Algebraic & Geometric Topology

Spin, statistics, orientations, unitarity

Theo Johnson-Freyd

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

However, an active subscription may be available with MSP at msp.org/agt.

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text

Abstract

A topological quantum field theory is hermitian if it is both oriented and complex-valued, and orientation-reversal agrees with complex conjugation. A field theory satisfies spin-statistics if it is both spin and super, and 360–rotation of the spin structure agrees with the operation of flipping the signs of all fermions. We set up a framework in which these two notions are precisely analogous. In this framework, field theories are defined over  Vect, but rather than being defined in terms of a single tangential structure, they are defined in terms of a bundle of tangential structures over Spec(). Bundles of tangential structures may be étale-locally equivalent without being equivalent, and hermitian field theories are nothing but the field theories controlled by the unique nontrivial bundle of tangential structures that is étale-locally equivalent to Orientations. This bundle owes its existence to the fact that π1 ét(Spec()) = π1 BO(). We interpret Deligne’s “existence of super fiber functors” theorem as implying that π2 ét(Spec()) = π2 BO() in a categorification of algebraic geometry in which symmetric monoidal categories replace commutative rings. One finds that there are eight bundles of tangential structures étale-locally equivalent to Spins, one of which is distinguished; upon unpacking the meaning of a field theory with that distinguished tangential structure, one arrives at a field theory that is both hermitian and satisfies spin-statistics. Finally, we formulate in our framework a notion of reflection-positivity and prove that if an étale-locally-oriented field theory is reflection-positive then it is necessarily hermitian, and if an étale-locally-spin field theory is reflection-positive then it necessarily both satisfies spin-statistics and is hermitian. The latter result is a topological version of the famous spin-statistics theorem.

Article information

Source
Algebr. Geom. Topol., Volume 17, Number 2 (2017), 917-956.

Dates
Received: 28 October 2015
Revised: 6 June 2016
Accepted: 24 June 2016
First available in Project Euclid: 19 October 2017

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.agt/1508431449

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.2140/agt.2017.17.917

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR3623677

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
1361.81142

Subjects
Primary: 14A22: Noncommutative algebraic geometry [See also 16S38] 57R56: Topological quantum field theories 81T50: Anomalies

Keywords
TQFT spin super categorification torsors Galois theory

Citation

Johnson-Freyd, Theo. Spin, statistics, orientations, unitarity. Algebr. Geom. Topol. 17 (2017), no. 2, 917--956. doi:10.2140/agt.2017.17.917. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.agt/1508431449


Export citation

References

  • M Atiyah, Topological quantum field theories, Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 68 (1988) 175–186
  • D Ayala, Geometric cobordism categories, PhD thesis, Stanford University (2009) Available at \setbox0\makeatletter\@url http://search.proquest.com/docview/304999097 {\unhbox0
  • D Ayala, J Francis, Factorization homology of topological manifolds, J. Topol. 8 (2015) 1045–1084
  • J,C Baez, J Dolan, From finite sets to Feynman diagrams, from “Mathematics unlimited–-2001 and beyond” (B Engquist, W Schmid, editors), Springer, Berlin (2001) 29–50
  • G,J Bird, Limits in $2$–categories of locally presentable categories, PhD thesis, University of Sydney (1984) Available at \setbox0\makeatletter\@url http://maths.mq.edu.au/~street/BirdPhD.pdf {\unhbox0
  • M Brandenburg, A Chirvasitu, T Johnson-Freyd, Reflexivity and dualizability in categorified linear algebra, Theory Appl. Categ. 30 (2015) 808–835
  • D Calaque, C Scheimbauer, A note on the $(\infty,n)$–category of cobordisms, preprint (2015)
  • A Chirvasitu, T Johnson-Freyd, The fundamental pro-groupoid of an affine $2$–scheme, Appl. Categ. Structures 21 (2013) 469–522
  • P Deligne, Catégories tensorielles, Mosc. Math. J. 2 (2002) 227–248
  • C,L Douglas, C Schommer-Pries, N Snyder, The balanced tensor product of module categories, preprint (2014)
  • S Eilenberg, Abstract description of some basic functors, J. Indian Math. Soc. 24 (1960) 231–234
  • D,S Freed, M,J Hopkins, Reflection positivity and invertible topological phases, preprint (2016)
  • N Ganter, M Kapranov, Symmetric and exterior powers of categories, Transform. Groups 19 (2014) 57–103
  • R Haugseng, Iterated spans and “classical” topological field theories, preprint (2014)
  • M Kapranov, Supergeometry in mathematics and physics, preprint (2015)
  • G,M Kelly, Basic concepts of enriched category theory, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 64, Cambridge University Press (1982)
  • A Kleshchev, Linear and projective representations of symmetric groups, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 163, Cambridge University Press (2005)
  • L,G Lewis, Jr, When projective does not imply flat, and other homological anomalies, Theory Appl. Categ. 5 (1999) 202–250
  • D Li-Bland, The stack of higher internal categories and stacks of iterated spans, preprint (2015)
  • J Lurie, On the classification of topological field theories, from “Current developments in mathematics” (D Jerison, B Mazur, T Mrowka, W Schmid, R Stanley, S-T Yau, editors), Int. Press, Somerville, MA (2009) 129–280
  • V Ostrik, On symmetric fusion categories in positive characteristic, preprint (2015)
  • C,J Schommer-Pries, The classification of two-dimensional extended topological field theories, PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley (2009) Available at \setbox0\makeatletter\@url \unhbox0
  • G Segal, The definition of conformal field theory, from “Topology, geometry and quantum field theory” (U Tillmann, editor), London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 308, Cambridge University Press (2004) 421–577
  • S Stolz, P Teichner, Supersymmetric field theories and generalized cohomology, from “Mathematical foundations of quantum field theory and perturbative string theory” (H Sati, U Schreiber, editors), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 83, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI (2011) 279–340
  • R,F Streater, A,S Wightman, PCT, spin and statistics, and all that, W,A Benjamin, New York (1964)
  • C,E Watts, Intrinsic characterizations of some additive functors, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 11 (1960) 5–8