Project Euclid

References

• Acerbi, C. and Szekely, B. (2014). Backtesting expected shortfall. Risk Mag. December 76–81.
• Andrews, D. W. K. (1991). Heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimation. Econometrica 59 817–858.
• Bank for International Settlements (2013). Consultative document: Fundamental review of the trading book: A revised marked risk framework. Available at http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs265.pdf.
• Bank for International Settlements (2014). Consultative document: Fundamental review of the trading book: Outstanding issues. Available at http://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d305.pdf.
• Bellini, F. and Bignozzi, V. (2015). On elicitable risk measures. Quant. Finance 15 725–733.
• Bellini, F. and Di Bernardino, E. (2017). Risk management with expectiles. Eur. J. Finance 23 487–506.
• Bellini, F., Klar, B., Müller, A. and Gianin, E. R. (2014). Generalized quantiles as risk measures. Insurance Math. Econom. 54 41–48.
• Bollerslev, T. and Wooldridge, J. M. (1992). Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation and inference in dynamic models with time-varying covariances. Econometric Rev. 11 143–172.
• Christoffersen, P. F. (1998). Evaluating interval forecasts. Internat. Econom. Rev. 39 841–862.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1661906
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/2527341
  
• Christoffersen, P. (2003). Elements of Financial Risk Management. Academic Press.
• Cont, R., Deguest, R. and Scandolo, G. (2010). Robustness and sensitivity analysis of risk measurement procedures. Quant. Finance 10 593–606.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2676786
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1080/14697681003685597
  
• Costanzino, N. and Curran, M. (2015). Backtesting general spectral risk measures with application to expected shortfall. Journal of Risk Model Validation 9 21–33.
• Davis, M. H. A. (2016). Verification of internal risk measure estimates. Stat. Risk Model. 33 67–93.
• Delbaen, F., Bellini, F., Bignozzi, V. and Ziegel, J. F. (2016). Risk measures with the CxLS property. Finance Stoch. 20 433–453.
• Diebold, F. X., Gunther, T. A. and Tay, A. S. (1998). Evaluating density forecasts with applications to financial risk management. Internat. Econom. Rev. 39 863–883.
• Diebold, F. X. and Mariano, R. S. (1995). Comparing predictive accuracy. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 13 253–263.
• Diebold, F. X., Schuermann, T. and Stroughair, J. D. (2000). Pitfalls and opportunities in the use of extreme value theory in risk management. J. Risk Finance 1 30–35.
• Efron, B. (1991). Regression percentiles using asymmetric squared error loss. Statist. Sinica 1 93–125.
• Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 57. Chapman & Hall, New York.
• Ehm, W., Gneiting, T., Jordan, A. and Krüger, F. (2016). Of quantiles and expectiles: Consistent scoring functions, Choquet representations and forecast rankings. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 78 505–562.
• Embrechts, P., Klüppelberg, C. and Mikosch, T. (1997). Modelling Extremal Events for Insurance and Finance. Applications of Mathematics (New York) 33. Springer, Berlin.
• Emmer, S., Kratz, M. and Tasche, D. (2015). What is the best risk measure in practice? A comparison of standard measures. J. Risk 18 31–60.
• Engle, R. F. and Manganelli, S. (2004). CAViaR: Conditional autoregressive value at risk by regression quantiles. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 22 367–381.
• Fernández, C. and Steel, M. F. J. (1998). On Bayesian modeling of fat tails and skewness. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 93 359–371.
• Fissler, T. and Ziegel, J. F. (2016). Higher order elicitability and Osband’s principle. Ann. Statist. 44 1680–1707.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR3519937
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/16-AOS1439
  Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1467894712
  
• Fissler, T., Ziegel, J. F. and Gneiting, T. (2016). Expected shortfall is jointly elicitable with value at risk—implications for backtesting. Risk Mag. January 58–61.
• Föllmer, H. and Schied, A. (2002). Convex measures of risk and trading constraints. Finance Stoch. 6 429–447.
• Frongillo, R. and Kash, I. (2015). Vector-valued property elicitation. In Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Learning Theory (S. Kale, P. Grünwald and E. Hazan, eds.). JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings 40.
• Giacomini, R. and White, H. (2006). Tests of conditional predictive ability. Econometrica 74 1545–1578.
• Gneiting, T. (2011). Making and evaluating point forecasts. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 106 746–762.
• Gneiting, T. and Ranjan, R. (2011). Comparing density forecasts using threshold- and quantile-weighted scoring rules. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29 411–422.
• Holzmann, H. and Eulert, M. (2014). The role of the information set for forecasting—with applications to risk management. Ann. Appl. Stat. 8 595–621.
• Hommel, G. (1983). Tests of the overall hypothesis for arbitrary dependence structures. Biom. J. 25 423–430.
• Koenker, R. (2005). Quantile Regression. Econometric Society Monographs 38. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
• Kou, S. and Peng, X. (2016). On the measurement of economic tail risk. Oper. Res. 64 1056–1072.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR3558435
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1287/opre.2016.1539
  
• Kuan, C.-M., Yeh, J.-H. and Hsu, Y.-C. (2009). Assessing value at risk with CARE, the conditional autoregressive expectile models. J. Econometrics 150 261–270.
• Kuester, K., Mittnik, S. and Paolella, M. S. (2006). Value-at-risk prediction: A comparison of alternative strategies. J. Financ. Econom. 4 53–89.
• Lambert, N. (2013). Elicitation and evaluation of statistical functionals. Preprint. Available at https://web.stanford.edu/~nlambert/papers/elicitation_july2013.pdf.
• Lambert, N., Pennock, D. M. and Shoham, Y. (2008). Eliciting properties of probability distributions. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce 129–138. Chicago, IL. Extended abstract.
• McNeil, A. J. and Frey, R. (2000). Estimation of tail-related risk measures for heteroscedastic financial time series: An extreme value approach. J. Empir. Finance 7 271–300.
• McNeil, A. J., Frey, R. and Embrechts, P. (2005). Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools. Princeton Series in Finance. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
• Nau, R. F. (1985). Should scoring rules be “effective”? Manage. Sci. 31 527–535.
• Newey, W. K. and Powell, J. L. (1987). Asymmetric least squares estimation and testing. Econometrica 55 819–847.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR906565
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/1911031
  
• Nolde, N. and Ziegel, J. F. (2017). Supplement to “Elicitability and backtesting: Perspectives for banking regulation”. DOI:10.1214/17-AOAS1041SUPP.
• Osband, K. H. (1985). Providing incentives for better cost forecasting. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. California, Berkeley.
• Patton, A. J. (2006). Volatility forecast comparison using imperfect volatility proxies. Research Paper 175, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, Univ. Technology, Sydney.
• Patton, A. J. (2011). Volatility forecast comparison using imperfect volatility proxies. J. Econometrics 160 246–256.
• Patton, A. J. (2014). Evaluating and comparing possibly misspecified forecasts. Working paper.
• Patton, A. J. and Sheppard, K. (2009). Evaluating volatility and correlation forecasts. In Handbook of Financial Time Series (T. Mikosch, J.-P. Kreiss, R. A. Davis and T. G. Andersen, eds.) 801–838. Springer, Berlin.
• R Core Team (2015). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at http://www.R-project.org/.
• Rosenblatt, M. (1952). Remarks on a multivariate transformation. Ann. Math. Stat. 23 470–472.
• Saerens, M. (2000). Building cost functions minimizing to some summary statistics. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 11 1263–1271.
• Steinwart, I., Pasin, C., Williamson, R. and Zhang, S. (2014). Elicitation and identification of properties. J. Mach. Learn. Res. Workshop Conf. Proc. 35 1–45.
• Strähl, C. and Ziegel, J. (2017). Cross-calibration of probabilistic forecasts. Electron. J. Stat. 11 608–639.
• Thomson, W. (1979). Eliciting production possibilities from a well-informed manager. J. Econom. Theory 20 360–380.
• Tsyplakov, A. (2014). Theoretical guidelines for a partially informed forecast examiner. MPRA Paper, 55017. Available at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/55017.
• Wang, R. and Ziegel, J. F. (2015). Elicitable distortion risk measures: A concise proof. Statist. Probab. Lett. 100 172–175.
• Weber, S. (2006). Distribution-invariant risk measures, information, and dynamic consistency. Math. Finance 16 419–441.
• Ziegel, J. F. (2016). Coherence and elicitability. Math. Finance 26 901–918.