Translator Disclaimer
Open Access
VOL. 9 | 2013 The average likelihood ratio for large-scale multiple testing and detecting sparse mixtures
Guenther Walther

Editor(s) M. Banerjee, F. Bunea, J. Huang, V. Koltchinskii, M. H. Maathuis

Abstract

Large-scale multiple testing problems require the simultaneous assessment of many p-values. This paper compares several methods to assess the evidence in multiple binomial counts of p-values: the maximum of the binomial counts after standardization (the “higher-criticism statistic”), the maximum of the binomial counts after a log-likelihood ratio transformation (the “Berk–Jones statistic”), and a newly introduced average of the binomial counts after a likelihood ratio transformation. Simulations show that the higher criticism statistic has a superior performance to the Berk–Jones statistic in the case of very sparse alternatives (sparsity coefficient $\beta \gtrapprox 0.75$), while the situation is reversed for $\beta \lessapprox 0.75$. The average likelihood ratio is found to combine the favorable performance of higher criticism in the very sparse case with that of the Berk–Jones statistic in the less sparse case and thus appears to dominate both statistics. Some asymptotic optimality theory is considered but found to set in too slowly to illuminate the above findings, at least for sample sizes up to one million. In contrast, asymptotic approximations to the critical values of the Berk–Jones statistic that have been developed by [In High Dimensional Probability III (2003) 321–332 Birkhäuser] and [ Ann. Statist. 35 (2007) 2018–2053] are found to give surprisingly accurate approximations even for quite small sample sizes.

Information

Published: 1 January 2013
First available in Project Euclid: 8 March 2013

zbMATH: 1356.62095
MathSciNet: MR3202643

Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/12-IMSCOLL923

Subjects:
Primary: 60G30 , 60G30
Secondary: 60G32

Keywords: Average likelihood ratio , Berk–Jones statistic , higher criticism , log-likelihood ratio transformation , sparse mixture

Rights: Copyright © 2010, Institute of Mathematical Statistics

CHAPTER
10 PAGES


SHARE
Back to Top