The Annals of Applied Statistics
- Ann. Appl. Stat.
- Volume 12, Number 3 (2018), 1773-1795.
Estimating and comparing cancer progression risks under varying surveillance protocols
Jane M. Lange, Roman Gulati, Amy S. Leonardson, Daniel W. Lin, Lisa F. Newcomb, Bruce J. Trock, H. Ballentine Carter, Peter R. Carroll, Matthew R. Cooperberg, Janet E. Cowan, Lawrence H. Klotz, and Ruth Etzioni
Outcomes after cancer diagnosis and treatment are often observed at discrete times via doctor-patient encounters or specialized diagnostic examinations. Despite their ubiquity as endpoints in cancer studies, such outcomes pose challenges for analysis. In particular, comparisons between studies or patient populations with different surveillance schema may be confounded by differences in visit frequencies. We present a statistical framework based on multistate and hidden Markov models that represents events on a continuous time scale given data with discrete observation times. To demonstrate this framework, we consider the problem of comparing risks of prostate cancer progression across multiple active surveillance cohorts with different surveillance frequencies. We show that the different surveillance schedules partially explain observed differences in the progression risks between cohorts. Our application permits the conclusion that differences in underlying cancer progression risks across cohorts persist after accounting for different surveillance frequencies.
Ann. Appl. Stat., Volume 12, Number 3 (2018), 1773-1795.
Received: May 2017
Revised: September 2017
First available in Project Euclid: 11 September 2018
Permanent link to this document
Digital Object Identifier
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
Lange, Jane M.; Gulati, Roman; Leonardson, Amy S.; Lin, Daniel W.; Newcomb, Lisa F.; Trock, Bruce J.; Carter, H. Ballentine; Carroll, Peter R.; Cooperberg, Matthew R.; Cowan, Janet E.; Klotz, Lawrence H.; Etzioni, Ruth. Estimating and comparing cancer progression risks under varying surveillance protocols. Ann. Appl. Stat. 12 (2018), no. 3, 1773--1795. doi:10.1214/17-AOAS1130. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoas/1536652974
- Supplement A: Maximum likelihood estimation. Description of the expectation-maximization algorithm used to estimate model parameters.
- Supplement B: Sample description. Description of the four active surveillance cohorts after exclusions.
- Supplement C: Parameter estimates. Model parameter estimates assuming 100% biopsy sensitivity and specificity.
- Supplement D: Model selection. BIC model selection for the four active surveillance cohorts, assuming 60%, 75%, and 90% sensitivity and 100% specifcity.
- Supplement E: Additional figures. Sensitivity analysis for estimates of upgrading probabilities.