Electronic Communications in Probability

Survival and extinction of caring double-branching annihilating random walk

Jochen Blath and Noemi Kurt

Full-text: Open access

Abstract

Branching annihilating random walk (BARW) is a generic term for a class of interacting particle systems on $\mathbb{Z}^d$ in which, as time evolves, particles execute random walks, produce offspring (on neighbouring sites) and (instantaneously) disappear when they meet other particles. Much of the interest in such models stems from the fact that they typically lack a monotonicity property called attractiveness, which in general makes them exceptionally hard to analyse and in particular highly sensitive in their qualitative long-time behaviour to even slight alterations of the branching and annihilation mechanisms. In this short note, we introduce so-called caring double-branching annihilating random walk (cDBARW) on $\mathbb{Z}$, and investigate its long-time behaviour. It turns out that it either allows survival with positive probability if the branching rate is greater than $1/2$, or a.s. extinction if the branching rate is smaller than $1/3$ and (additionally) branchings are only admitted for particles which have at least one neighbouring particle (so-called 'cooperative branching'). Further, we show a.s. extinction for all branching rates for a variant of this model, where branching is only allowed if offspring can be placed at odd distance between each other. It is the latter (extinction-type) results which seem remarkable, since they appear to hint at a general extinction result for a non-trivial parameter range in the so-called 'parity-preserving universality class', suggesting the existence of a 'true' phase transition. The rigorous proof of such a non-trivial phase transition remains a particularly challenging open problem.

Article information

Source
Electron. Commun. Probab. Volume 16 (2011), paper no. 26, 271-282.

Dates
Accepted: 23 May 2011
First available in Project Euclid: 7 June 2016

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ecp/1465261982

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1214/ECP.v16-1631

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR2802043

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
1225.60149

Subjects
Primary: 60K35: Interacting random processes; statistical mechanics type models; percolation theory [See also 82B43, 82C43]
Secondary: 60J80: Branching processes (Galton-Watson, birth-and-death, etc.) 60J27: Continuous-time Markov processes on discrete state spaces

Keywords
Branching Annihilating Random Walk extinction survival interface duality swapping voter model

Rights
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Citation

Blath, Jochen; Kurt, Noemi. Survival and extinction of caring double-branching annihilating random walk. Electron. Commun. Probab. 16 (2011), paper no. 26, 271--282. doi:10.1214/ECP.v16-1631. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ecp/1465261982


Export citation

References

  • J. Blath, A.M. Etheridge and M. Meredith. Coexistence in competing populations and branching annihilating random walk. Ann. Appl. Probab. 17, no.5/6 (2007), 1474–1507.
  • M. Bramson, L. Gray. The survival of branching annihilating random walk. Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete 68, no. 4 (1985), 447–460.
  • J. Cardy, U. Täuber. Theory of branching and annihilating random walk. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996), 4780–4783.
  • J. Cardy, U. Täuber. Field theory of branching and annihilating random walk. J. Stat. Phys. 90 (1998), 1–56.
  • D. Griffeath. Additive and Cancellative Interacting Particle Systems. Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics (1979).
  • A. Sudbury. The branching annihilating process: an interacting particle system. Ann. Probab. 18, no. 2 (1990), 581–601.
  • A. Sturm, J. Swart. Voter models with heterozygosity selection. Ann. Appl. Probab. 18, no. 1 (2008), 59–99.
  • J. Swart, K. Vrbenský. Numerical analysis of the rebellious voter model. AJ. Stat. Phys 140, no. 5 (2010), 873–899.