Annals of Statistics

Point estimation with exponentially tilted empirical likelihood

Susanne M. Schennach

Full-text: Open access


Parameters defined via general estimating equations (GEE) can be estimated by maximizing the empirical likelihood (EL). Newey and Smith [Econometrica 72 (2004) 219–255] have recently shown that this EL estimator exhibits desirable higher-order asymptotic properties, namely, that its O(n−1) bias is small and that bias-corrected EL is higher-order efficient. Although EL possesses these properties when the model is correctly specified, this paper shows that, in the presence of model misspecification, EL may cease to be root n convergent when the functions defining the moment conditions are unbounded (even when their expectations are bounded). In contrast, the related exponential tilting (ET) estimator avoids this problem. This paper shows that the ET and EL estimators can be naturally combined to yield an estimator called exponentially tilted empirical likelihood (ETEL) exhibiting the same O(n−1) bias and the same O(n−2) variance as EL, while maintaining root n convergence under model misspecification.

Article information

Ann. Statist., Volume 35, Number 2 (2007), 634-672.

First available in Project Euclid: 5 July 2007

Permanent link to this document

Digital Object Identifier

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)

Zentralblatt MATH identifier

Primary: 62F10: Point estimation
Secondary: 62F12: Asymptotic properties of estimators

Entropy higher-order asymptotics misspecified models


Schennach, Susanne M. Point estimation with exponentially tilted empirical likelihood. Ann. Statist. 35 (2007), no. 2, 634--672. doi:10.1214/009053606000001208.

Export citation


  • Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the likelihood principle. In Proc. Second International Symposium on Information Theory (B. N. Petrov and F. Csáki, eds.) 267--281. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
  • Angrist, J., Chernozhukov, V. and Fernández-Val, I. (2006). Quantile regression under misspecification, with an application to the U.S. wage structure. Econometrica 74 539--563.
  • Back, K. and Brown, D. P. (1993). Implied probabilities in GMM estimators. Econometrica 61 971--975.
  • Baggerly, K. A. (1998). Empirical likelihood as goodness-of-fit measure. Biometrika 85 535--547.
  • Bickel, P. J. and Ghosh, J. K. (1990). A decomposition for the likelihood ratio statistic and the Bartlett correction---a Bayesian argument. Ann. Statist. 18 1070--1090.
  • Bonnal, H. and Renault, E. (2004). On the efficient use of the informational content of estimating equations: Implied probabilities and Euclidean empirical likelihood. Working paper, Univ. de Montréal.
  • Brown, B. W. and Newey, W. K. (2002). Generalized method of moments, efficient bootstrapping, and improved inference. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 20 507--517.
  • Chen, X., Hong, H. and Shum, M. (2002). Nonparametric likelihood selection tests for parametric versus moment condition models. Working paper, Johns Hopkins Univ.
  • Cochrane, J. H. (1996). A cross-sectional test of an investment-based asset pricing model. J. Political Economy 104 572--621.
  • Corcoran, S. A. (1998). Bartlett adjustment of empirical discrepancy statistics. Biometrika 85 967--972.
  • Cressie, N. and Read, T. R. C. (1984). Multinomial goodness-of-fit tests. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 46 440--464.
  • Csiszár, I. (1991). Why least squares and maximum entropy? An axiomatic approach to inference for linear inverse problems. Ann. Statist. 19 2032--2066.
  • Dahlhaus, R. and Wefelmeyer, W. (1996). Asymptotically optimal estimation in misspecified time series models. Ann. Statist. 24 952--974.
  • DiCiccio, T. J., Hall, P. and Romano, J. P. (1991). Empirical likelihood is Bartlett-correctable. Ann. Statist. 19 1053--1061.
  • DiCiccio, T. J. and Romano, J. P. (1990). Nonparametric confidence limits by resampling methods and least favorable families. Internat. Statist. Rev. 58 59--76.
  • Fan, J., Zhang, C. and Zhang, J. (2001). Generalized likelihood ratio statistics and Wilks phenomenon. Ann. Statist. 29 153--193.
  • Golan, A., Judge, G. and Miller, D. (1996). Maximum Entropy Econometrics: Robust Estimation with Limited Data. Wiley, New York.
  • Hall, A. R. and Inoue, A. (2003). The large sample behavior of the generalized method of moments estimator in misspecified models. J. Econometrics 114 361--394.
  • Hall, P. and Horowitz, J. (1996). Bootstrap critical values for tests based on generalized-method-of-moment estimators. Econometrica 64 891--916.
  • Hampel, F. R. (1974). The influence curve and its role in robust estimation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 69 383--393.
  • Hansen, L. P. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50 1029--1054.
  • Hansen, L. P., Heaton, J. and Yaron, A. (1996). Finite-sample properties of some alternative GMM estimators. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 14 262--280.
  • Hong, H., Preston, B. and Shum, M. (2003). Generalized empirical likelihood-based model selection criteria for moment condition models. Econometric Theory 19 923--943.
  • Huber, P. J. (1964). Robust estimation of a location parameter. Ann. Math. Statist. 35 73--101.
  • Huber, P. J. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. Proc. Fifth Berkeley Symposium Math. Statist. Probab. 1 221--233. Univ. California Press, Berkeley.
  • Imbens, G. W. (1997). One-step estimators for over-identified generalized method of moments models. Rev. Econom. Stud. 64 359--383.
  • Imbens, G. W. (2002). Generalized method of moments and empirical likelihood. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 20 493--506.
  • Imbens, G. W. and Spady, R. H. (2001). The performance of empirical likelihood and its generalizations. In Identification and Inference for Econometric Models (D. W. K. Andrews, ed.) 216--244. Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • Imbens, G. W. and Spady, R. H. (2002). Confidence intervals in generalized method of moments models. J. Econometrics 107 87--98.
  • Imbens, G. W., Spady, R. H. and Johnson, P. (1998). Information-theoretic approaches to inference in moment condition models. Econometrica 66 333--357.
  • Jing, B.-Y. and Wood, A. T. A. (1996). Exponential empirical likelihood is not Bartlett correctable. Ann. Statist. 24 365--369.
  • Kitamura, Y. (2000). Comparing misspecified dynamic econometric models using nonparametric likelihood. Working paper, Dept. Economics, Univ. Wisconsin.
  • Kitamura, Y. (2001). Asymptotic optimality of empirical likelihood for testing moment restrictions. Econometrica 69 1661--1672.
  • Kitamura, Y. (2003). A likelihood-based approach to the analysis of a class of nested and non-nested models. Working paper, Univ. Pennsylvania.
  • Kitamura, Y. and Stutzer, M. (1997). An information-theoretic alternative to generalized method of moments estimation. Econometrica 65 861--874.
  • Kitamura, Y. and Stutzer, M. (2002). Connections between entropic and linear projections in asset pricing estimation. J. Econometrics 107 159--174.
  • Kolaczyk, E. D. (1994). Empirical likelihood for generalized linear models. Statist. Sinica 4 199--218.
  • Kullback, S. (1959). Information Theory and Statistics. Wiley, New York.
  • Lazar, N. A. and Mykland, P. (1999). Empirical likelihood in the presence of nuisance parameters. Biometrika 86 203--211.
  • Lee, S. M. S. and Young, G. A. (1999). Nonparametric likelihood ratio confidence intervals. Biometrika 86 107--118.
  • Maasoumi, E. and Phillips, P. C. B. (1982). On the behavior of inconsistent instrumental variable estimators. J. Econometrics 19 183--201.
  • Meghir, C. and Weber, G. (1996). Intertemporal nonseparability or borrowing restrictions? A disaggregate analysis using a U.S. consumption panel. Econometrica 64 1151--1181.
  • Mittelhammer, R. C., Judge, G. G. and Schoenberg, R. (2005). Empirical evidence concerning the finite sample performance of EL-type structural equation estimation and inference methods. In Identification and Inference for Econometric Models (D. W. K. Andrews and J. H. Stock, eds.) 285--305. Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • Monfort, A. (1996). A reappraisal of misspecified econometric models. Econometric Theory 12 597--619.
  • Mykland, P. A. (1995). Dual likelihood. Ann. Statist. 23 396--421.
  • Newey, W. and McFadden, D. (1994). Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing. In Handbook of Econometrics 4 (R. F. Engle and D. L. McFadden, eds.) 2111--2245. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
  • Newey, W. and Smith, R. J. (2004). Higher-order properties of GMM and generalized empirical likelihood estimators. Econometrica 72 219--255.
  • Owen, A. B. (1988). Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional. Biometrika 75 237--249.
  • Owen, A. B. (1990). Empirical likelihood ratio confidence regions. Ann. Statist. 18 90--120.
  • Owen, A. B. (2001). Empirical Likelihood. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York.
  • Patilea, V. (2001). Convex models, MLE and misspecification. Ann. Statist. 29 94--123.
  • Pfanzagl, J. and Wefelmeyer, W. (1978). A third-order optimum property of the maximum likelihood estimator. J. Multivariate Anal. 8 1--29.
  • Qin, J. and Lawless, J. (1994). Empirical likelihood and general estimating equations. Ann. Statist. 22 300--325.
  • Ramalho, J. J. S. and Smith, R. J. (2002). Generalized empirical likelihood non-nested tests. J. Econometrics 107 99--125.
  • Rothenberg, T. J. (1984). Approximating the distribution of econometric estimators and test statistics. In Handbook of Econometrics 2 (Z. Griliches and M. D. Intriligator, eds.) 881--933. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
  • Sawa, T. (1978). Information criteria for discriminating among alternative regression models. Econometrica 46 1273--1291.
  • Schennach, S. M. (2005). Accompanying document to ``Point estimation using exponentially tilted empirical likelihood.'' Technical report, Univ. Chicago. Available at
  • Schennach, S. M. (2005). Bayesian exponentially tilted empirical likelihood. Biometrika 92 31--46.
  • Schennach, S. M. and Spady, R. H. (2003). Higher-order properties of GEL/EL estimators. Working paper, Univ. Chicago. Available at
  • Shore, J. and Johnson, R. (1980). Axiomatic derivation of the principle of maximum entropy and the principle of minimum cross-entropy. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 26 26--37.
  • Smith, R. J. (1997). Alternative semi-parametric likelihood approaches to generalized method of moments estimation. Economic J. 107 503--519.
  • Spady, R. H. (1996). Nonparametric inference by quasi-likelihood methods. Working paper, Nuffield College.
  • Vuong, Q. H. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica 57 307--333.
  • White, H. (1982). Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica 50 1--25.