Annals of Applied Statistics

Quantifying the spatial inequality and temporal trends in maternal smoking rates in Glasgow

Duncan Lee and Andrew Lawson

Full-text: Open access

Abstract

Maternal smoking is well known to adversely affect birth outcomes, and there is considerable spatial variation in the rates of maternal smoking in the city of Glasgow, Scotland. This spatial variation is a partial driver of health inequalities between rich and poor communities, and it is of interest to determine the extent to which these inequalities have changed over time. Therefore in this paper we develop a Bayesian hierarchical model for estimating the spatio-temporal pattern in smoking incidence across Glasgow between 2000 and 2013, which can identify the changing geographical extent of clusters of areas exhibiting elevated maternal smoking incidences that partially drive health inequalities. Additionally, we provide freely available software via the R package CARBayesST to allow others to implement the model we have developed. The study period includes the introduction of a ban on smoking in public places in 2006, and the results show an average decline of around 11% in maternal smoking rates over the study period.

Article information

Source
Ann. Appl. Stat., Volume 10, Number 3 (2016), 1427-1446.

Dates
Received: July 2015
Revised: April 2016
First available in Project Euclid: 28 September 2016

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoas/1475069613

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1214/16-AOAS941

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR3553230

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
06775272

Keywords
Cluster detection maternal smoking spatial inequality spatio-temporal modelling

Citation

Lee, Duncan; Lawson, Andrew. Quantifying the spatial inequality and temporal trends in maternal smoking rates in Glasgow. Ann. Appl. Stat. 10 (2016), no. 3, 1427--1446. doi:10.1214/16-AOAS941. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoas/1475069613


Export citation

References

  • Anderson, C., Lee, D. and Dean, N. (2014). Identifying clusters in Bayesian disease mapping. Biostat. 15 457–469.
  • Bauld, L., Ferguson, J., Lawson, L., Chesterman, J. and Judge, K. (2005). Tackling smoking in Glasgow. Technical report, Glasgow Centre for Population Health.
  • Charras-Garrido, M., Abrial, D. and de Goer, J. (2012). Classification method for disease risk mapping based on discrete hidden Markov random fields. Biostat. 13 241–255.
  • Charras-Garrido, M., Azizi, L., Forbes, F., Doyle, S., Peyrard, N. and Abrial, D. (2013). On the difficulty to delimit disease risk hot sports. Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 22 99–105.
  • Choi, J., Lawson, A. B., Cai, B. and Hossain, Md. M. (2011). Evaluation of Bayesian spatiotemporal latent models in small area health data. Environmetrics 22 1008–1022.
  • Cnattingius, S. (2004). The epidemiology of smoking during pregnancy: Smoking prevalence, maternal characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes. Nicotine Tob. Res. 6 Suppl 2 S125–S140.
  • Eilers, P. H. C. and Marx, B. D. (1996). Flexible smoothing with $B$-splines and penalties. Statist. Sci. 11 89–121.
  • Forbes, F., Charras-Garrido, M., Azizi, L., Doyle, S. and Abrial, D. (2013). Spatial risk mapping for rare disease with hidden Markov fields and variational EM. Ann. Appl. Stat. 7 1192–1216.
  • Gangnon, R. and Clayton, M. (2000). Bayesian detection and modeling of spatial disease clustering. Biometrics 56 922–935.
  • Gormley, I. C. and Murphy, T. B. (2008). A mixture of experts model for rank data with applications in election studies. Ann. Appl. Stat. 2 1452–1477.
  • Gray, L. and Leyland, A. (2009). “Glasgow effect” of cigarette smoking explained by socio-economic status? A multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health 9 245.
  • Gray, R., Bonellie, S., Chalmers, J., Greer, I., Jarvis, S., Kurinczuk, J. and Williams, C. (2009). Contribution of smoking during pregnancy to inequalities in stillbirth and infant death in Scotland 1994–2003: Retrospective population based study using hospital maternity records. British Medical Journal 339 b3754.
  • Gray, L., Merlo, J., Mindell, J., Hallqvist, J., Tafforeau, J., O’Reilly, D., Regidor, E., Naess, O., Kelleher, C., Helakorpi, S., Lange, C. and Leyland, A. (2012). International differences in self-reported health measures in 33 major metropolitan areas in Europe. European Journal of Public Health 22 40–47.
  • Green, P. J. and Richardson, S. (2002). Hidden Markov models and disease mapping. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 97 1055–1070.
  • Knorr-Held, L. (2000). Bayesian modelling of inseparable space–time variation in disease risk. Stat. Med. 19 2555–2567.
  • Knorr-Held, L. and Raßer, G. (2000). Bayesian detection of clusters and discontinuities in disease maps. Biometrics 56 13–21.
  • Kramer, M., Seguin, L., Lydon, J. and Goulet, L. (2000). Socio-economic disparities in pregnancy outcome: Why do the poor fare so poorly? Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 14 194–210.
  • Kulldorff, M., Heffernan, R., Hartman, J., Assuncao, R. and Mostashari, F. (2005). A space-time permutation scan statistic for disease outbreak detection. PLoS Med. 2 216–224.
  • Lawson, A. B. (2009). Bayesian Disease Mapping: Hierarchical Modeling in Spatial Epidemiology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  • Lawson, A. B., Choi, J., Cai, B., Hossain, M., Kirby, R. S. and Liu, J. (2012). Bayesian 2-stage space-time mixture modeling with spatial misalignment of the exposure in small area health data. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 17 417–441.
  • Lee, D. and Lawson, A. (2016). Supplement to “Quantifying the spatial inequality and temporal trends in maternal smoking rates in Glasgow.” DOI:10.1214/16-AOAS941SUPPA, DOI:10.1214/16-AOAS941SUPPB.
  • Leroux, B. G., Lei, X. and Breslow, N. (2000). Estimation of disease rates in small areas: A new mixed model for spatial dependence. In Statistical Models in Epidemiology, the Environment, and Clinical Trials (Minneapolis, MN, 1997). IMA Vol. Math. Appl. 116 179–191. Springer, New York.
  • Li, G., Best, N., Hansell, A., Ahmed, I. and Richardson, S. (2012). BaySTDetect: Detecting unusual temporal patterns in small area data via Bayesian model choice. Biostat. 13 695–710.
  • Mackay, D., Nelson, S., Haw, S. and Pell, J. (2012). Impact of Scotland’s smoke-free llegislation on pregnancy complications: Retrospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 9 e1001175.
  • Passmore, E., McGuire, R., Correll, P. and Bentley, J. (2015). Demographic factors associated with smoking cessation during pregnancy in New South Wales, Australia, 2000–2011. BMC Public Health 15 398.
  • Rand, W. (1971). Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 66 846–850.
  • Rushworth, A., Lee, D. and Mitchell, R. (2014). A spatio-temporal model for estimating the long-term effects of air pollution on respiratory hospital admissions in Greater London. Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology 10 29–38.
  • Silveira, M., Matijasevich, A., Menezes, A., Horta, B., Santos, I., Darros, A., Barros, F. and Victora, C. (2016). Secular trends in smoking during pregnancy according to income and ethnic group: Four population-based perinatal surveys in a Brazilian city. BMJ Open 6 e010127.
  • Tappin, D., MacAskill, S., Bauld, L., Eadie, D., Shipton, D. and Galbraith, L. (2010). Smoking prevalence and smoking cessation services for pregnant women in Scotland. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention and Policy 5 1.
  • R Core Team (2013). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  • Ugarte, D., Etxeberria, J., Goicoa, T. and Ardanaz, E. (2012). Gender-specific spatio-temporal patterns of colorectal cancer incidence in Navarre, Spain (1990–2005). Cancer Epidemiol. 36 254–262.
  • Wakefield, J. and Kim, A. (2013). A Bayesian model for cluster detection. Biostat. 14 752–765.
  • Wang, X., Zuckerman, B., Pearson, C., Kaufman, G., Chen, C., Wang, G., Niu, T., Wise, P., Bauchner, H. and Xu, X. (2002). Maternal cigarette smoking, metabolic gene polymorphism, and infant birth weight. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 287 195–202.
  • Watanabe, S. (2010). Asymptotic equivalence of Bayes cross validation and widely applicable information criterion in singular learning theory. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11 3571–3594.
  • Williamson, D., Serdula, M., Kendrick, J. and Binkin, N. (1989). Comparing the prevalence of smoking in pregnant and nonpregnant women. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 261 70–74.

Supplemental materials

  • Supplement A: Additional results and data analysis. Section 2 illustrates the use of the (non-data augmented) proposed model via the CARBayesST package on simulated data. Section 3 provides an additional simulation study that assesses the efficacy of the model with data augmentation. Section 4 presents example realisations of the simulated data. Section 5 presents posterior summaries of the hyperparameters from the Glasgow study, while Section 6 presents additional sensitivity analyses.
  • Supplement B: Additional files for running the proposed model on simulated data. R code and data for running the model proposed in Section 3 on simulated data.