The Annals of Statistics
- Ann. Statist.
- Volume 35, Number 6 (2007), 2450-2473.
Consistency of cross validation for comparing regression procedures
Theoretical developments on cross validation (CV) have mainly focused on selecting one among a list of finite-dimensional models (e.g., subset or order selection in linear regression) or selecting a smoothing parameter (e.g., bandwidth for kernel smoothing). However, little is known about consistency of cross validation when applied to compare between parametric and nonparametric methods or within nonparametric methods. We show that under some conditions, with an appropriate choice of data splitting ratio, cross validation is consistent in the sense of selecting the better procedure with probability approaching 1.
Our results reveal interesting behavior of cross validation. When comparing two models (procedures) converging at the same nonparametric rate, in contrast to the parametric case, it turns out that the proportion of data used for evaluation in CV does not need to be dominating in size. Furthermore, it can even be of a smaller order than the proportion for estimation while not affecting the consistency property.
Ann. Statist., Volume 35, Number 6 (2007), 2450-2473.
First available in Project Euclid: 22 January 2008
Permanent link to this document
Digital Object Identifier
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
Zentralblatt MATH identifier
Primary: 62G07: Density estimation 62B10: Information-theoretic topics [See also 94A17]
Secondary: 62C20: Minimax procedures
Yang, Yuhong. Consistency of cross validation for comparing regression procedures. Ann. Statist. 35 (2007), no. 6, 2450--2473. doi:10.1214/009053607000000514. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aos/1201012968