Bayesian Analysis

Bayesian Inference for Partially Observed Multiplicative Intensity Processes

Sophie Donnet and Judith Rousseau

Full-text: Open access

Abstract

Poisson processes are used in various applications. In their homogeneous version, the intensity process is a deterministic constant whereas it depends on time in their inhomogeneous version. To allow for an endogenous evolution of the intensity process, we consider multiplicative intensity processes. Inference methods for such processes have been developed when the trajectories are fully observed, that is to say, when both the sizes of the jumps and the jumps instants are observed. In this paper, we deal with the case of a partially observed process: we assume that the jumps sizes are non- or partially observed whereas the time events are fully observed. Moreover, we consider the case where the initial state of the process at time 0 is unknown. The inference being strongly influenced by this quantity, we propose a sensible prior distribution on the initial state, using the probabilistic properties of the process. We illustrate the performances of our methodology on a large simulation study.

Article information

Source
Bayesian Anal. Volume 11, Number 1 (2016), 151-190.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 4 March 2015

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ba/1425492492

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1214/15-BA940

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR3447095

Subjects
Primary: 62F15: Bayesian inference 62M09: Non-Markovian processes: estimation 62P30: Applications in engineering and industry
Secondary: 62N01: Censored data models

Keywords
Bayesian analysis counting process latent variables multiplicative intensity process

Citation

Donnet, Sophie; Rousseau, Judith. Bayesian Inference for Partially Observed Multiplicative Intensity Processes. Bayesian Anal. 11 (2016), no. 1, 151--190. doi:10.1214/15-BA940. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ba/1425492492.


Export citation

References

  • Aalen, O. (1978). “Nonparametric inference for a family of counting processes.” The Annals of Statistics, 6: 701–726.
  • Andersen, P. K., Borgan, Ø., Gill, R. D., and Keiding, N. (1993). Statistical models based on counting processes. Springer Series in Statistics. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Chen, F. (2011). “Maximum local partial likelihood estimators for the counting process intensity function and its derivatives.” Statistica Sinica, 21: 107–128.
  • Gamiz, L., Kulasekera, K. B., Limnios, N., and Lindqvist, B. (2011). Applied Nonparametric Statistics in Reliability. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Gelman, A. and Rubin, D. B. (1992). “Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences.” Statistical Science, 7(4): 457–472.
  • Godsill, S. (2007). “Particle filters for continuous-time jump models in tracking applications.” In: ESAIM: Proceedings of Oxford Workshop on Particle Filtering.
  • Gusto, G. and Schbath, S. (2005). “FADO: a statistical method to detect favored or avoided distances between occurrences of motifs using the Hawkes model.” Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4: 1–26.
  • Ishawaran, H. and James, L. (2004). “Computational methods for multiplicative intensity models using weighted Gamma processes: proportional hazards, marked point processes, and panel count data.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99: 175–190.
  • Ogata, Y. (1999). “Seismicity Analysis through Point-process Modelling: A review.” Pure and Applied Geophysics, 155: 471–507.
  • Rao, V. A. and Teh, Y. W. (2013). “Fast MCMC sampling for Markov jump processes and extensions.” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 14: 3207–3232.
  • Reynaud-Bouret, P. and Schbath, S. (2010). “Adaptive estimation for Hawkes processes; application to genome analysis.” The Annals of Statistics, 38(5): 2781–2822.
  • Shonkwiler, R. (1980). “On age-dependent branching processes with immigration.” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 6(3): 289–296.
  • Tanner, M. R. and Wong, W. H. (1987). “The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(398): 528–550.
  • Whiteley, N., Johansen, A., and Godsill, S. (2011). “Monte Carlo filtering of piecewise deterministic processes.” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 20(1): 119–139.