Geometry & Topology

Dominating surface group representations and deforming closed anti-de Sitter $3$–manifolds

Nicolas Tholozan

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

However, an active subscription may be available with MSP at

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text


Let S be a closed oriented surface of negative Euler characteristic and M a complete contractible Riemannian manifold. A Fuchsian representation j : π1(S) Isom+(2) strictly dominates a representation ρ: π1(S) Isom(M) if there exists a (j,ρ)–equivariant map from 2 to M that is λ–Lipschitz for some λ < 1. In a previous paper by Deroin and Tholozan, the authors construct a map Ψρ from the Teichmüller space T (S) of the surface S to itself and prove that, when M has sectional curvature at most 1, the image of Ψρ lies (almost always) in the domain Dom(ρ) of Fuchsian representations strictly dominating ρ. Here we prove that Ψρ: T (S) Dom(ρ) is a homeomorphism. As a consequence, we are able to describe the topology of the space of pairs of representations (j,ρ) from π1(S) to Isom+(2) with j Fuchsian strictly dominating ρ. In particular, we obtain that its connected components are classified by the Euler class of ρ. The link with anti-de Sitter geometry comes from a theorem of Kassel, stating that those pairs parametrize deformation spaces of anti-de Sitter structures on closed 3–manifolds.

Article information

Geom. Topol., Volume 21, Number 1 (2017), 193-214.

Received: 23 September 2014
Revised: 29 January 2016
Accepted: 29 February 2016
First available in Project Euclid: 16 November 2017

Permanent link to this document

Digital Object Identifier

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)

Zentralblatt MATH identifier

Primary: 57M50: Geometric structures on low-dimensional manifolds 58E20: Harmonic maps [See also 53C43], etc.
Secondary: 53C50: Lorentz manifolds, manifolds with indefinite metrics 32G15: Moduli of Riemann surfaces, Teichmüller theory [See also 14H15, 30Fxx]

anti-de Sitter representations of surface groups Teichmüller harmonic maps deformation space


Tholozan, Nicolas. Dominating surface group representations and deforming closed anti-de Sitter $3$–manifolds. Geom. Topol. 21 (2017), no. 1, 193--214. doi:10.2140/gt.2017.21.193.

Export citation


  • T Barbot, F Bonsante, J Danciger, W M Goldman, F Guéritaud, F Kassel, K Krasnov, J-M Schlenker, A Zeghib, Some open questions on anti-de Sitter geometry, preprint (2012)
  • Y Carrière, Autour de la conjecture de L Markus sur les variétés affines, Invent. Math. 95 (1989) 615–628
  • K Corlette, Flat $G$–bundles with canonical metrics, J. Differential Geom. 28 (1988) 361–382
  • J Danciger, Ideal triangulations and geometric transitions, J. Topol. 7 (2014) 1118–1154
  • G D Daskalopoulos, R A Wentworth, Harmonic maps and Teichmüller theory, from “Handbook of Teichmüller theory, I”, IRMA Lect. Math. Theor. Phys. 11, Eur. Math. Soc., Zürich (2007) 33–109
  • B Deroin, N Tholozan, Dominating surface group representations by Fuchsian ones, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2016 (2016) 4145–4166
  • S K Donaldson, Twisted harmonic maps and the self-duality equations, Proc. London Math. Soc. 55 (1987) 127–131
  • J Eells, Jr, J H Sampson, Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds, Amer. J. Math. 86 (1964) 109–160
  • W M Goldman, Discontinuous groups and the Euler class, PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley (1980) Available at \setbox0\makeatletter\@url {\unhbox0
  • W M Goldman, Nonstandard Lorentz space forms, J. Differential Geom. 21 (1985) 301–308
  • F Guéritaud, F Kassel, Maximally stretched laminations on geometrically finite hyperbolic manifolds, preprint (2013) To appear in Geom. Topol.
  • F Guéritaud, F Kassel, M Wolff, Compact anti–de Sitter $3$–manifolds and folded hyperbolic structures on surfaces, Pacific J. Math. 275 (2015) 325–359
  • N J Hitchin, The self-duality equations on a Riemann surface, Proc. London Math. Soc. 55 (1987) 59–126
  • F Kassel, Quotients compacts d'espaces homogènes réels ou $p$–adiques, PhD thesis, Université Paris-Sud 11 (2009) Available at \setbox0\makeatletter\@url http://www.math.univ-lille/~kassel/ {\unhbox0
  • B Klingler, Complétude des variétés lorentziennes à courbure constante, Math. Ann. 306 (1996) 353–370
  • R S Kulkarni, F Raymond, $3$–dimensional Lorentz space-forms and Seifert fiber spaces, J. Differential Geom. 21 (1985) 231–268
  • F Labourie, Existence d'applications harmoniques tordues à valeurs dans les variétés à courbure négative, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 111 (1991) 877–882
  • F Salein, Variétés anti-de Sitter de dimension $3$ exotiques, Ann. Inst. Fourier $($Grenoble$)$ 50 (2000) 257–284
  • J H Sampson, Some properties and applications of harmonic mappings, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 11 (1978) 211–228
  • R Schoen, S T Yau, On univalent harmonic maps between surfaces, Invent. Math. 44 (1978) 265–278
  • N Tholozan, Uniformisation des variétés pseudo-riemanniennes localement homogènes, PhD thesis, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis (2014) Available at \setbox0\makeatletter\@url {\unhbox0
  • W P Thurston, Minimal stretch maps between hyperbolic surfaces, preprint (1986)
  • A J Tromba, Teichmüller theory in Riemannian geometry, Birkhäuser, Basel (1992)
  • R A Wentworth, Energy of harmonic maps and Gardiner's formula, from “In the tradition of Ahlfors–Bers, IV” (D Canary, J Gilman, J Heinonen, H Masur, editors), Contemp. Math. 432, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI (2007) 221–229
  • M Wolf, The Teichmüller theory of harmonic maps, J. Differential Geom. 29 (1989) 449–479
  • S A Wolpert, Geodesic length functions and the Nielsen problem, J. Differential Geom. 25 (1987) 275–296