Translator Disclaimer
VOL. 2009 | 2010 Survey on the Fundamental Lemma
Ngô Bao Châu

Editor(s) David Jerison, Barry Mazur, Tomasz Mrowka, Wilfried Schmid, Richard P. Stanley, Shing-Tung Yau


This is a survey on the recent proof of the fundamental lemma. The fundamental lemma and the related transfer conjecture were formulated by R. Langlands in the context of endoscopy theory for automorphic representations in [26]. Important arithmetic applications follow from the endoscopy theory, including the transfer of automorphic representations from classical groups to linear groups and the construction of Galois representations attached to automorphic forms via Shimura varieties. Independent of applications, endoscopy theory is instrumental in building a stable trace formula that seems necessary to any decisive progress toward Langlands’ conjecture on functoriality of automorphic representations.

There are already several expository texts on endoscopy theory and in particular on the fundamental lemma. The original text [26] and articles of Kottwitz [19], [20] are always the best places to learn the theory. The two introductory articles to endoscopy, one by Labesse [24], the other [14] written by Harris for the Book project are highly recommended. So are the reports on the proof of the fundamental lemma in the unitary case written by Dat for Bourbaki [7] and in general written by Dat and Ngô Dac for the Book project [8]. I have also written three expository notes on Hitchin fibration and the fundamental lemma : ["Fibration de Hitchin et structure endoscopique de la formule des traces," International Congress of Mathematicians. Vol. II, 1213–1225, Eur. Math. Soc., Zurich, 2006] reports on endoscopic structure of the cohomology of the Hitchin fibration, [Vietnamese congress of mathematicians (2008)] is a more gentle introduction to the fundamental lemma, and ["Decomposition theorem and abelian fibration"] reports on the support theorem, a key point in the proof of the fundamental lemma written for the Book project. The survey follows the same plan as [Vietnamese congress of mathematicians (2008)] but more details have been added.

This report is written when its author enjoyed the hospitality of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton. He acknowledges the support of the Simonyi foundation and the Monell Foundation during his stay in the Institute.


Published: 1 November 2010
First available in Project Euclid: 23 April 2012

zbMATH: 1238.11059
MathSciNet: MR2757357

Rights: Copyright © 2010 International Press of Boston


Back to Top