September 2004 Forcing in proof theory
Jeremy Avigad
Bull. Symbolic Logic 10(3): 305-333 (September 2004). DOI: 10.2178/bsl/1102022660

Abstract

Paul Cohen's method of forcing, together with Saul Kripke's related semantics for modal and intuitionistic logic, has had profound effects on a number of branches of mathematical logic, from set theory and model theory to constructive and categorical logic. Here, I argue that forcing also has a place in traditional Hilbert-style proof theory, where the goal is to formalize portions of ordinary mathematics in restricted axiomatic theories, and study those theories in constructive or syntactic terms. I will discuss the aspects of forcing that are useful in this respect, and some sample applications. The latter include ways of obtaining conservation results for classical and intuitionistic theories, interpreting classical theories in constructive ones, and constructivizing model-theoretic arguments.

Citation

Download Citation

Jeremy Avigad. "Forcing in proof theory." Bull. Symbolic Logic 10 (3) 305 - 333, September 2004. https://doi.org/10.2178/bsl/1102022660

Information

Published: September 2004
First available in Project Euclid: 2 December 2004

zbMATH: 1064.03034
MathSciNet: MR2083287
Digital Object Identifier: 10.2178/bsl/1102022660

Rights: Copyright © 2004 Association for Symbolic Logic

JOURNAL ARTICLE
29 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

Vol.10 • No. 3 • September 2004
Back to Top