The Annals of Applied Statistics

Bayesian methods for multiple mediators: Relating principal stratification and causal mediation in the analysis of power plant emission controls

Chanmin Kim, Michael J. Daniels, Joseph W. Hogan, Christine Choirat, and Corwin M. Zigler

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text

Abstract

Emission control technologies installed on power plants are a key feature of many air pollution regulations in the US. While such regulations are predicated on the presumed relationships between emissions, ambient air pollution and human health, many of these relationships have never been empirically verified. The goal of this paper is to develop new statistical methods to quantify these relationships. We frame this problem as one of mediation analysis to evaluate the extent to which the effect of a particular control technology on ambient pollution is mediated through causal effects on power plant emissions. Since power plants emit various compounds that contribute to ambient pollution, we develop new methods for multiple intermediate variables that are measured contemporaneously, may interact with one another, and may exhibit joint mediating effects. Specifically, we propose new methods leveraging two related frameworks for causal inference in the presence of mediating variables: principal stratification and causal mediation analysis. We define principal effects based on multiple mediators, and also introduce a new decomposition of the total effect of an intervention on ambient pollution into the natural direct effect and natural indirect effects for all combinations of mediators. Both approaches are anchored to the same observed-data models, which we specify with Bayesian nonparametric techniques. We provide assumptions for estimating principal causal effects, then augment these with an additional assumption required for causal mediation analysis. The two analyses, interpreted in tandem, provide the first empirical investigation of the presumed causal pathways that motivate important air quality regulatory policies.

Article information

Source
Ann. Appl. Stat., Volume 13, Number 3 (2019), 1927-1956.

Dates
Received: July 2017
Revised: January 2019
First available in Project Euclid: 17 October 2019

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoas/1571277778

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1214/19-AOAS1260

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR4019162

Keywords
Ambient $\mathrm{PM}_{2.5}$ Bayesian nonparametrics Gaussian copula multipollutants natural indirect effect

Citation

Kim, Chanmin; Daniels, Michael J.; Hogan, Joseph W.; Choirat, Christine; Zigler, Corwin M. Bayesian methods for multiple mediators: Relating principal stratification and causal mediation in the analysis of power plant emission controls. Ann. Appl. Stat. 13 (2019), no. 3, 1927--1956. doi:10.1214/19-AOAS1260. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoas/1571277778


Export citation

References

  • Albert, J. M. and Nelson, S. (2011). Generalized causal mediation analysis. Biometrics 67 1028–1038.
  • Baccini, M., Mattei, A. and Mealli, F. (2015). Bayesian inference for causal mechanisms with application to a randomized study for postoperative pain control. DISIA Working Paper.
  • Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51 1173–1182.
  • Bartolucci, F. and Grilli, L. (2011). Modeling partial compliance through copulas in a principal stratification framework. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 106 469–479.
  • Chestnut, L. G. and Mills, D. M. (2005). A fresh look at the benefits and costs of the US acid rain program. J. Environ. Manag. 77 252–266.
  • Conlon, A. S. C., Taylor, J. M. G. and Elliott, M. R. (2017). Surrogacy assessment using principal stratification and a Gaussian copula model. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 26 88–107.
  • Daniel, R. M., De Stavola, B. L., Cousens, S. N. and Vansteelandt, S. (2015). Causal mediation analysis with multiple mediators. Biometrics 71 1–14.
  • Daniels, M. J., Roy, J. A., Kim, C., Hogan, J. W. and Perri, M. G. (2012). Bayesian inference for the causal effect of mediation. Biometrics 68 1028–1036.
  • Dominici, F., Greenstone, M. and Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Particulate matter matters. Science 344 257–259. DOI:10.1126/science.1247348.
  • Forastiere, L., Mealli, F. and VanderWeele, T. J. (2016). Identification and estimation of causal mechanisms in clustered encouragement designs: Disentangling bed nets using Bayesian principal stratification. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 111 510–525.
  • Frangakis, C. E. and Rubin, D. B. (2002). Principal stratification in causal inference. Biometrics 58 21–29.
  • Gilbert, P. B. and Hudgens, M. G. (2008). Evaluating candidate principal surrogate endpoints. Biometrics 64 1146–1154.
  • Gustafson, P. (2010). Bayesian inference for partially identified models. Int. J. Biostat. 6 Art. 17, 20.
  • HEI Accountability Working Group (2003). Assessing the Health Impact of Air Quality Regulations: Concepts and Methods for Accountability Research. Communication 11. Health Effects Institute, Boston, MA.
  • Hodan, W. M. and Barnard, W. R. (2004). Evaluating the contribution of PM2.5 precursor gases and re-entrained road emissions to mobile source PM2.5 particulate matter emissions. In 13th International Emission Inventory Conference “Working for Clean Air in Clearwater.”
  • Imai, K., Keele, L. and Yamamoto, T. (2010). Identification, inference and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Statist. Sci. 25 51–71.
  • Imai, K. and Yamamoto, T. (2013). Identification and sensitivity analysis for multiple causal mechanism: Revisiting evidence from framing experiments. Polit. Anal. 21 141–171.
  • Joffe, M. M. and Greene, T. (2009). Related causal frameworks for surrogate outcomes. Biometrics 65 530–538.
  • Kim, C., Daniels, M. J., Marcus, B. H. and Roy, J. A. (2017). A framework for Bayesian nonparametric inference for causal effects of mediation. Biometrics 73 401–409.
  • Kim, C., Daniels, M. J., Hogan, J. W., Choirat, C. and Zigler, C. M. (2019). Supplement to “Bayesian methods for multiple mediators: Relating principal stratification and causal mediation in the analysis of power plant emission controls.” DOI:10.1214/19-AOAS1260SUPP.
  • Ma, Y., Roy, J. and Marcus, B. (2011). Causal models for randomized trials with two active treatments and continuous compliance. Stat. Med. 30 2349–2362.
  • MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, New York.
  • Mattei, A. and Mealli, F. (2011). Augmented designs to assess principal strata direct effects. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 73 729–752.
  • Mealli, F. and Mattei, A. (2012). A refreshing account of principal stratification. Int. J. Biostat. 8 Art. 8, 19.
  • Mealli, F. and Pacini, B. (2013). Using secondary outcomes to sharpen inference in randomized experiments with noncompliance. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 108 1120–1131.
  • Mealli, F. and Rubin, D. B. (2003). Assumptions allowing the estimation of direct causal effects. J. Econometrics 112 79–87.
  • Müller, P., Erkanli, A. and West, M. (1996). Bayesian curve fitting using multivariate normal mixtures. Biometrika 83 67–79.
  • Nelsen, R. B. (1999). An Introduction to Copulas. Lecture Notes in Statistics 139. Springer, New York.
  • Office of Management and Budget (2013). 2013 Draft report to Congress on the benefits and costs of federal regulation and unfunded mandates on state, local, and tribal entities. Technical report, OMB, Washington, DC.
  • Pearl, J. (2001). Direct and indirect effects. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 411–420. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, CA.
  • Pope III, C. A., Ezzati, M. and Dockery, D. W. (2009). Fine-particulate air pollution and life expectancy in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 360 376–386.
  • Robins, J. M. and Greenland, S. (1992). Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology 3 143–155.
  • Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causaleffects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J. Educ. Psychol. 58 688–701.
  • Rubin, D. B. (2004). Direct and indirect causal effects via potential outcomes. Scand. J. Stat. 31 161–170.
  • Schwartz, S. L., Li, F. and Mealli, F. (2011). A Bayesian semiparametric approach to intermediate variables in causal inference. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 106 1331–1344.
  • Taguri, M., Featherstone, J. and Cheng, J. (2018). Causal mediation analysis with multiple causally non-ordered mediators. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 27 3–19.
  • U. S. EPA (2013). Workshop on designing research to assess air quality and health outcomes from air pollution regulations. In Designing Research to Assess Air QuAlity and Health Outcomes from Air Pollution Regulations.
  • VanderWeele, T. J. (2008). Simple relations between principal stratification and direct and indirect effects. Statist. Probab. Lett. 78 2957–2962.
  • VanderWeele, T. J. (2009). Marginal structural models for the estimation of direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology 20 18–26.
  • VanderWeele, T. J. (2011). Principal stratification—uses and limitations. Int. J. Biostat. 7 Art. 28, 14.
  • VanderWeele, T. J. and Vansteelandt, S. (2014). Mediation analysis with multiple mediators. Epidemiol Methods 2 95–115.
  • Wang, W., Nelson, S. and Albert, J. M. (2013). Estimation of causal mediation effects for a dichotomous outcome in multiple-mediator models using the mediation formula. Stat. Med. 32 4211–4228.
  • Zigler, C. M., Dominici, F. and Wang, Y. (2012). Estimating causal effects of air quality regulations using principal stratification for spatially correlated multivariate intermediate outcomes. Biostatistics (Oxford, England) 13 289–302. DOI:10.1093/biostatistics/kxr052.

Supplemental materials

  • Supplement to “Bayesian methods for multiple mediators: Relating principal stratification and causal mediation in the analysis of power plant emission controls”. Appendices A–J, tables and figures are provided as supplementary materials.