The Annals of Applied Statistics

Nonparametric testing for differences in electricity prices: The case of the Fukushima nuclear accident

Dominik Liebl

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text


This work is motivated by the problem of testing for differences in the mean electricity prices before and after Germany’s abrupt nuclear phaseout after the nuclear disaster in Fukushima Daiichi, Japan, in mid-March 2011. Taking into account the nature of the data and the auction design of the electricity market, we approach this problem using a Local Linear Kernel (LLK) estimator for the nonparametric mean function of sparse covariate-adjusted functional data. We build upon recent theoretical work on the LLK estimator and propose a two-sample test statistics using a finite sample correction to avoid size distortions. Our nonparametric test results on the price differences point to a Simpson’s paradox explaining an unexpected result recently reported in the literature.

Article information

Ann. Appl. Stat., Volume 13, Number 2 (2019), 1128-1146.

Received: August 2017
Revised: November 2018
First available in Project Euclid: 17 June 2019

Permanent link to this document

Digital Object Identifier

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)

Electricity spot prices functional data analysis local linear kernel estimation nuclear power phaseout sparse functional data time series analysis


Liebl, Dominik. Nonparametric testing for differences in electricity prices: The case of the Fukushima nuclear accident. Ann. Appl. Stat. 13 (2019), no. 2, 1128--1146. doi:10.1214/18-AOAS1230.

Export citation


  • Ball, R. and Brown, P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. J. Acc. Res. 159–178.
  • Benko, M., Härdle, W. and Kneip, A. (2009). Common functional principal components. Ann. Statist. 37 1–34.
  • Benth, F. E., Kholodnyi, V. A. and Laurence, P., eds. (2014). Quantitative Energy Finance: Modeling, Pricing, and Hedging in Energy and Commodity Markets. Springer, New York.
  • Betzer, A., Doumet, M. and Rinne, U. (2013). How policy changes affect shareholder wealth: The case of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. Appl. Econ. Lett. 20 799–803.
  • Bruninx, K., Madzharov, D., Delarue, E. and D’haeseleer, W. (2013). Impact of the German nuclear phase-out on Europe’s electricity generation—a comprehensive study. Energy Policy 60 251–261.
  • Bublitz, A., Keles, D. and Fichtner, W. (2017). An analysis of the decline of electricity spot prices in Europe: Who is to blame? Energy Policy 107 323–336.
  • Burger, M., Graeber, B. and Schindlmayr, G. (2008). Managing Energy Risk: An Integrated View on Power and Other Energy Markets, 1st ed. Wiley, New York.
  • Burger, M., Klar, B., Müller, A. and Schindlmayr, G. (2004). A spot market model for pricing derivatives in electricity markets. Quant. Finance 4 109–122.
  • Cao, G., Yang, L. and Todem, D. (2012). Simultaneous inference for the mean function based on dense functional data. J. Nonparametr. Stat. 24 359–377.
  • Cardot, H. (2007). Conditional functional principal components analysis. Scand. J. Stat. 34 317–335.
  • Charnigo, R. and Srinivasan, C. (2015). A multivariate generalized $C_{p}$ and surface estimation. Biostatistics 16 311–325.
  • Cludius, J., Hermann, H., Matthes, F. C. and Graichen, V. (2014). The merit order effect of wind and photovoltaic electricity generation in Germany 2008–2016: Estimation and distributional implications. Energy Econ. 44 302–313.
  • Cox, D. D. and Lee, J. S. (2008). Pointwise testing with functional data using the Westfall–Young randomization method. Biometrika 95 621–634.
  • Fama, E. F., Fisher, L., Jensen, M. C. and Roll, R. (1969). The adjustment of stock prices to new information. Internat. Econom. Rev. 10 1–21.
  • Fan, J. and Yao, Q. (2003). Nonlinear Time Series: Nonparametric and Parametric Methods. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York.
  • Ferraty, F. and Vieu, P. (2006). Nonparametric Functional Data Analysis: Theory and Practice. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York.
  • Ferstl, R., Utz, S. and Wimmer, M. (2012). The effect of the Japan 2011 disaster on nuclear and alternative energy stocks worldwide: An event study. Bus. Res. 5 25–41.
  • Fogarty, C. B. and Small, D. S. (2014). Equivalence testing for functional data with an application to comparing pulmonary function devices. Ann. Appl. Stat. 8 2002–2026.
  • Gromenko, O. and Kokoszka, P. (2012). Testing the equality of mean functions of ionospheric critical frequency curves. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C. Appl. Stat. 61 715–731.
  • Gromenko, O., Kokoszka, P. and Sojka, J. (2017). Evaluation of the cooling trend in the ionosphere using functional regression with incomplete curves. Ann. Appl. Stat. 11 898–918.
  • Grossi, L., Heim, S. and Waterson, M. (2017). The impact of the German response to the Fukushima earthquake. Energy Econ. 66 450–465.
  • Hall, P., Müller, H.-G. and Wang, J.-L. (2006). Properties of principal component methods for functional and longitudinal data analysis. Ann. Statist. 34 1493–1517.
  • Hall, P. and Van Keilegom, I. (2007). Two-sample tests in functional data analysis starting from discrete data. Statist. Sinica 17 1511–1531.
  • Hirth, L. (2013). The market value of variable renewables: The effect of solar wind power variability on their relative price. Energy Econ. 38 218–236.
  • Horváth, L. and Kokoszka, P. (2012). Inference for Functional Data with Applications. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York.
  • Horváth, L., Kokoszka, P. and Reeder, R. (2013). Estimation of the mean of functional time series and a two-sample problem. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 75 103–122.
  • Hsing, T. and Eubank, R. (2015). Theoretical Foundations of Functional Data Analysis, with an Introduction to Linear Operators. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley, Chichester.
  • Jiang, C.-R. and Wang, J.-L. (2010). Covariate adjusted functional principal components analysis for longitudinal data. Ann. Statist. 38 1194–1226.
  • Li, M., Staicu, A.-M. and Bondell, H. D. (2015). Incorporating covariates in skewed functional data models. Biostatistics 16 413–426.
  • Liebl, D. (2013). Modeling and forecasting electricity spot prices: A functional data perspective. Ann. Appl. Stat. 7 1562–1592.
  • Liebl, D. (2019a). Inference for sparse and dense functional data with covariate adjustments. J. Multivariate Anal. 170 315–335.
  • Liebl, D. (2019b). Supplement to “Nonparametric testing for differences in electricity prices: The case of the Fukushima nuclear accident.” DOI:10.1214/18-AOAS1230SUPPA, DOI:10.1214/18-AOAS1230SUPPB.
  • Lijesen, M. G. (2007). The real-time price elasticity of electricity. Energy Econ. 29 249–258.
  • Lisi, F. and Shah, I. (2018). Forecasting next-day electricity demand and prices based on functional models. Working paper.
  • Maciejowska, K. and Weron, R. (2016). Short-and mid-term forecasting of baseload electricity prices in the UK: The impact of intra-day price relationships and market fundamentals. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 31 994–1005.
  • MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). Event studies in economics and finance. J. Econ. Lit. 35 13–39.
  • Martins-Filho, C. and Yao, F. (2007). Nonparametric frontier estimation via local linear regression. J. Econometrics 141 283–319.
  • McDermott, G. R. and Nilsen, Ø. A. (2014). Electricity prices, river temperatures, and cooling water scarcity. Land Econ. 90 131–148.
  • McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (1997). Event studies in management research: Theoretical and empirical issues. Acad. Manage. J. 40 626–657.
  • Paraschiv, F., Erni, D. and Pietsch, R. (2014). The impact of renewable energies on EEX day-ahead electricity prices. Energy Policy 73 196–210.
  • Rabi, A., Hadzima-Nyarko, M. and Šperac, M. (2015). Modelling river temperature from air temperature: Case of the river Drava (Croatia). Hydrol. Sci. J. 60 1490–1507.
  • Ramsay, J. O. and Silverman, B. W. (2005). Functional Data Analysis, 2nd ed. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York.
  • Rohatgi, A. (2018). WebPlotDigitizer, version: 4.1. Austin, TX.
  • Sensfuß, F., Ragwitz, M. and Genoese, M. (2008). The merit-order effect: A detailed analysis of the price effect of renewable electricity generation on spot market prices in Germany. Energy Policy 36 3086–3094.
  • Serban, N. (2011). A space-time varying coefficient model: The equity of service accessibility. Ann. Appl. Stat. 5 2024–2051.
  • Shah, I. and Lisi, F. (2018). Forecasting of electricity price through a functional prediction of supply and demand curves. Working paper.
  • Sheather, S. J. and Jones, M. C. (1991). A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimation. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 53 683–690.
  • Thoenes, S. (2014). Understanding the determinants of electricity prices and the impact of the German nuclear moratorium in 2011. Energy J. 35 61–78.
  • Venables, W. N. and Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th ed. Springer, New York.
  • Vsevolozhskaya, O., Greenwood, M. and Holodov, D. (2014). Pairwise comparison of treatment levels in functional analysis of variance with application to erythrocyte hemolysis. Ann. Appl. Stat. 8 905–925.
  • Wagner, C. H. (1982). Simpson’s paradox in real life. Amer. Statist. 36 46–48.
  • Yao, F., Müller, H.-G. and Wang, J.-L. (2005). Functional data analysis for sparse longitudinal data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 100 577–590.
  • Zhang, J.-T. and Chen, J. (2007). Statistical inferences for functional data. Ann. Statist. 35 1052–1079.
  • Zhang, X. and Wang, J.-L. (2016). From sparse to dense functional data and beyond. Ann. Statist. 44 2281–2321.
  • Zhang, W. and Wei, Y. (2015). Regression based principal component analysis for sparse functional data with applications to screening growth paths. Ann. Appl. Stat. 9 597–620.

Supplemental materials

  • Supplement A: R-codes and data. This supplementary material contains the R codes of the real data application and simulated data which closely resembles the original data set.
  • Supplement B: Supplementary paper. This supplementary paper contains the proofs of our theoretical results and a detailed description of the data sources.