Annals of Functional Analysis

Hyperrigid operator systems and Hilbert modules

P. Shankar and A. K. Vijayarajan

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text

Abstract

It is shown that, for an operator algebra A, the operator system S=A+A in the C-algebra C(S), and any representation ρ of C(S) on a Hilbert space H, the restriction ρ|S has a unique extension property if and only if the Hilbert module H over A is both orthogonally projective and orthogonally injective. As a corollary we deduce that, when S is separable, the hyperrigidity of S is equivalent to the Hilbert modules over A being both orthogonally projective and orthogonally injective.

Article information

Source
Ann. Funct. Anal., Volume 8, Number 1 (2017), 133-141.

Dates
Received: 17 February 2016
Accepted: 1 August 2016
First available in Project Euclid: 12 November 2016

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.afa/1478919627

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1215/20088752-3773182

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR3572336

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
1369.46051

Subjects
Primary: 46L07: Operator spaces and completely bounded maps [See also 47L25]
Secondary: 46L52: Noncommutative function spaces 46L89: Other "noncommutative" mathematics based on C-algebra theory [See also 58B32, 58B34, 58J22]

Keywords
operator system Hilbert module hyperrigidity unique extension property

Citation

Shankar, P.; Vijayarajan, A. K. Hyperrigid operator systems and Hilbert modules. Ann. Funct. Anal. 8 (2017), no. 1, 133--141. doi:10.1215/20088752-3773182. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.afa/1478919627


Export citation

References

  • [1] W. B. Arveson, Subalgebras of $C^{*}$-algebras, Acta Math. 123 (1969), 141–224.
  • [2] W. B. Arveson, The noncommutative Choquet boundary II: Hyperrigidity, Israel J. Math. 184 (2011), 349–385.
  • [3] D. Blecher, Z. J. Ruan, and A. Sinclair, A characterization of operator algebras, J. Funct. Anal. 89 (1990), 188–201.
  • [4] M. D. Choi and E. Effros, Injectivity and operator spaces, J. Funct. Anal. 24 (1977), 156–209.
  • [5] M. Dritschel and S. McCullough, Boundary representations for families of representations of operator algebras and spaces, J. Operator Theory 53 (2005), no. 1, 159–167.
  • [6] M. Hamana, Injective envelopes of operator systems, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 15 (1979), 773–785.
  • [7] C. Kleski, Korovkin-type properties for completely positive maps, Illinois J. Math. 58 (2014), no. 4, 1107–1116.
  • [8] P. Muhly and B. Solel, Hilbert Modules Over Operator Algebras, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 117, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1995.
  • [9] P. Muhly and B. Solel, “An algebraic characterization of boundary representations” in Nonselfadjoint Operator Algebras, Operator Theory, and Related Topics, Oper. Theory Adv. Appl. 104, Birkhauser, Basel, 1998, 189–196.
  • [10] D. Sarason, On spectral sets having connected complement, Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 26 (1965), 289–299.