Open Access
December 2018 Support points
Simon Mak, V. Roshan Joseph
Ann. Statist. 46(6A): 2562-2592 (December 2018). DOI: 10.1214/17-AOS1629

Abstract

This paper introduces a new way to compact a continuous probability distribution $F$ into a set of representative points called support points. These points are obtained by minimizing the energy distance, a statistical potential measure initially proposed by Székely and Rizzo [InterStat 5 (2004) 1–6] for testing goodness-of-fit. The energy distance has two appealing features. First, its distance-based structure allows us to exploit the duality between powers of the Euclidean distance and its Fourier transform for theoretical analysis. Using this duality, we show that support points converge in distribution to $F$, and enjoy an improved error rate to Monte Carlo for integrating a large class of functions. Second, the minimization of the energy distance can be formulated as a difference-of-convex program, which we manipulate using two algorithms to efficiently generate representative point sets. In simulation studies, support points provide improved integration performance to both Monte Carlo and a specific quasi-Monte Carlo method. Two important applications of support points are then highlighted: (a) as a way to quantify the propagation of uncertainty in expensive simulations and (b) as a method to optimally compact Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samples in Bayesian computation.

Citation

Download Citation

Simon Mak. V. Roshan Joseph. "Support points." Ann. Statist. 46 (6A) 2562 - 2592, December 2018. https://doi.org/10.1214/17-AOS1629

Information

Received: 1 August 2016; Revised: 1 August 2017; Published: December 2018
First available in Project Euclid: 7 September 2018

zbMATH: 06968592
MathSciNet: MR3851748
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/17-AOS1629

Subjects:
Primary: 62E17

Keywords: Bayesian computation , energy distance , Monte Carlo , numerical integration , quasi-Monte Carlo , representative points

Rights: Copyright © 2018 Institute of Mathematical Statistics

Vol.46 • No. 6A • December 2018
Back to Top