## Electronic Journal of Probability

### The branching-ruin number as critical parameter of random processes on trees

#### Abstract

The branching-ruin number of a tree, which describes its asymptotic growth and geometry, can be seen as a polynomial version of the branching number. This quantity was defined by Collevecchio, Kious and Sidoravicius (2018) in order to understand the phase transitions of the once-reinforced random walk (ORRW) on trees. Strikingly, this number was proved to be equal to the critical parameter of ORRW on trees.

In this paper, we continue the investigation of the link between the branching-ruin number and the criticality of random processes on trees.

First, we study random walks on random conductances on trees, when the conductances have an heavy tail at $0$, parametrized by some $p>1$, where $1/p$ is the exponent of the tail. We prove a phase transition recurrence/transience with respect to $p$ and identify the critical parameter to be equal to the branching-ruin number of the tree.

Second, we study a multi-excited random walk on trees where each vertex has $M$ cookies and each cookie has an infinite strength towards the root. Here again, we prove a phase transition recurrence/transience and identify the critical number of cookies to be equal to the branching-ruin number of the tree, minus 1. This result extends a conjecture of Volkov (2003). Besides, we study a generalized version of this process and generalize results of Basdevant and Singh (2009).

#### Article information

Source
Electron. J. Probab., Volume 24 (2019), paper no. 121, 29 pp.

Dates
Accepted: 27 October 2019
First available in Project Euclid: 6 November 2019

https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ejp/1573030842

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1214/19-EJP383

#### Citation

Collevecchio, Andrea; Huynh, Cong Bang; Kious, Daniel. The branching-ruin number as critical parameter of random processes on trees. Electron. J. Probab. 24 (2019), paper no. 121, 29 pp. doi:10.1214/19-EJP383. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ejp/1573030842

#### References

• [1] Amir, G., Benjamini, I. and Kozma, G. (2008). Excited random walk against a wall. Probability Theory and Related Fields 140(1-2), 83–102.
• [2] Basdevant, A.-L. and Singh, A. (2009). Recurrence and transience of a multi-excited random walk on a regular tree. Electron. J. Probab. 14(55), 1628–1669.
• [3] Benjamini, I. and Wilson, D. (2003). Excited random walk. Electro. Commun. Probab. 8(9), 86–92.
• [4] Bérard, J. and Ramírez, A. (2007). Central limit theorem for the excited random walk in dimension $d\geq 2$. Electron. Commun. Probab. 12(30), 303–314.
• [5] Collevecchio, A. (2006). On the transience of processes defined on Galton-Watson trees. Ann. Probab. 34(3), 870–878.
• [6] Collevecchio, A. and Barbour, A. (2017). General random walk in a random environment defined on Galton–Watson trees. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Statist., to appear.
• [7] Collevecchio, A., Holmes, M. and Kious, D. (2018). On the speed of once-reinforced biased random walk on trees. Electron. J. Probab., 23, paper no. 86.
• [8] Collevecchio, A., Kious, D. and Sidoravicius, V. (2018). The branching-ruin number and the critical parameter of once-reinforced random walk on trees. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, to appear. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21860.
• [9] Davis, B. (1990). Reinforced random walk. Probability Theory and Related Fields 84, 203–229.
• [10] Enriquez, N., Sabot, C. and Zindy, O. (2009). Limit laws for transient random walks in random environment on $\mathbb{Z}$. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 59(6), 2469–2508.
• [11] Enriquez, N., Sabot, C. and Zindy, O. (2007). A probabilistic representation of constants in Kesten’s renewal theorem. Probab. Theory Related Fields 144, 581–613.
• [12] Enriquez, N., Sabot, C. and Zindy, O. (2007). Limit laws for transient random walks in random environment on $\mathbb{Z}$. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 59, 2469–2508.
• [13] Fontes, L. R. G., Isopi, M. and Newman, C. M. (2002). Random walks with strongly inhomogeneous rates and singular diffusions: convergence, localization and aging in one dimension. Ann. Probab. 30(2), 579–604.
• [14] Fribergh, A. and Kious, D. (2018). Scaling limits for sub-ballistic biased random walks in random conductances. Ann. Probab. 46(2), 605–686.
• [15] Furstenberg, H. (1970). Intersections of Cantor sets and transversality of semigroups. In Gunning, R. C., editor, Problems in Analysis, pages 41–59. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. A symposium in honor of Salomon Bochner, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 1–3 April 1969..
• [16] Kious, D. and Sidoravicius, V. (2016). Phase transition for the Once-reinforced random walk on $\mathbb{Z} ^{d}$-like trees. Ann. Probab., to appear. arXiv:1604.07631 [math.PR].
• [17] Kozma, G. (2003). Excited random walk in three dimensions has positive speed. Preprint, arXiv:math/0310305.
• [18] Kozma, G. (2005). Excited random walk in two dimensions has linear speed. Preprint, arXiv:math/0512535.
• [19] Lyons, R. (1990). Random walks and percolation on trees. Ann. Probab. 18(3), 931–958.
• [20] Lyons, R. and Pemantle, R. (1992). Random walk in a random environment and first-passage percolation on trees. Ann. Probab. 20(1), 125–136.
• [21] Lyons, R. and Peres Y. (2016). Probability on Trees and Networks. Cambridge University Press, New York. Pages xvi+699. Available at http://pages.iu.edu/ rdlyons/.
• [22] Pemantle, R. (1988). Phase transition in reinforced random walk and RWRE on trees. Ann. Probab. 16, 1229–1241.
• [23] Pemantle, R. and Peres, Y. (1995). Critical random walk in random environment on trees. Ann. Probab. 23(1), 105–140.
• [24] Van der Hofstad, R. and Holmes, M. (2010). Monotonicity for excited random walk in high dimensions. Probability Theory and Related Fields 147(1-2), 333–348.
• [25] Volkov, S. (2003). Excited random walk on trees. Electron. J. Probab. 8(23).
• [26] Zerner, M. P. W. (2005). Multi-excited random walks on integers. Probability Theory and Related Fields 133(10), 98–122.
• [27] Zerner, M. (2006). Recurrence and transience of excited random walks on $\mathbb{Z} ^{d}$ and strips. Electron. Commun. Probab. 11(12), 118–128.