Bulletin of Symbolic Logic
- Bull. Symbolic Logic
- Volume 17, Issue 3 (2011), 337-360.
V = L and intuitive plausibility in set theory. A case study
What counts as an intuitively plausible set theoretic content (notion, axiom or theorem) has been a matter of much debate in contemporary philosophy of mathematics. In this paper I develop a critical appraisal of the issue. I analyze first R. B. Jensen's positions on the epistemic status of the axiom of constructibility. I then formulate and discuss a view of intuitiveness in set theory that assumes it to hinge basically on mathematical success. At the same time, I present accounts of set theoretic axioms and theorems formulated in non-strictly mathematical terms, e.g., by appealing to the iterative concept of set and/or to overall methodological principles, like unify and maximize, and investigate the relation of the latter to success in mathematics.
Bull. Symbolic Logic Volume 17, Issue 3 (2011), 337-360.
First available in Project Euclid: 6 July 2011
Permanent link to this document
Digital Object Identifier
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
Zentralblatt MATH identifier
Arrigoni, Tatiana. V = L and intuitive plausibility in set theory. A case study. Bull. Symbolic Logic 17 (2011), no. 3, 337--360. doi:10.2178/bsl/1309952317. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bsl/1309952317