Annals of Applied Statistics
- Ann. Appl. Stat.
- Volume 9, Number 4 (2015), 2153-2178.
BFLCRM: A Bayesian functional linear Cox regression model for predicting time to conversion to Alzheimer’s disease
The aim of this paper is to develop a Bayesian functional linear Cox regression model (BFLCRM) with both functional and scalar covariates. This new development is motivated by establishing the likelihood of conversion to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in 346 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) enrolled in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 1 (ADNI-1) and the early markers of conversion. These 346 MCI patients were followed over 48 months, with 161 MCI participants progressing to AD at 48 months. The functional linear Cox regression model was used to establish that functional covariates including hippocampus surface morphology and scalar covariates including brain MRI volumes, cognitive performance (ADAS-Cog) and APOE-$\varepsilon4$ status can accurately predict time to onset of AD. Posterior computation proceeds via an efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm. A simulation study is performed to evaluate the finite sample performance of BFLCRM.
Ann. Appl. Stat., Volume 9, Number 4 (2015), 2153-2178.
Received: July 2014
Revised: August 2015
First available in Project Euclid: 28 January 2016
Permanent link to this document
Digital Object Identifier
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
Zentralblatt MATH identifier
Lee, Eunjee; Zhu, Hongtu; Kong, Dehan; Wang, Yalin; Sullivan Giovanello, Kelly; Ibrahim, Joseph G.; Neuroimaging Initiative, for the Alzheimer's Disease. BFLCRM: A Bayesian functional linear Cox regression model for predicting time to conversion to Alzheimer’s disease. Ann. Appl. Stat. 9 (2015), no. 4, 2153--2178. doi:10.1214/15-AOAS879. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoas/1453994196
- Supplement to “BFLFRM: A Bayesian functional linear Cox regression model for predicting time to conversion to Alzheimer’s disease”. This supplementary document contains additional results of ADNI-1 data analysis. Sensitivity analysis results for the full model were discussed for the purpose of evaluating the robustness of prior choice. As additional information, we interpreted the posterior quantities associated with the reduced models, Model 1, 2 and 3.