A $\Pi^0_1$ class can be defined as the set of infinite paths through a
computable tree. For classes $P$ and $Q$, say that $P$ is Medvedev reducible to $Q$, $P \leq_M Q$, if there is a computably continuous functional mapping $Q$ into $P$. Let $\mathcal{L}_M$ be the lattice of degrees formed by $\Pi^0_1$ subclasses of $2^\omega$ under the Medvedev reducibility. In "Non-branching degrees in
the Medvedev lattice of $\Pi \sp{0}\sb{1} classes," I provided a characterization of
nonbranching/branching and a classification of the nonbranching
degrees. In this paper, I present a similar classification of the
branching degrees. In particular, $P$ is separable if there is a clopen set $C$ such that $P \cap C \neq \emptyset \neq P \cap C^c$ and $P \cap C \perp_M P \cap C^c$. By the results in the first paper, separability is an
invariant of a Medvedev degree and a degree is branching if and only
if it contains a separable member. Further define $P$ to be hyperseparable if, for all such $C$, $P \cap C \perp_M P \cap C^c$ and totally separable if, for all $X,Y \in P$, $X \perp_T Y$. I will show that totally separable implies hyperseparable
implies separable and that the reverse implications do not hold, that
is, that these are three distinct types of branching degrees. Along
the way I will show some related results and present a combinatorial
framework for constructing $\Pi^0_1$ classes with priority arguments.
Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)
We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription.
Read more about accessing full-text
Alternatively, the document is available for a cost of $20. Select the "buy article" button below to purchase this document from a secured VeriSign, Inc. site.
References
[1] Alfeld, C. P., "Non-branching degrees in the Medvedev lattice of $\Pi \sp0\sb1$" classes, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 72 (2007), pp. 81--97.
[2] Binns, S., "A splitting theorem for the Medvedev and Muchnik lattices", Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 49 (2003), pp. 327--35.
[3] Cenzer, D., and P. G. Hinman, "Density of the Medvedev lattice of $\Pi\sp 0\sb 1$" classes, Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 42 (2003), pp. 583--600.
[4] Cenzer, D., and C. G. Jockusch, Jr., "$\Pi\sb 1\sp 0$" classes---Structure and applications", pp. 39--59 in Computability Theory and Its Applications (Boulder, CO, 1999), vol. 257 of Contempory Mathematics, American Mathematics Society, Providence, 2000.
[5] Cenzer, D., and J. B. Remmel, "$\Pi\sp 0\sb 1$" classes in mathematics", pp. 623--821 in Handbook of Recursive Mathematics, Vol. 2, vol. 139 of Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1998.
[6] Jockusch, C. G., Jr., and R. I. Soare, "$\Pi \sp0\sb1$" classes and degrees of theories", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 173 (1972), pp. 33--56.
[7] Rogers, H., Jr., Theory of recursive functions and effective computability, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1987.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR886890
[8] Simpson, S. G., "Mass problems and randomness", The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 11 (2005), pp. 1--27.
[9] Simpson, S. G., "$\Pi\sp 0\sb 1$" sets and models of $\textWKL_0$", pp. 352--78 in Reverse Mathematics 2001, edited by S. G. Simpson, vol. 21 of Lecture Notes in Logic, A. K. Peters, Ltd., Wellesley, 2005.
[10] Simpson, S. G., "An extension of the recursively enumerable Turing degrees", Journal of London Mathematical Society, Second Series, vol. 75 (2007), pp. 287--97.
[11] Soare, R. I., Recursively Enumerable Sets and Degrees, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR882921