The Annals of Probability

Regenerative tree growth: Markovian embedding of fragmenters, bifurcators, and bead splitting processes

Jim Pitman and Matthias Winkel

Full-text: Open access


Some, but not all processes of the form $M_{t}=\exp(-\xi_{t})$ for a pure-jump subordinator $\xi$ with Laplace exponent $\Phi$ arise as residual mass processes of particle 1 (tagged particle) in Bertoin’s partition-valued exchangeable fragmentation processes. We introduce the notion of a Markovian embedding of $M=(M_{t},t\ge0)$ in a fragmentation process, and we show that for each $\Phi$, there is a unique (in distribution) binary fragmentation process in which $M$ has a Markovian embedding. The identification of the Laplace exponent $\Phi^{*}$ of its tagged particle process $M^{*}$ gives rise to a symmetrisation operation $\Phi\mapsto\Phi^{*}$, which we investigate in a general study of pairs $(M,M^{*})$ that coincide up to a random time and then evolve independently. We call $M$ a fragmenter and $(M,M^{*})$ a bifurcator.

For $\alpha>0$, we equip the interval $R_{1}=[0,\int_{0}^{\infty}M_{t}^{\alpha}\,dt]$ with a purely atomic probability measure $\mu_{1}$, which captures the jump sizes of $M$ suitably placed on $R_{1}$. We study binary tree growth processes that in the $n$th step sample an atom (“bead”) from $\mu_{n}$ and build $(R_{n+1},\mu_{n+1})$ by replacing the atom by a rescaled independent copy of $(R_{1},\mu_{1})$ that we tie to the position of the atom. We show that any such bead splitting process $((R_{n},\mu_{n}),n\ge1)$ converges almost surely to an $\alpha$-self-similar continuum random tree of Haas and Miermont, in the Gromov–Hausdorff–Prohorov sense. This generalises Aldous’s line-breaking construction of the Brownian continuum random tree.

Article information

Ann. Probab., Volume 43, Number 5 (2015), 2611-2646.

Received: April 2013
Revised: May 2014
First available in Project Euclid: 9 September 2015

Permanent link to this document

Digital Object Identifier

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)

Zentralblatt MATH identifier

Primary: 60J80: Branching processes (Galton-Watson, birth-and-death, etc.)

Fragmentation self-similar tree continuum random tree $\mathbb{R}$-tree weighted $\mathbb{R}$-tree


Pitman, Jim; Winkel, Matthias. Regenerative tree growth: Markovian embedding of fragmenters, bifurcators, and bead splitting processes. Ann. Probab. 43 (2015), no. 5, 2611--2646. doi:10.1214/14-AOP945.

Export citation


  • [1] Abraham, R. (1992). Un arbre aléatoire infini associé à l’excursion brownienne. In Séminaire de Probabilités, XXVI. Lecture Notes in Math. 1526 374–397. Springer, Berlin.
  • [2] Aldous, D. (1991). The continuum random tree. I. Ann. Probab. 19 1–28.
  • [3] Aldous, D. (1993). The continuum random tree. III. Ann. Probab. 21 248–289.
  • [4] Aldous, D., Miermont, G. and Pitman, J. (2004). Brownian bridge asymptotics for random $p$-mappings. Electron. J. Probab. 9 37–56 (electronic).
  • [5] Bertoin, J. (2001). Homogeneous fragmentation processes. Probab. Theory Related Fields 121 301–318.
  • [6] Bertoin, J. (2002). Self-similar fragmentations. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. 38 319–340.
  • [7] Bertoin, J. (2006). Random Fragmentation and Coagulation Processes. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 102. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
  • [8] Bertoin, J. and Pitman, J. (1994). Path transformations connecting Brownian bridge, excursion and meander. Bull. Sci. Math. 118 147–166.
  • [9] Bertoin, J. and Yor, M. (2005). Exponential functionals of Lévy processes. Probab. Surv. 2 191–212.
  • [10] Chen, B., Ford, D. and Winkel, M. (2009). A new family of Markov branching trees: The alpha-gamma model. Electron. J. Probab. 14 400–430.
  • [11] Chen, B. and Winkel, M. (2013). Restricted exchangeable partitions and embedding of associated hierarchies in continuum random trees. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. 49 839–872.
  • [12] Doksum, K. (1974). Tailfree and neutral random probabilities and their posterior distributions. Ann. Probab. 2 183–201.
  • [13] Doksum, K. A. and James, L. F. (2004). On spatial neutral to the right processes and their posterior distributions. In Mathematical Reliability: An Expository Perspective. Internat. Ser. Oper. Res. Management Sci. 67 87–103. Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA.
  • [14] Dong, R., Goldschmidt, C. and Martin, J. B. (2006). Coagulation-fragmentation duality, Poisson–Dirichlet distributions and random recursive trees. Ann. Appl. Probab. 16 1733–1750.
  • [15] Evans, S. N. (2008). Probability and Real Trees. Lecture Notes in Math. 1920. Springer, Berlin. Lectures from the 35th Summer School on Probability Theory held in Saint-Flour, July 6–23, 2005.
  • [16] Ford, D. J. (2005). Probabilities on cladograms: Introduction to the alpha model. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford Univ. Available at arXiv:math.PR/0511246.
  • [17] Gnedin, A. and Pitman, J. (2005). Regenerative composition structures. Ann. Probab. 33 445–479.
  • [18] Gnedin, A., Pitman, J. and Yor, M. (2006). Asymptotic laws for compositions derived from transformed subordinators. Ann. Probab. 34 468–492.
  • [19] Haas, B. (2003). Loss of mass in deterministic and random fragmentations. Stochastic Process. Appl. 106 245–277.
  • [20] Haas, B. and Miermont, G. (2004). The genealogy of self-similar fragmentations with negative index as a continuum random tree. Electron. J. Probab. 9 57–97 (electronic).
  • [21] Haas, B. and Miermont, G. (2012). Scaling limits of Markov branching trees with applications to Galton–Watson and random unordered trees. Ann. Probab. 40 2589–2666.
  • [22] Haas, B., Miermont, G., Pitman, J. and Winkel, M. (2008). Continuum tree asymptotics of discrete fragmentations and applications to phylogenetic models. Ann. Probab. 36 1790–1837.
  • [23] Haas, B., Pitman, J. and Winkel, M. (2009). Spinal partitions and invariance under re-rooting of continuum random trees. Ann. Probab. 37 1381–1411.
  • [24] James, L. F. (2006). Poisson calculus for spatial neutral to the right processes. Ann. Statist. 34 416–440.
  • [25] Kallenberg, O. (2002). Foundations of Modern Probability, 2nd ed. Springer, New York.
  • [26] Perman, M., Pitman, J. and Yor, M. (1992). Size-biased sampling of Poisson point processes and excursions. Probab. Theory Related Fields 92 21–39.
  • [27] Pitman, J. (1999). Coalescents with multiple collisions. Ann. Probab. 27 1870–1902.
  • [28] Pitman, J. (2006). Combinatorial Stochastic Processes. Lecture Notes in Math. 1875. Springer, Berlin. Lectures from the 32nd Summer School on Probability Theory held in Saint-Flour, July 7–24, 2002, With a foreword by Jean Picard.
  • [29] Pitman, J., Rizzolo, D. and Winkel, M. (2014). Regenerative tree growth: Structural results and convergence. Electron. J. Probab. 19 no. 70, 1–29. Also available at arXiv:1207.3551.
  • [30] Pitman, J. and Winkel, M. (2009). Regenerative tree growth: Binary self-similar continuum random trees and Poisson–Dirichlet compositions. Ann. Probab. 37 1999–2041.
  • [31] Stephenson, R. (2013). General fragmentation trees. Electron. J. Probab. 18 1–45.