Abstract and Applied Analysis

On Data Space Selection and Data Processing for Parameter Identification in a Reaction-Diffusion Model Based on FRAP Experiments

Stefan Kindermann and Štěpán Papáček

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text


Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a widely used measurement technique to determine the mobility of fluorescent molecules within living cells. While the experimental setup and protocol for FRAP experiments are usually fixed, data (pre)processing represents an important issue. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, we formulate and solve the problem of relevant FRAP data selection. The theoretical findings are illustrated by the comparison of the results of parameter identification when the full data set was used and the case when the irrelevant data set (data with negligible impact on the confidence interval of the estimated parameters) was removed from the data space. Second, we analyze and compare two approaches of FRAP data processing. Our proposition, surprisingly for the FRAP community, claims that the data set represented by the FRAP recovery curves in form of a time series (integrated data approach commonly used by the FRAP community) leads to a larger confidence interval compared to the full (spatiotemporal) data approach.

Article information

Abstr. Appl. Anal., Volume 2015, Special Issue (2015), Article ID 859849, 17 pages.

First available in Project Euclid: 17 August 2015

Permanent link to this document

Digital Object Identifier

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)

Zentralblatt MATH identifier


Kindermann, Stefan; Papáček, Štěpán. On Data Space Selection and Data Processing for Parameter Identification in a Reaction-Diffusion Model Based on FRAP Experiments. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2015, Special Issue (2015), Article ID 859849, 17 pages. doi:10.1155/2015/859849. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aaa/1439816310

Export citation


  • F. Mueller, D. Mazza, T. J. Stasevich, and J. G. McNally, “FRAP and kinetic modeling in the analysis of nuclear protein dynamics: what do we really know?” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 403–411, 2010.
  • R. Kaňa, O. Prášil, and C. W. Mullineaux, “Immobility of phycobilins in the thylakoid lumen of a cryptophyte suggests that protein diffusion in the lumen is very restricted,” FEBS Letters, vol. 583, no. 4, pp. 670–674, 2009.
  • R. Kaňa, E. Kotabová, M. Lukeš, and et al, “Phycobilisome mobility and its role in the regulation of light harvesting in red algae,” Plant Physiology, vol. 165, no. 4, pp. 1618–1631, 2014.
  • D. Axelrod, D. E. Koppel, J. Schlessinger, E. Elson, and W. W. Webb, “Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1055–1069, 1976.
  • J. Ellenberg, E. D. Siggia, J. E. Moreira et al., “Nuclear membrane dynamics and reassembly in living cells: targeting of an inner nuclear membrane protein in interphase and mitosis,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 138, no. 6, pp. 1193–1206, 1997.
  • P. Jönsson, M. P. Jonsson, J. O. Tegenfeldt, and F. Höök, “A method improving the accuracy of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching analysis,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 95, no. 11, pp. 5334–5348, 2008.
  • C. W. Mullineaux, M. J. Tobin, and G. R. Jones, “Mobility of photosynthetic complexes in thylakoid membranes,” Nature, vol. 390, no. 6658, pp. 421–424, 1997.
  • S. Seiffert and W. Oppermann, “Systematic evaluation of FRAP experiments performed in a confocal laser scanning microscope,” Journal of Microscopy, vol. 220, no. 1, pp. 20–30, 2005.
  • T.-T. Tsay and K. A. Jacobson, “Spatial fourier analysis of video photobleaching measurements: principles and optimization,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 360–368, 1991.
  • O. N. Irrechukwu and M. E. Levenston, “Improved estimation of solute diffusivity through numerical analysis of FRAP experiments,” Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 104–117, 2009.
  • J. Mai, S. Trump, R. Ali et al., “Are assumptions about the model type necessary in reaction-diffusion modeling? A FRAP application,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 1178–1188, 2011.
  • I. F. Sbalzarini, Analysis, Modeling and Simulation of Diffusion Processes in Cell Biology, VDM Dr. Muller, 2009.
  • H. Engl, M. Hanke, and A. Neubauer, Regularization of Ill-Posed Problems, Kluwer, Dortrecht, The Netherlands, 1996.
  • R. Kaňa, C. Matonoha, Š. Papáček, and J. Soukup, “On estimation of diffusion coefficient based on spatio-temporal FRAP images: an inverse ill-posed problem,” in Programs and Algorithms of Numerical Mathematics 16, J. Chleboun, K. Segeth, J. Šístek, and T. Vejchodský, Eds., pp. 100–111, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 2013.
  • Š. Papáček, R. Kaňa, and C. Matonoha, “Estimation of diffusivity of phycobilisomes on thylakoid membrane based on spatio-temporal FRAP images,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 57, no. 7-8, pp. 1907–1912, 2013.
  • K. S. Zadeh, H. J. Montas, and A. Shirmohammadi, “Identification of biomolecule mass transport and binding rate parameters in living cells by inverse modeling,” Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, vol. 3, article 36, 2006.
  • L. Lukšan, M. Tuma, C. Matonoha et al., “UFO 2014–-interactive system for universal functional optimization,” Tech. Rep. V-1191, Institute of Computer Science, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic, 2014, http://www.cs.cas.cz/luksan/ufo.html.
  • R. Kaňa, “Mobility of photosynthetic proteins,” Photosynthesis Research, vol. 116, no. 2-3, pp. 465–479, 2013.
  • A. Cintrón-Arias, H. T. Banks, A. Capaldi, and A. L. Lloyd, “A sensitivity matrix based methodology for inverse problem formulation,” Journal of Inverse and Ill-posed Problems, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 545–564, 2009.
  • K. Sadegh Zadeh and H. J. Montas, “A class of exact solutions for biomacromolecular diffusion-reaction in live cells,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 264, no. 3, pp. 914–933, 2010.
  • K. Sadegh Zadeh, “A synergic simulation-optimization approach for analyzing biomolecular dynamics in living organisms,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 24–36, 2011.
  • D. M. Bates and D. G. Watts, Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1988.
  • Š. Papáček, J. Jablonský, C. Matonoha, R. Kaňa, and S. Kindermann, “FRAP & FLIP: two sides of the same coin?” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (IWBBIO '15), Granada, Spain, April 2015, F. Ortuño and I. Rojas, Eds., vol. 9044, pp. 444–455, Springer, 2015.
  • Š. Papáček, J. Jablonský, R. Kaňa, C. Matonoha, and S. Kindermann, “From data processing to experimental design and back again: a parameter identification problem based on FRAP images,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Digital Image Processing (ICDIP '15), Dubai, UAE, January 2015. \endinput