Abstract and Applied Analysis

A Data Mining Approach for Visual and Analytical Identification of Neurorehabilitation Ranges in Traumatic Brain Injury Cognitive Rehabilitation

Alejandro García-Rudolph and Karina Gibert

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text


Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a critical public health and socioeconomic problem throughout the world. Cognitive rehabilitation (CR) has become the treatment of choice for cognitive impairments after TBI. It consists of hierarchically organized tasks that require repetitive use of impaired cognitive functions. One important focus for CR professionals is the number of repetitions and the type of task performed throughout treatment leading to functional recovery. However, very little research is available that quantifies the amount and type of practice. The Neurorehabilitation Range (NRR) and the Sectorized and Annotated Plane (SAP) have been introduced as a means of identifying formal operational models in order to provide therapists with decision support information for assigning the most appropriate CR plan. In this paper we present a novel methodology based on combining SAP and NRR to solve what we call the Neurorehabilitation Range Maximal Regions (NRRMR) problem and to generate analytical and visual tools enabling the automatic identification of NRR. A new SAP representation is introduced and applied to overcome the drawbacks identified with existing methods. The results obtained show patterns of response to treatment that might lead to reconsideration of some of the current clinical hypotheses.

Article information

Abstr. Appl. Anal., Volume 2015, Special Issue (2015), Article ID 823562, 14 pages.

First available in Project Euclid: 17 August 2015

Permanent link to this document

Digital Object Identifier

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)

Zentralblatt MATH identifier


García-Rudolph, Alejandro; Gibert, Karina. A Data Mining Approach for Visual and Analytical Identification of Neurorehabilitation Ranges in Traumatic Brain Injury Cognitive Rehabilitation. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2015, Special Issue (2015), Article ID 823562, 14 pages. doi:10.1155/2015/823562. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aaa/1439816313

Export citation


  • B. Roozenbeek, A. I. R. Maas, and D. K. Menon, “Changing patterns in the epidemiology of traumatic brain injury,” Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 231–236, 2013.
  • J. A. Langlois and R. W. Sattin, “Traumatic brain injury in the United States: research and programs of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),” Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 187–188, 2005.
  • S. A. Tabish and N. Syed, “Traumatic brain injury: the neglected epidemic of modern society,” International Journal of Science and Research, vol. 3, no. 12, 2014.
  • D. T. Stuss, G. Winocur, and I. H. Robertson, Cognitive Neuro-Rehabilitation: Evidence and Application, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2nd edition, 2008.
  • B. A. Wilson, “La réadaption cognitive chez les cérébro-lésés,” in Neuropsychologie Clinique et Neurologie du Comportement, M. I. Botez, Ed., pp. 637–652, Les Presses de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, Canada, 2nd edition, 1996.
  • M. M. Sohlberg, Cognitive Rehabilitation. An interactive Neuropsychological ApproachčommentComment on ref. [6: We deleted reference [33] in the original manuscript, which was a repetition of ? Consequently we will replace all the citations of [33] within text with those of [6?]. Please check all highlighted cases throughout.}, 2001, edited by: C. A. Mateer.
  • R. J. Nudo, “Adaptive plasticity in motor cortex: implications for rehabilitation after brain injury,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, no. 41, supplement, pp. 7–10, 2003.
  • J. R. Carey, W. K. Durfee, E. Bhatt et al., “Comparison of finger tracking versus simple movement training via telerehabilitation to alter hand function and cortical reorganization after stroke,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 216–232, 2007.
  • S. L. Wolf, C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller et al., “Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 296, no. 17, pp. 2095–2104, 2006.
  • C. K. English, S. L. Hillier, K. R. Stiller, and A. Warden-Flood, “Circuit class therapy versus individual physiotherapy sessions during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a controlled trial,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 955–963, 2007.
  • S. Kuys, S. Brauer, and L. Ada, “Routine physiotherapy does not induce a cardiorespiratory training effect post-stroke, regardless of walking ability,” Physiotherapy Research International, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 219–227, 2006.
  • A. García-Rudolph and K. Gibert, “A data mining approach to identify cognitive NeuroRehabilitation Range in Traumatic Brain Injury patients,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 5238–5251, 2014.
  • A. Naamad, D. T. Lee, and W.-L. Hsu, “On the maximum empty rectangle problem,” Discrete Applied Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 267–277, 1984.
  • A. I. Rughani, T. S. M. Dumont, Z. Lu et al., “Use of an artificial neural network to predict head injury outcome,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 585–590, 2010.
  • S.-Y. Ji, R. Smith, T. Huynh, and K. Najarian, “A comparative analysis of multi-level computer-assisted decision making systems for traumatic injuries,” BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 9, no. 1, article 2, 2009.
  • B. C. Pang, V. Kuralmani, R. Joshi et al., “Hybrid outcome prediction model for severe traumatic brain injury,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 136–146, 2007.
  • M. L. Rohling, M. E. Faust, B. Beverly, and G. Demakis, “Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: a meta-analytic re-examination of cicerone et al.'s (2000, 2005) systematic reviews,” Neuropsychology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 20–39, 2009.
  • J. Whyte and T. Hart, “It's more than a black box; it's a Russian doll: defining rehabilitation treatments,” American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, vol. 82, no. 8, pp. 639–652, 2003.
  • K. D. Cicerone, D. M. Langenbahn, C. Braden et al., “Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 519–530, 2011.
  • K. Gibert and A. García-Rudolph, “Desarrollo de herramientas para evaluar el resultado de las tecnologías aplicadas al proceso rehabilitador Estudio a partir de dos modelos concretos: Lesión Medular y Daño Cerebral Adquirido,” in Posibilidades de Aplicación de Minería de Datos para el Descubrimiento de Conocimiento a Partir de la Práctica Clínica, Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologias Sanitarias, AATRM núm. 2006/11, Cap 6, Plan Nacional para el Sistema Nacional de Salud del Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Madrid, Spain; Agència d'Avaluació de Tecnologia I Recerca Mèdiques, Barcelona, Spain, 2007.
  • J. Serra, J. L. Arcos, A. Garcia-Rudolph, A. García-Molina, T. Roig, and J. M. Tormos, “Cognitive prognosis of acquired brain injury patients using machine learning techniques,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Cognitive Technologies and Applications (COGNITIVE '13), pp. 108–113, IARIA, Valencia, Spain, 2013.
  • A. Marcano-Cedeño, P. Chausa, A. García, C. Cáceres, J. M. Tormos, and E. J. Gómez, “Data mining applied to the cognitive rehabilitation of patients with acquired brain injury,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1054–1060, 2013.
  • V. Jagaroo, Neuroinformatics for Neuropsychologists, Springer, 1st edition, 2009.
  • A. Dumitrescu and M. Jiang, “On the largest empty axis-parallel box amidst $n$ points,” Algorithmica, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 225–248, 2013.
  • B. Chazelle, R. L. Drysdale, and D. T. Lee, “Computing the largest empty rectangle,” SIAM Journal on Computing, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 300–315, 1986.
  • A. Aggarwal and S. Suri, “Fast algorithms for computing the largest empty rectangle,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry, pp. 278–290, Waterloo, Canada, June 1987.
  • M. McKenna, J. O'Rourke, and S. Suri, “Finding the largest rectangle in an orthogonal polygon,” in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control and Computing, pp. 486–495, Urbana Champaign, Ill, USA, October 1985.
  • H. S. Baird, S. E. Jones, and S. J. Fortune, “Image segmentation by shape-directed covers,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 820–825, June 1990.
  • J. Edmonds, J. Gryz, D. Liang, and R. J. Miller, “Mining for empty spaces in large data sets,” Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 296, no. 3, pp. 435–452, 2003.
  • J. Augustine, S. Das, A. Maheshwari, S. C. Nandy, S. Roy, and S. Sarvattomananda, “Recognizing the largest empty circle and axis-parallel rectangle in a desired locationčommentComment on ref. [31?]: Please update the information of this reference, if possible.,” CoRR, abs/1004.0558v2, 2010.
  • J. M. Tormos, A. Garcia-Molina, A. Garcia Rudolph, and T. Roig, “Information and communications technology in learning development and rehabilitation,” International Journal of Integrated Care, vol. 9, 2009.
  • C. S. Green and D. Bavelier, “Action-video-game experience alters the spatial resolution of vision,” Psychological Science, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 88–94, 2007.
  • M. D. Lezak, Neuropsychological Assessment, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 1995.
  • L. J. Trettin, Executive functions following traumatic brain injury: the impact of depression upon performance [Ph.D. thesis], Pacific Graduate School of Psychology, 2007. \endinput