Project Euclid

References

• Barbary, K. (2016). SEP: Source extractor as a library. The Journal of Open Source Software 1 59.
• Berger, J. O. (1985). Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis, 2nd ed. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0572.62008
  
• Bertin, E. and Arnouts, S. (1996). SExtractor: Software for source extraction. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 117 393–404.
• Bezanson, J., Edelman, A., Karpinski, S. and Shah, V. B. (2017). Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing. SIAM Rev. 59 65–98.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1356.68030
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1137/141000671
  
• Bickel, P. J. and Doksum, K. A. (2016). Mathematical Statistics—Basic Ideas and Selected Topics. Vol. 2, 2nd ed. Texts in Statistical Science Series. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
• Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Information Science and Statistics. Springer, New York.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1107.68072
  
• Blei, D. M., Kucukelbir, A. and McAuliffe, J. D. (2017). Variational inference: A review for statisticians. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 112 859–877.
• Booth, J. G. and Sarkar, S. (1998). Monte Carlo approximation of bootstrap variances. Amer. Statist. 52 354–357.
• Bosch, J., Armstrong, R., Bickerton, S. et al. (2018). The Hyper Suprime-Cam software pipeline. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 70.
• Brewer, B. J., Foreman-Mackey, D. and Hogg, D. W. (2013). Probabilistic catalogs for crowded stellar fields. Astron. J. 146.
• Bubeck, S. (2015). Convex optimization: Algorithms and complexity. Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 8.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1365.90196
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1561/2200000050
  
• Doi, M., Tanaka, M. et al. (2010). Photometric response functions of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey imager. Astron. J. 139.
• Eisenstein, D. J., Annis, J., Gunn, J. E. et al. (2001). Spectroscopic target selection for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: The Luminous red galaxy sample. Astron. J. 122 2267.
• Fan, Y. and Sisson, S. A. (2011). Reversible Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo. In Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo.
• Feigelson, E. D. and Babu, G. J. (2012). Modern Statistical Methods for Astronomy: With R Applications. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
• Feldman, M. (2018). Summit up and running at Oak Ridge. Available at https://www.top500.org/news/summit-up-and-running-at-oak-ridge-claims-first-exascale-application/. [Online; accessed August 20, 2018].
• Folk, M., Heber, G., Koziol, Q., Pourmal, E. and Robinson, D. (2011). An overview of the HDF5 technology suite and its applications. In Proceedings of the EDBT/ICDT 2011 Workshop on Array Databases 36–47.
• Fraysse, A. and Rodet, T. (2014). A measure-theoretic variational Bayesian algorithm for large dimensional problems. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 7 2591–2622.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1309.65064
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1137/140966575
  
• Friel, N. and Wyse, J. (2012). Estimating the evidence—a review. Stat. Neerl. 66 288–308.
• Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K. and Schneider, D. P. (1996). The Sloan Digital Sky Survey photometric system. Astron. J. 111.
• Gelman, A. and Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statist. Sci. 7 457–472.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1386.65060
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/ss/1177011136
  Project Euclid: euclid.ss/1177011136
  
• Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A. and Rubin, D. B. (2014). Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd ed. Texts in Statistical Science Series. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1279.62004
  
• Giordano, R. J., Broderick, T. and Jordan, M. I. (2015). Linear response methods for accurate covariance estimates from mean field variational Bayes. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 1441–1449.
• Green, P. J. (1995). Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika 82 711–732.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0861.62023
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1093/biomet/82.4.711
  
• Hager, G. and Wellein, G. (2010). Introduction to High Performance Computing for Scientists and Engineers. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
• Hershey, J. R. and Olsen, P. A. (2007). Approximating the Kullback Leibler divergence between Gaussian mixture models. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 4 317–320.
• Julia developers (2018). Julia micro-benchmarks. Available at https://julialang.org/benchmarks/. [Online; accessed January 23, 2018].
• Lang, D., Hogg, D. W. and Mykytyn, D. (2016). The Tractor: Probabilistic astronomical source detection and measurement. Astrophysics Source Code Library.
• LSST (2017). About LSST. Available at http://www.lsst.org/about. [Online; accessed September 12, 2017].
• Lupton, R. H., Ivezic, Z. et al. (2005). SDSS image processing II: The photo pipelines. Technical Report, Princeton Univ. Preprint. Available at https://www.astro.princeton.edu/~rhl/photo-lite.pdf.
• Lupton, R., Gunn, J. E., Ivezić, Z., Knapp, G. R. and Kent, S. (2001). The SDSS imaging pipelines. In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems X (F. R. Harnden, Jr., F. A. Primini and H. E. Payne, eds.). Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series 238 269–280.
• MacKay, D. J. (1995). Developments in probabilistic modelling with neural networks—ensemble learning. In Neural Networks: Artificial Intelligence and Industrial Applications. Springer, Berlin.
• Melchior, P., Moolekamp, F., Jerdee, M., Armstrong, R., Sun, A.-L., Bosch, J. and Lupton, R. (2018). SCARLET: Source separation in multi-band images by constrained matrix factorization. Available at arXiv:1802.10157.
  arXiv: 1802.10157
  
• Morgan, T. (2018). The end of Xeon Phi. Available at https://www.nextplatform.com/2018/07/27/end-of-the-line-for-xeon-phi-its-all-xeon-from-here/. [Online; accessed August 20, 2018].
• Mujtaba, H. (2018). Intel Xeon Scalable Family Roadmap Revealed. Available at https://wccftech.com/intel-xeon-scalable-family-roadmap-revealed-points-out-cascade-lake-sp-in-q4-2018-cooper-lake-sp-in-q4-2019-ice-lake-sp-in-1h-2020/. [Online; accessed August 20, 2018].
• Murphy, K. (2012). Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1295.68003
  
• Neal, R. M. (2001). Annealed importance sampling. Stat. Comput. 11 125–139.
• Neal, R. M. (2003). Slice sampling. Ann. Statist. 31 705–767.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1051.65007
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1056562461
  Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1056562461
  
• NERSC (2018). Cori configuration. Available at http://www.nersc.gov/users/computational-systems/cori/configuration/. [Online; accessed January 23, 2018].
• Nocedal, J. and Wright, S. J. (2006). Numerical Optimization, 2nd ed. Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering. Springer, New York.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1104.65059
  
• Portillo, S. K. N., Lee, B. C. G., Daylan, T. and Finkbeiner, D. P. (2017). Improved point-source detection in crowded fields using probabilistic cataloging. Astron. J. 154.
• Price, D. C., Barsdell, B. R. and Greenhill, L. J. (2015). HDFITS: Porting the FITS data model to HDF5. Astron. Comput. 12.
• Regier, J., McAuliffe, J. and Prabhat (2015). A deep generative model for astronomical images of galaxies. In NIPS Workshop: Advances in Approximate Bayesian Inference.
• Regier, J., Miller, A. C., Schlegel, D., Adams, R. P., McAuliffe, J. D. and Prabhat (2019). Supplement to “Approximate inference for constructing astronomical catalogs from images.” DOI:10.1214/19-AOAS1258SUPP.
• Richards, G. T., Fan, X., Newberg, H. J., Strauss, M. A. et al. (2002). Spectroscopic target selection in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: The quasar sample. Astron. J. 123 2945.
• Robert, C. P. and Casella, G. (1999). Monte Carlo Statistical Methods. Springer Texts in Statistics. Springer, New York.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0935.62005
  
• Rowe, B., Jarvis, M., Mandelbaum, R. et al. (2015). GALSIM: The modular galaxy image simulation toolkit. Astron. Comput. 10.
• Schmidt, M. N., Winther, O. and Hansen, L. K. (2009). Bayesian non-negative matrix factorization. In International Conference on Independent Component Analysis and Signal Separation 540–547.
• SDSS (2017). Measures of flux and magnitude. Available at http://www.sdss3.org/dr8/algorithms/magnitudes.php. [Online; accessed November 12, 2017].
• SDSS (2018a). Glossary of SDSS-IV terminology. Available at https://www.sdss.org/dr14/help/glossary/#N. [Online; accessed August 21, 2018].
• SDSS (2018b). Camera. Available at http://www.sdss.org/instruments/camera/. [Online; accessed January 30, 2018].
• SDSS (2018c). Sky coverage. Available at http://classic.sdss.org/dr7/coverage/. [Online; accessed January 30, 2018].
• SDSS (2018d). Data model: Frame. https://data.sdss.org/datamodel/files/BOSS_PHOTOOBJ/frames/RERUN/RUN/CAMCOL/frame.html. [Online; accessed August 21, 2018].
• Skilling, J. (2004). Nested sampling. In Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering. AIP Conf. Proc. 735 395–405. Amer. Inst. Phys., Melville, NY.
• Šmídl, V. and Quinn, A. (2008). Variational Bayesian filtering. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 56 5020–5030.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1390.94061
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1109/TSP.2008.928969
  
• Smith, R. (2018). AMD reaffirms 7nm Epyc Rome server processors sampling in 2H 2018. Available at https://www.anandtech.com/show/13122/amd-rome-epyc-cpus-to-be-fabbed-by-tsmc. [Online; accessed August 20, 2018].
• Strauss, M. A., Weinberg, D. H., Lupton, R. H. et al. (2002). Spectroscopic target selection in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: The main galaxy sample. Astron. J. 124 1810.
• Top500.org (2017). Top500 List—November 2017. Available at https://www.top500.org/list/2017/11/. [Online; accessed November 16, 2017].
• Turon, C., Meynadier, F., Arenou, F., Hogg, D. and Lang, D. (2010). Telescopes Don’t Make Catalogues! European Astronomical Society Publications Series 45.
• van Leeuwen, D. (2018). GaussianMixtures.jl. Available at https://github.com/davidavdav/GaussianMixtures.jl. [Online; accessed August 21, 2018].
• Wells, D. C. and Greisen, E. W. (1979). FITS—a flexible image transport system. In Image Processing in Astronomy 445–471.
• Wilson, H. (2009). M33—“The Galaxy in Triangulum.” Available at https://hwilson.zenfolio.com/galaxies/h274E3B43#h274e3b43.
• York, D. G., Adelman, J., Anderson, J., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., Bakken, J. A. et al. (2000). The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical summary. Astron. J. 120 1579–1587.
• Zheng, Y., Fraysse, A. and Rodet, T. (2015). Efficient variational Bayesian approximation method based on subspace optimization. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 24 681–693.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1408.62047
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1109/TIP.2014.2383321