The Annals of Applied Probability

Equilibrium interfaces of biased voter models

Rongfeng Sun, Jan M. Swart, and Jinjiong Yu

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text

Abstract

A one-dimensional interacting particle system is said to exhibit interface tightness if starting in an initial condition describing the interface between two constant configurations of different types, the process modulo translations is positive recurrent. In a biological setting, this describes two populations that do not mix, and it is believed to be a common phenomenon in one-dimensional particle systems. Interface tightness has been proved for voter models satisfying a finite second moment condition on the rates. We extend this to biased voter models. Furthermore, we show that the distribution of the equilibrium interface for the biased voter model converges to that of the voter model when the bias parameter tends to zero. A key ingredient is an identity for the expected number of boundaries in the equilibrium voter model interface, which is of independent interest.

Article information

Source
Ann. Appl. Probab., Volume 29, Number 4 (2019), 2556-2593.

Dates
Received: April 2018
Revised: October 2018
First available in Project Euclid: 23 July 2019

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoap/1563869050

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1214/19-AAP1461

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR3984257

Subjects
Primary: 82C22: Interacting particle systems [See also 60K35] 60K35: Interacting random processes; statistical mechanics type models; percolation theory [See also 82B43, 82C43]
Secondary: 82C24: Interface problems; diffusion-limited aggregation 82C41: Dynamics of random walks, random surfaces, lattice animals, etc. [See also 60G50] 60K35: Interacting random processes; statistical mechanics type models; percolation theory [See also 82B43, 82C43]

Keywords
Biased voter model interface tightness branching and coalescing random walks

Citation

Sun, Rongfeng; Swart, Jan M.; Yu, Jinjiong. Equilibrium interfaces of biased voter models. Ann. Appl. Probab. 29 (2019), no. 4, 2556--2593. doi:10.1214/19-AAP1461. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoap/1563869050


Export citation

References

  • [1] Andjel, E., Mountford, T., Pimentel, L. P. R. and Valesin, D. (2010). Tightness for the interface of the one-dimensional contact process. Bernoulli 16 909–925.
  • [2] Athreya, S. R. and Sun, R. (2011). One-dimensional voter model interface revisited. Electron. Commun. Probab. 16 792–800.
  • [3] Belhaouari, S., Mountford, T., Sun, R. and Valle, G. (2006). Convergence results and sharp estimates for the voter model interfaces. Electron. J. Probab. 11 768–801.
  • [4] Belhaouari, S., Mountford, T. and Valle, G. (2007). Tightness for the interfaces of one-dimensional voter models. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 94 421–442.
  • [5] Bramson, M., Liggett, T. M. and Mountford, T. (2002). Characterization of stationary measures for one-dimensional exclusion processes. Ann. Probab. 30 1539–1575.
  • [6] Bramson, M. and Mountford, T. (2002). Stationary blocking measures for one-dimensional nonzero mean exclusion processes. Ann. Probab. 30 1082–1130.
  • [7] Cox, J. T. and Durrett, R. (1995). Hybrid zones and voter model interfaces. Bernoulli 1 343–370.
  • [8] Fontes, L. R. G., Isopi, M., Newman, C. M. and Ravishankar, K. (2004). The Brownian web: Characterization and convergence. Ann. Probab. 32 2857–2883.
  • [9] Kallenberg, O. (1997). Foundations of Modern Probability. Probability and Its Applications (New York). Springer, New York.
  • [10] Liggett, T. M. (1985). Interacting Particle Systems. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences] 276. Springer, New York.
  • [11] Menshikov, M., Popov, S. and Wade, A. (2017). Non-homogeneous Random Walks: Lyapunov Function Methods for Near-Critical Stochastic Systems. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 209. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
  • [12] Mountford, T. and Valesin, D. (2016). Functional central limit theorem for the interface of the symmetric multitype contact process. ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat. 13 481–519.
  • [13] Newman, C. M., Ravishankar, K. and Sun, R. (2005). Convergence of coalescing nonsimple random walks to the Brownian web. Electron. J. Probab. 10 21–60.
  • [14] Schertzer, E., Sun, R. and Swart, J. M. (2017). The Brownian web, the Brownian net, and their universality. In Advances in Disordered Systems, Random Processes and Some Applications 270–368. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
  • [15] Schwartz, D. L. (1977). Applications of duality to a class of Markov processes. Ann. Probab. 5 522–532.
  • [16] Sturm, A. and Swart, J. (2008). Voter models with heterozygosity selection. Ann. Appl. Probab. 18 59–99.
  • [17] Sturm, A. and Swart, J. M. (2008). Tightness of voter model interfaces. Electron. Commun. Probab. 13 165–174.
  • [18] Sturm, A. and Swart, J. M. (2015). A particle system with cooperative branching and coalescence. Ann. Appl. Probab. 25 1616–1649.
  • [19] Sun, R. and Swart, J. M. (2008). The Brownian net. Ann. Probab. 36 1153–1208.
  • [20] Valesin, D. (2010). Multitype contact process on $\mathbb{Z}$: Extinction and interface. Electron. J. Probab. 15 2220–2260.
  • [21] Williams, T. and Bjerknes, R. (1972). Stochastic model for abnormal clone spread through epithelial basal layer. Nature 236 19–21.