Analysis & PDE

  • Anal. PDE
  • Volume 10, Number 2 (2017), 481-512.

Global dynamics below the standing waves for the focusing semilinear Schrödinger equation with a repulsive Dirac delta potential

Masahiro Ikeda and Takahisa Inui

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

However, an active subscription may be available with MSP at msp.org/apde.

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text

Abstract

We consider the focusing mass-supercritical semilinear Schrödinger equation with a repulsive Dirac delta potential on the real line :

itu + 1 2x2u + γδ 0u + |u|p1u = 0,(t,x) × , u(0,x) = u0(x) H1(),

where γ 0, δ0 denotes the Dirac delta with the mass at the origin, and p > 5. By a result of Fukuizumi, Ohta, and Ozawa (2008), it is known that the system above is locally well-posed in the energy space H1() and there exist standing wave solutions eiωtQω,γ(x) when ω > 1 2γ2, where Qω,γ is a unique radial positive solution to 1 2x2Q + ωQ γδ 0Q = |Q|p1Q. Our aim in the present paper is to find a necessary and sufficient condition on the data below the standing wave eiωtQω,0 to determine the global behavior of the solution. The similar result for NLS without potential (γ = 0) was obtained by Akahori and Nawa (2013); the scattering result was also extended by Fang, Xie, and Cazenave (2011). Our proof of the scattering result is based on the argument of Banica and Visciglia (2016), who proved all solutions scatter in the defocusing and repulsive case (γ < 0) by the Kenig–Merle method (2006). However, the method of Banica and Visciglia cannot be applicable to our problem because the energy may be negative in the focusing case. To overcome this difficulty, we use the variational argument based on the work of Ibrahim, Masmoudi, and Nakanishi (2011). Our proof of the blow-up result is based on the method of Du, Wu, and Zhang (2016). Moreover, we determine the global dynamics of the radial solution whose mass-energy is larger than that of the standing wave eiωtQω,0. The difference comes from the existence of the potential.

Article information

Source
Anal. PDE, Volume 10, Number 2 (2017), 481-512.

Dates
Received: 16 September 2016
Accepted: 28 November 2016
First available in Project Euclid: 16 November 2017

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.apde/1510843430

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.2140/apde.2017.10.481

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR3619878

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
1365.35156

Subjects
Primary: 35P25: Scattering theory [See also 47A40] 35Q55: NLS-like equations (nonlinear Schrödinger) [See also 37K10] 47J35: Nonlinear evolution equations [See also 34G20, 35K90, 35L90, 35Qxx, 35R20, 37Kxx, 37Lxx, 47H20, 58D25]

Keywords
global dynamics standing waves nonlinear Schrödinger equation Dirac delta potential

Citation

Ikeda, Masahiro; Inui, Takahisa. Global dynamics below the standing waves for the focusing semilinear Schrödinger equation with a repulsive Dirac delta potential. Anal. PDE 10 (2017), no. 2, 481--512. doi:10.2140/apde.2017.10.481. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.apde/1510843430


Export citation

References

  • T. Akahori and H. Nawa, “Blowup and scattering problems for the nonlinear Schrödinger equations”, Kyoto J. Math. 53:3 (2013), 629–672.
  • S. Albeverio, F. Gesztesy, R. Høegh-Krohn, and H. Holden, Solvable models in quantum mechanics, 2nd ed., AMS Chelsea, Providence, RI, 2005.
  • V. Banica and N. Visciglia, “Scattering for NLS with a delta potential”, J. Differential Equations 260:5 (2016), 4410–4439.
  • T. Cazenave, Semilinear Schrödinger equations, Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics 10, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003.
  • D. Du, Y. Wu, and K. Zhang, “On blow-up criterion for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation”, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 36:7 (2016), 3639–3650.
  • T. Duyckaerts, J. Holmer, and S. Roudenko, “Scattering for the non-radial 3D cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation”, Math. Res. Lett. 15:6 (2008), 1233–1250.
  • D. Fang, J. Xie, and T. Cazenave, “Scattering for the focusing energy-subcritical nonlinear Schrödinger equation”, Sci. China Math. 54:10 (2011), 2037–2062.
  • R. Fukuizumi and L. Jeanjean, “Stability of standing waves for a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a repulsive Dirac delta potential”, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 21:1 (2008), 121–136.
  • R. Fukuizumi, M. Ohta, and T. Ozawa, “Nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a point defect”, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 25:5 (2008), 837–845.
  • R. H. Goodman, P. J. Holmes, and M. I. Weinstein, “Strong NLS soliton-defect interactions”, Phys. D 192:3–4 (2004), 215–248.
  • J. Holmer and S. Roudenko, “A sharp condition for scattering of the radial 3D cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation”, Comm. Math. Phys. 282:2 (2008), 435–467.
  • J. Holmer and S. Roudenko, “Divergence of infinite-variance nonradial solutions to the 3D NLS equation”, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 35:5 (2010), 878–905.
  • S. Ibrahim, N. Masmoudi, and K. Nakanishi, “Scattering threshold for the focusing nonlinear Klein–Gordon equation”, Anal. PDE 4:3 (2011), 405–460.
  • C. E. Kenig and F. Merle, “Global well-posedness, scattering and blow-up for the energy-critical, focusing, non-linear Schrödinger equation in the radial case”, Invent. Math. 166:3 (2006), 645–675.
  • R. Killip, J. Murphy, M. Visan, and J. Zheng, “The focusing cubic NLS with inverse-square potential in three space dimensions”, preprint, 2016.
  • S. Le Coz, R. Fukuizumi, G. Fibich, B. Ksherim, and Y. Sivan, “Instability of bound states of a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a Dirac potential”, Phys. D 237:8 (2008), 1103–1128.