Bayesian Analysis

Bayesian Model Selection of Regular Vine Copulas

Lutz F. Gruber and Claudia Czado

Full-text: Open access


Regular vine copulas are a flexible class of dependence models, but Bayesian methodology for model selection and inference is not yet fully developed. We propose sparsity-inducing but otherwise non-informative priors, and present novel proposals to enable reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo posterior simulation for Bayesian model selection and inference. Our method is the first to jointly estimate the posterior distribution of all trees of a regular vine copula. This represents a substantial improvement over existing frequentist and Bayesian strategies, which can only select one tree at a time and are known to induce bias. A simulation study demonstrates the feasibility of our strategy and shows that it combines superior selection and reduced computation time compared to Bayesian tree-by-tree selection. In a real data example, we forecast the daily expected tail loss of a portfolio of nine exchange-traded funds using a fully Bayesian multivariate dynamic model built around Bayesian regular vine copulas to illustrate our model’s viability for financial analysis and risk estimation.

Article information

Bayesian Anal., Volume 13, Number 4 (2018), 1111-1135.

First available in Project Euclid: 29 December 2017

Permanent link to this document

Digital Object Identifier

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)

multivariate analysis dependence modeling copula modeling vine copulas Bayesian inference posterior simulation importance sampling simulation studies financial analysis risk forecasting

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Gruber, Lutz F.; Czado, Claudia. Bayesian Model Selection of Regular Vine Copulas. Bayesian Anal. 13 (2018), no. 4, 1111--1135. doi:10.1214/17-BA1089.

Export citation


  • Acerbi, C. and Tasche, D. (2003). “Expected Shortfall: A Natural Coherent Alternative to Value at Risk.” Economic Notes, 31: 379–388.
  • Bedford, T. and Cooke, R. M. (2001). “Probability Density Decomposition for Conditionally Dependent Random Variables Modeled by Vines.” Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 32: 245–268.
  • Brechmann, E. C., Czado, C., and Aas, K. (2012). “Truncated regular vines in high dimensions with application to financial data.” Canadian Journal of Statistics, 40(1): 68–85.
  • Brechmann, E. C. and Schepsmeier, U. (2013). “Modeling Dependence with C- and D-Vine Copulas: The R Package CDVine.” Journal of Statistical Software, 52(3): 1–27. URL
  • Dißmann, J. F., Brechmann, E. C., Czado, C., and Kurowicka, D. (2013). “Selecting and estimating regular vine copulae and application to financial returns.” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 59(1): 52–69.
  • Green, P. J. (1995). “Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination.” Biometrika, 82: 711–732.
  • Gruber, L. F. and Czado, C. (2015). “Sequential Bayesian Model Selection of Regular Vine Copulas.” Bayesian Analysis, 10(4): 937–963. URL
  • Gruber, L. F. and Czado, C. (2017). “Supplementary Appendix of Bayesian Model Selection of Regular Vine Copulas.” Bayesian Analysis.
  • Hastings, W. K. (1970). “Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications.” Biometrika, 57: 97–109.
  • Hoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E., and Volinsky, C. T. (1990). “Bayesian Model Averaging: A Tutorial.” Statistical Science, 14(4): 382–417.
  • Joe, H. (1996). “Families of $m$-variate distributions with given margins and $m(m-1)/2$ bivariate dependence parameters.” Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, 28: 120–141.
  • Joe, H. (2001). Multivariate Models and Dependence Concepts. Chapman & Hall.
  • Kim, D., Kim, J.-M., Liao, S.-M., and Jung, Y.-S. (2013). “Mixture of D-vine copulas for modeling dependence.” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 64: 1–19.
  • Kurowicka, D. and Cooke, R. M. (2006). Uncertainty Analysis with High Dimensional Dependence Modelling. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  • Kurowicka, D. and Joe, H. (eds.) (2010). Dependence Modeling: Vine Copula Handbook. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
  • McNeil, A. J., Frey, R., and Embrechts, P. (2005). Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques, and Tools. Princeton University Press.
  • Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., and Teller, E. (1953). “Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines.” Journal of Chemical Physics, 21: 1087–1092.
  • Min, A. and Czado, C. (2010). “Bayesian Inference for Multivariate Copulas Using Pair-Copula Constructions.” Journal of Financial Econometrics, 8(4): 511–546.
  • Min, A. and Czado, C. (2011). “Bayesian model selection for D-vine pair-copula constructions.” Canadian Journal of Statistics, 39(2): 239–258.
  • Morales-Napoles, O. (2011). “Counting vines.” In Kurowicka, D. and Joe, H. (eds.), Dependence Modeling: Vine Copula Handbook. World Scientific Publishing Co.
  • Nelsen, R. B. (2006). An Introduction to Copulas. Springer.
  • Prado, R. and West, M. (2010). Time Series: Modelling, Computation & Inference. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press. URL
  • Schamberger, B., Gruber, L. F., and Czado, C. (2017). “Bayesian Inference for Latent Factor Copulas and Application to Financial Risk Forecasting.” Econometrics, 5(21).
  • Sklar, A. (1959). “Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges.” Publications de l’Institut de Statistique de l’Université de Paris, 8: 229–231.
  • Smith, M., Min, A., Almeida, C., and Czado, C. (2010). “Modeling Longitudinal Data Using a Pair-Copula Decomposition of Serial Dependence.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(492): 1467–1479.
  • Stöber, J., Joe, H., and Czado, C. (2013). “Simplified Pair Copula Constructions-Limitations and Extensions.” Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 119(0): 101–118.
  • West, M. and Harrison, J. (1997). Bayesian Forecasting & Dynamic Models. Springer Verlag, 2nd edition. URL

Supplemental materials