra structures for finite free resolutions, and some structure theorems for ideals of codimension $3$, Amer. J. Math. 99 (1977), no. 3, 447–485.
  • C. de Concini and C. Procesi, A characteristic free approach to invariant theory, Adv. Math. 21 (1976), no. 3, 330–354.
  • E. De Negri and E. Gorla, Invariants of ideals generated by Pfaffians, Commutative algebra and its connections to geometry, Contemp. Math., vol. 555, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2011, pp. 47–62.
  • P. Diaconis, D. Eisenbud and B. Sturmfels, Lattice walks and primary decomposition, Mathematical essays in honor of Gian-Carlo Rota (Cambridge, MA, 1996), Progr. Math., vol. 161, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1998, pp. 173–193.
  • J. A. Eagon, Ideals generated by the subdeterminants of a matrix, ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 1961. Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago.
  • J. A. Eagon and M. Hochster, Cohen–Macaulay rings, invariant theory, and the generic perfection of determinantal loci, Amer. J. Math. 93 (1971), no. 4, 1020–1058.
  • J. A. Eagon and D. G. Northcott, Ideals defined by matrices and a certain complex associated with them, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 269 (1962), 188–204.
  • V. Ene and A. A. Qureshi, Ideals generated by diagonal 2-minors, Comm. Algebra 41 (2013), no. 8, 3058–3066.
  • M. Gerstenhaber, On dominance and varieties of commuting matrices, Ann. of Math. (2) 73 (1961), 324–348.
  • S. R. Ghorpade and C. Krattenthaler, The Hilbert series of Pfaffian rings, Algebra, arithmetic and geometry with applications (West Lafayette, IN, 2000), Springer, Berlin, 2004, pp. 337–356.
  • K. Griffin and M. J. Tsatsomeros, Principal minors. II. The principal minor assignment problem, Linear Algebra Appl. 419 (2006), no. 1, 125–171.
  • J. Harris and L. W. Tu, On symmetric and skew-symmetric determinantal varieties, Topology 23 (1984), no. 1, 71–84.
  • M. Hochster, Rings of invariants of tori, Cohen–Macaulay rings generated by monomials, and polytopes, Ann. of Math. (2) 96 (1972), 318–337.
  • M. Hochster and C. Huneke, Tight closure, invariant theory, and the Briançon–Skoda theorem, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (1990), no. 1, 31–116.
  • M. Hochster and C. Huneke, Tight closure of parameter ideals and splitting in module-finite extensions, J. Algebraic Geom. 3 (1994), 599–670.
  • O. Holtz and B. Sturmfels, Hyperdeterminantal relations among symmetric principal minors, J. Algebra 316 (2007), no. 2, 634–648.
  • C. Huneke and B. Ulrich, The structure of linkage, Ann. of Math. (2) 126 (1987), no. 2, 277–334.
  • T. Józefiak and P. Pragacz, Ideals generated by Pfaffians, J. Algebra 61 (1979), 189–198.
  • H. Kleppe, Deformation of schemes by vanishing of Pfaffians, J. Algebra 53 (1978), 84–92.
  • H. Kleppe and D. Laksov, The algebraic structure and deformation of Pfaffian schemes, J. Algebra 64 (1980), no. 1, 167–189.
  • A. Knutson, Some schemes related to the commuting variety, J. Algebraic Geom. 14 (2005), no. 2, 283–294.
  • V. Kodiyalam, T. Y. Lam and R. G. Swan, Determinantal ideals, Pfaffian ideals, and the principal minor theorem, Noncommutative rings, group rings, diagram algebras and their applications, Contemp. Math., vol. 456, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2008, pp. 35–60.
  • P. A. MacMahon, A certain class of generating functions in the theory of numbers, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 185 (1894), 111–160.
  • E. Miller and B. Sturmfels, Combinatorial commutative algebra, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 227, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005.
  • C. C. Mueller, On the varieties of pairs of matrices whose product is symmetric, ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2007. Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan.
  • T. Muir, A treatise on the theory of determinants, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1960. Revised and enlarged by William H. Metzler.
  • L. Oeding, Set-theoretic defining equations of the tangential variety of the Segre variety, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 215 (2011), no. 6, 1516–1527.
  • L. Oeding, Set-theoretic defining equations of the variety of principal minors of symmetric matrices, Algebra Number Theory 5 (2011), no. 1, 75–109.
  • C. Peskine and L. Szpiro, Liaison des variétés algébriques. I, Invent. Math. 26 (1974), 271–302.
  • P. Pragacz, Characteristic free resolution of $n-2$-order Pfaffians of $n\times n$ antisymmetric matrix, J. Algebra 78 (1982), no. 2, 386–396.
  • R. W. Richardson, Commuting varieties of semisimple Lie algebras and algebraic groups, Compos. Math. 38 (1979), no. 3, 311–327.
  • T. G. Room, The geometry of determinantal loci, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1938.
  • D. W. Sharpe, On certain polynomial ideals defined by matrices, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 15 (1964), 155–175.
  • E. B. Stouffer, On the independence of principal minors of determinants, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 26 (1924), no. 3, 356–368.
  • E. B. Stouffer, Expressions for the general determinant in terms of its principal minors, Amer. Math. Monthly 35 (1928), no. 1, 18–21.
  • B. Sturmfels, Gröbner bases and convex polytopes, University Lecture Series, vol. 8, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1996.
  • T. Svanes, Coherent cohomology on Schubert subschemes of flag schemes and applications, Adv. Math. 14 (1974), 369–453.
  • H.-W. Young, Components of algebraic sets of commuting and nearly commuting matrices, ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2010. Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan.