Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré, Probabilités et Statistiques

Limit law of a second class particle in TASEP with non-random initial condition

P. L. Ferrari, P. Ghosal, and P. Nejjar

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text


We consider the totally asymmetric simple exclusion process (TASEP) with non-random initial condition and density $\lambda$ on $\mathbb{Z}_{-}$ and $\rho$ on $\mathbb{Z}_{+}$, and a second class particle initially at the origin. For $\lambda<\rho$, there is a shock and the second class particle moves with speed $1-\lambda-\rho$. For large time $t$, we show that the position of the second class particle fluctuates on the $t^{1/3}$ scale and determine its limiting law. We also obtain the limiting distribution of the number of steps made by the second class particle until time $t$.


On considère le processus d’exclusion simple totalement asymétrique avec des condition initiales déterministes, densité $\lambda$ sur $\mathbb{Z}_{-}$ et $\rho$ sur $\mathbb{Z}_{+}$. Initialement on place une particule de deuxième classe à l’origine. Si $\lambda<\rho$, un choc est créé et la particule de deuxième classe le suit avec vitesse $1-\lambda-\rho$. Dans la limite $t\to\infty$, on démontre que les fluctuations de la position de la particule de deuxième classe sont de l’ordre $t^{1/3}$ et on obtient sa loi limite. On détermine aussi la loi limite du nombre de sauts faits par la particule de deuxième classe jusqu’à l’instant $t$.

Article information

Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Statist., Volume 55, Number 3 (2019), 1203-1225.

Received: 26 October 2017
Revised: 4 May 2018
Accepted: 21 May 2018
First available in Project Euclid: 25 September 2019

Permanent link to this document

Digital Object Identifier

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)

Zentralblatt MATH identifier

Primary: 82C22: Interacting particle systems [See also 60K35] 60K35: Interacting random processes; statistical mechanics type models; percolation theory [See also 82B43, 82C43] 60B20: Random matrices (probabilistic aspects; for algebraic aspects see 15B52)

Exclusion process Second class particle Shock Scaling limit KPZ universality class


Ferrari, P. L.; Ghosal, P.; Nejjar, P. Limit law of a second class particle in TASEP with non-random initial condition. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Statist. 55 (2019), no. 3, 1203--1225. doi:10.1214/18-AIHP916.

Export citation


  • [1] J. Baik, G. Ben Arous and S. Péché. Phase transition of the largest eigenvalue for non-null complex sample covariance matrices. Ann. Probab. 33 (2005) 1643–1697.
  • [2] J. Baik, P. L. Ferrari and S. Péché. Convergence of the two-point function of the stationary TASEP. In Singular Phenomena and Scaling in Mathematical Models 91–110. Springer, Berlin, 2014.
  • [3] M. Balázs, E. Cator and T. Seppäläinen. Cube root fluctuations for the corner growth model associated to the exclusion process. Electron. J. Probab. 11 (2006) 1094–1132.
  • [4] A. Borodin and V. Gorin. Lectures on integrable probability, 2012. Available at arXiv:1212.3351.
  • [5] A. Borodin and S. Shlosman. Gibbs ensembles of nonintersecting paths. Comm. Math. Phys. 293 (2010) 145–170.
  • [6] E. Cator and L. Pimentel. On the local fluctuations of last-passage percolation models. Stochastic Process. Appl. 125 (2015) 879–903.
  • [7] I. Corwin. The Kardar–Parisi–Zhang equation and universality class. Random Matrices Theory Appl. 1 (2012) 1130001.
  • [8] I. Corwin, P. L. Ferrari and S. Péché. Universality of slow decorrelation in KPZ models. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. 48 (2012) 134–150.
  • [9] P. A. Ferrari. Shock fluctuations in asymmetric simple exclusion. Probab. Theory Related Fields 91 (1992) 81–101.
  • [10] P. A. Ferrari and L. Fontes. Shock fluctuations in the asymmetric simple exclusion process. Probab. Theory Related Fields 99 (1994) 305–319.
  • [11] P. A. Ferrari and C. Kipnis. Second class particles in the rarefaction fan. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 31 (1995) 143–154.
  • [12] P. A. Ferrari, J. B. Martin and L. P. R. Pimentel. A phase transition for competition interfaces. Ann. Appl. Probab. 19 (2009) 281–317.
  • [13] P. A. Ferrari and L. P. R. Pimentel. Competition interfaces and second class particles. Ann. Probab. 33 (2005) 1235–1254.
  • [14] P. L. Ferrari. Polynuclear growth on a flat substrate and edge scaling of GOE eigenvalues. Comm. Math. Phys. 252 (2004) 77–109.
  • [15] P. L. Ferrari. Slow decorrelations in KPZ growth. J. Stat. Mech. (2008) P07022.
  • [16] P. L. Ferrari. From interacting particle systems to random matrices. J. Stat. Mech. (2010) P10016.
  • [17] P. L. Ferrari and P. Nejjar. Anomalous shock fluctuations in TASEP and last passage percolation models. Probab. Theory Related Fields 161 (2015) 61–109.
  • [18] P. L. Ferrari and P. Nejjar. Fluctuations of the competition interface in presence of shocks. ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat. 14 (2017) 299–325.
  • [19] P. L. Ferrari and A. Occelli. Universality of the GOE Tracy–Widom distribution for TASEP with arbitrary particle density. Preprint, 2017. Available at arXiv:1704.01291.
  • [20] P. L. Ferrari and H. Spohn. Scaling limit for the space–time covariance of the stationary totally asymmetric simple exclusion process. Comm. Math. Phys. 265 (2006) 1–44.
  • [21] P. L. Ferrari and H. Spohn. Random growth models. In The Oxford Handbook of Random Matrix Theory 782–801. G. Akemann, J. Baik and P. Di Francesco (Eds). Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2011.
  • [22] J. Gärtner and E. Presutti. Shock fluctuations in a particle system. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré A, Phys. Théor. 53 (1990) 1–14.
  • [23] K. Johansson. Shape fluctuations and random matrices. Comm. Math. Phys. 209 (2000) 437–476.
  • [24] M. Kardar, G. Parisi and Y. Z. Zhang. Dynamic scaling of growing interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 889–892.
  • [25] T. M. Liggett. Interacting Particle Systems. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1985.
  • [26] T. M. Liggett. Stochastic Interacting Systems: Contact, Voter and Exclusion Processes. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1999.
  • [27] T. Mountford and H. Guiol. The motion of a second class particle for the TASEP starting from a decreasing shock profile. Ann. Appl. Probab. 15 (2005) 1227–1259.
  • [28] P. Nejjar. Transition to shocks in TASEP and decoupling of last passage times. Preprint, 2017. Available at arXiv:1705.08836.
  • [29] L. P. R. Pimentel. Local behavior of airy processes. Preprint, 2017. Available at arXiv:1704.01903.
  • [30] M. Prähofer and H. Spohn. Universal distributions for growth processes in $1+1$ dimensions and random matrices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 4882–4885.
  • [31] M. Prähofer and H. Spohn. Current fluctuations for the totally asymmetric simple exclusion process. In In and Out of Equilibrium, V. Sidoravicius (Ed.). Progress in Probability. Birkhäuser, Basel, 2002.
  • [32] J. Quastel. Introduction to KPZ. In Current Developments in Mathematics 125–194, 2012.
  • [33] J. Quastel and H. Spohn. The one-dimensional KPZ equation and its universality class. J. Stat. Phys. 160 (2015) 965–984.
  • [34] C. A. Tracy and H. Widom. On orthogonal and symplectic matrix ensembles. Comm. Math. Phys. 177 (1996) 727–754.