Electronic Communications in Probability

Erratum: A note on Kesten's Choquet-Deny lemma

Sebastian Mentemeier

Full-text: Open access

Abstract

This is an erratum for ECP volume 18 paper 65 (2013). In Proposition 3.1, Condition (C) does not imply that the set Λ(Γ) generates a dense subgroup of R. This has to be made an assumption. Alternatively, one can assume that the matrices are invertible.

Article information

Source
Electron. Commun. Probab., Volume 19 (2014), paper no. 20, 2 pp.

Dates
Accepted: 19 March 2014
First available in Project Euclid: 7 June 2016

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ecp/1465316722

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1214/ECP.v19-3381

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR3183573

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
1334.60138

Rights
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Citation

Mentemeier, Sebastian. Erratum: A note on Kesten's Choquet-Deny lemma. Electron. Commun. Probab. 19 (2014), paper no. 20, 2 pp. doi:10.1214/ECP.v19-3381. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ecp/1465316722


Export citation

References

  • D. Buraczewski, E. Damek and Y. Guivarc'h, On multidimensional Mandelbrot's cascades, ArXiv e-prints, (2011). arXiv:1109.1845v1
  • D. Buraczewski, E. Damek, Y. Guivarc'h and S. Mentemeier, On multidimensional Mandelbrot's cascades (2014). arXiv:1109.1845v2
  • Kesten, Harry. Random difference equations and renewal theory for products of random matrices. Acta Math. 131 (1973), 207–248.
  • Mentemeier, Sebastian. A note on Kesten's Choquet-Deny lemma. Electron. Commun. Probab. 18 (2013), no. 65, 7 pp.