Open Access
2011 Rigidity versus flexibility for tight confoliations
Thomas Vogel
Geom. Topol. 15(1): 41-121 (2011). DOI: 10.2140/gt.2011.15.41

Abstract

In their book "Confoliations" [Univ. Lecture Ser. 13, Amer. Math. Soc. (1998)], Y Eliashberg and W Thurston gave a definition of tight confoliations. We give an example of a tight confoliation ξ on T3 violating the Thurston–Bennequin inequalities. This answers a question from "Confoliations" negatively. Despite this, it is still possible to prove restrictions on homotopy classes of plane fields which contain tight confoliations.

The failure of the Thurston–Bennequin inequalities for tight confoliations is due to the presence of overtwisted stars. Overtwisted stars are particular configurations of Legendrian curves which bound a disc with finitely many punctures on the boundary. We prove that the Thurston–Bennequin inequalities hold for tight confoliations without overtwisted stars and that symplectically fillable confoliations do not admit overtwisted stars.

Citation

Download Citation

Thomas Vogel. "Rigidity versus flexibility for tight confoliations." Geom. Topol. 15 (1) 41 - 121, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2140/gt.2011.15.41

Information

Received: 30 March 2009; Revised: 16 June 2010; Accepted: 18 October 2010; Published: 2011
First available in Project Euclid: 20 December 2017

zbMATH: 1246.57071
MathSciNet: MR2764113
Digital Object Identifier: 10.2140/gt.2011.15.41

Subjects:
Primary: 57R17 , 57R30

Keywords: confoliation , tight

Rights: Copyright © 2011 Mathematical Sciences Publishers

Vol.15 • No. 1 • 2011
MSP
Back to Top