Open Access
February 2008 Evolutionarily stable strategies of random games, and the vertices of random polygons
Sergiu Hart, Yosef Rinott, Benjamin Weiss
Ann. Appl. Probab. 18(1): 259-287 (February 2008). DOI: 10.1214/07-AAP455

Abstract

An evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) is an equilibrium strategy that is immune to invasions by rare alternative (“mutant”) strategies. Unlike Nash equilibria, ESS do not always exist in finite games. In this paper we address the question of what happens when the size of the game increases: does an ESS exist for “almost every large” game? Letting the entries in the n×n game matrix be independently randomly chosen according to a distribution F, we study the number of ESS with support of size 2. In particular, we show that, as n→∞, the probability of having such an ESS: (i) converges to 1 for distributions F with “exponential and faster decreasing tails” (e.g., uniform, normal, exponential); and (ii) converges to $1-1/\sqrt{e}$ for distributions F with “slower than exponential decreasing tails” (e.g., lognormal, Pareto, Cauchy).

Our results also imply that the expected number of vertices of the convex hull of n random points in the plane converges to infinity for the distributions in (i), and to 4 for the distributions in (ii).

Citation

Download Citation

Sergiu Hart. Yosef Rinott. Benjamin Weiss. "Evolutionarily stable strategies of random games, and the vertices of random polygons." Ann. Appl. Probab. 18 (1) 259 - 287, February 2008. https://doi.org/10.1214/07-AAP455

Information

Published: February 2008
First available in Project Euclid: 9 January 2008

zbMATH: 1132.91352
MathSciNet: MR2380899
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/07-AAP455

Subjects:
Primary: 60D05 , 91A22
Secondary: 52A22 , 60F99

Keywords: Chen–Stein method , convex hull of random points , ESS , evolutionarily stable strategy , heavy-tailed distribution , Nash equilibrium , Poisson approximation , random game , random polytope , subexponential distribution , threshold phenomenon

Rights: Copyright © 2008 Institute of Mathematical Statistics

Vol.18 • No. 1 • February 2008
Back to Top