Project Euclid

References

• Andersen, T. G. and Bollerslev, T. (1998). Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts., International Economic Review, 39:885–905.
• Andrews, D. (1994). Empirical process methods in econometrics. In Engle, R. and McFadden, D., editors, Handbook of Econometrics, volume 4, chapter 37, pages 2247–2294. Elsevier.
• Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M., and Heath, D. (1999). Coherent measures of risk., Mathematical Finance, 9(3):203–228.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0980.91042
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1111/1467-9965.00068
  
• Barendse, S. (2017). Interquantile expectation regression. Available at, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2937665.
• Basel Committee (2016). Minimum capital requirements for market risk. Technical report, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Available at, http://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d352.pdf.
• Bayer, S. (2018). Combining value-at-risk forecasts using penalized quantile regressions., Econometrics and Statistics, 8:56–77.
• Bayer, S. and Dimitriadis, T. (2019). Regression based expected shortfall backtesting., arXiv:1801.04112 [q-fin.RM].
• Bayer, S. and Dimitriadis, T. (2019)., esreg: Joint Quantile and Expected Shortfall Regression. R package version 0.4.0, available at https://cran.r-project.org/package=esreg.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 07080063
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/19-EJS1560
  
• Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity., Journal of Econometrics, 31(3):307–327.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0616.62119
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
  
• Brazauskas, V., Jones, B. L., Puri, M. L., and Zitikis, R. (2008). Estimating conditional tail expectation with actuarial applications in view., Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 138(11):3590–3604.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1152.62027
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2005.11.011
  
• Chao, W., Gerlach, R., and Chen, Q. (2018). A semi-parametric realized joint value-at-risk and expected shortfall regression framework., arXiv:1807.02422 [q-fin.RM].
• Chen, S. X. (2008). Nonparametric estimation of expected shortfall., Journal of Financial Econometrics, 6(1):87–107.
• Chernozhukov, V. and Umantsev, L. (2001). Conditional value-at-risk: Aspects of modeling and estimation., Empirical Economics, 26(1):271–292.
• Corsi, F. (2009). A simple approximate long-memory model of realized volatility., Journal of Financial Econometrics, 7(2):174–196.
• Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife., The Annals of Statistics, 7(1):1–26.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0406.62024
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1176344552
  Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1176344552
  
• Efron, B. (1991). Regression percentiles using asymmetric squared error loss., Statistica Sinica, 1:93–125.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0822.62054
  
• Ehm, W., Gneiting, T., Jordan, A., and Krüger, F. (2016). Of quantiles and expectiles: consistent scoring functions, choquet representations and forecast rankings., Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 78(3):505–562.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 07064964
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1111/rssb.12154
  
• Engle, R. and Manganelli, S. (2004). CAViaR: Conditional autoregressive value at risk by regression quantiles., Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 22(4):367–381.
• Fissler, T. (2017)., On Higher Order Elicitability and Some Limit Theorems on the Poisson and Wiener Space. PhD thesis, Universität Bern.
• Fissler, T. and Ziegel, J. F. (2016). Higher order elicitability and Osband’s principle., Annals of Statistics, 44(4):1680–1707.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1355.62006
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/16-AOS1439
  Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1467894712
  
• Fissler, T., Ziegel, J. F., and Gneiting, T. (2016). Expected shortfall is jointly elicitable with value at risk – implications for backtesting., Risk Magazine, Janaury 2016.
• Gaglianone, W. P., Lima, L. R., Linton, O., and Smith, D. R. (2011). Evaluating value-at-risk models via quantile regression., Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 29(1):150–160.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1209.91178
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1198/jbes.2010.07318
  
• Giacomini, R. and Komunjer, I. (2005). Evaluation and combination of conditional quantile forecasts., Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 23:416–431.
• Gikhman, I. and Skorokhod, A. (2004)., The Theory of Stochastic Processes I, volume 210 of Classics in Mathematics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2058259
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1068.60004
  
• Gneiting, T. (2011). Making and evaluating point forecasts., Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106(494):746–762.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1232.62028
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1198/jasa.2011.r10138
  
• Gourieroux, C. and Monfort, A. (1995)., Statistics and Econometric Models: Volume 1, General Concepts, Estimation, Prediction and Algorithms. Cambridge University Press.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0870.62088
  
• Gourieroux, C., Monfort, A., and Trognon, A. (1984). Pseudo maximum likelihood methods: Theory., Econometrica, 52(3):681–700.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0575.62031
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/1913471
  
• Halbleib, R. and Pohlmeier, W. (2012). Improving the value at risk forecasts: Theory and evidence from the financial crisis., Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36(8):1212–1228.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1345.91084
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2011.10.005
  
• Hall, P. and Sheather, S. J. (1988). On the distribution of a studentized quantile., Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 50(3):381–391.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0674.62034
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1988.tb01735.x
  
• Hansen, P. R., Lunde, A., and Nason, J. M. (2011). The model confidence set., Econometrica, 79(2):453–497.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1210.62030
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.3982/ECTA5771
  
• Heber, G., Lunde, A., Shephard, N., and Sheppard, K. (2009)., Oxford-Man Institute’s realized library, version 0.3. Oxford-Man Institute, University of Oxford.
• Hendricks, W. and Koenker, R. (1992). Hierarchical spline models for conditional quantiles and the demand for electricity., Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(417):58–68.
• Huber, P. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In, Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pages 221–233. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Koenker, R. (1994). Confidence intervals for regression quantiles. In Mandl, P. and Hušková, M., editors, Asymptotic Statistics: Proceedings of the Fifth Prague Symposium, held from September 4–9, 1993, pages 349–359. Physica-Verlag Heidelberg.
• Koenker, R. (2005)., Quantile Regression. Econometric Society Monographs. Cambridge University Press.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1111.62037
  
• Koenker, R. and Machado, J. A. F. (1999). Goodness of fit and related inference processes for quantile regression., Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(448):1296–1310.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0998.62041
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10473882
  
• Koenker, R. and Xiao, Z. (2006). Quantile autoregression., Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101(475):980–990.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1120.62326
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1198/016214506000000672
  
• Komunjer, I. (2013). Quantile prediction. In, Handbook of Economic Forecasting, volume 2, chapter 17, pages 961–994. Elsevier.
• Komunjer, I. and Vuong, Q. (2010). Semiparametric efficiency bound in time-series models for conditional quantiles., Econometric Theory, 26(02):383–405.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1185.62156
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1017/S0266466609100038
  
• Lambert, N. S., Pennock, D. M., and Shoham, Y. (2008). Eliciting properties of probability distributions. In, Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pages 129–138. ACM.
• Lourenço, H. R., Martin, O. C., and Stützle, T. (2003). Iterated local search. In Glover, F. and Kochenberger, G. A., editors, Handbook of Metaheuristics, pages 320–353. Springer US, Boston, MA.
• Nadarajah, S., Zhang, B., and Chan, S. (2014). Estimation methods for expected shortfall., Quantitative Finance, 14(2):271–291.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR3175984
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1294.91196
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1080/14697688.2013.816767
  
• Nelder, J. A. and Mead, R. (1965). A simplex method for function minimization., The Computer Journal, 7(4):308–313.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0229.65053
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308
  
• Newey, W. and McFadden, D. (1994). Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing. In Engle, R. and McFadden, D., editors, Handbook of Econometrics, volume 4, chapter 36, pages 2111–2245. Elsevier.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1315971
  
• Nolde, N. and Ziegel, J. F. (2017). Elicitability and backtesting: Perspectives for banking regulation., The Annals of Applied Statistics, 11(4):1833–1874.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1383.62247
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/17-AOAS1041
  Project Euclid: euclid.aoas/1514430265
  
• Patton, A. J., Ziegel, J. F., and Chen, R. (2019). Dynamic semiparametric models for expected shortfall (and value-at-risk)., Forthcoming in Journal of Econometrics.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 07075185
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.10.008
  
• Taylor, J. W. (2008a). Estimating value at risk and expected shortfall using expectiles., Journal of Financial Econometrics, 6(2):231–252.
• Taylor, J. W. (2008b). Using exponentially weighted quantile regression to estimate value at risk and expected shortfall., Journal of Financial Econometrics, 6(3):382–406.
• Taylor, J. W. (2019). Forecasting value at risk and expected shortfall using a semiparametric approach based on the asymmetric laplace distribution., Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 37:1, 121–133.
• Timmermann, A. (2006). Forecast combinations. In Elliott, G., Granger, C. W., and Timmermann, A., editors, Handbook of Economic Forecasting, volume 1, chapter 4, pages 135–196. Elsevier.
• van der Vaart, A. W. (1998)., Asymptotic statistics. Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge University Press.
• Žikeš, F. and Baruník, J. (2016). Semi-parametric conditional quantile models for financial returns and realized volatility., Journal of Financial Econometrics, 14(1):185–226.
• Weber, S. (2006). Distribution invariant risk measures, information, and dynamic consistency., Mathematical Finance, 16(2):419–441.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1145.91037
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1111/j.1467-9965.2006.00277.x
  
• Xiao, Z., Guo, H., and Lam, M. S. (2015). Quantile regression and value at risk. In Lee, C.-F. and Lee, J. C., editors, Handbook of Financial Econometrics and Statistics, pages 1143–1167. Springer.
• Ziegel, J. F., Krüger, F., Jordan, A., and Fasciati, F. (2019). Robust Forecast Evaluation of Expected Shortfall., Journal of Financial Econometrics.
• Zwingmann, T. and Holzmann, H. (2016). Asymptotics for the expected shortfall., arXiv:1611.07222 [math.ST].