Computable exponential bounds for screened estimation and simulation
Ioannis Kontoyiannis and Sean P. Meyn
Source: Ann. Appl. Probab.
Volume 18, Number 4
(2008), 1491-1518.
Abstract
Suppose the expectation E(F(X)) is to be estimated by the empirical averages of the values of F on independent and identically distributed samples {Xi}. A sampling rule called the “screened” estimator is introduced, and its performance is studied. When the mean E(U(X)) of a different function U is known, the estimates are “screened,” in that we only consider those which correspond to times when the empirical average of the {U(Xi)} is sufficiently close to its known mean. As long as U dominates F appropriately, the screened estimates admit exponential error bounds, even when F(X) is heavy-tailed. The main results are several nonasymptotic, explicit exponential bounds for the screened estimates. A geometric interpretation, in the spirit of Sanov’s theorem, is given for the fact that the screened estimates always admit exponential error bounds, even if the standard estimates do not. And when they do, the screened estimates’ error probability has a significantly better exponent. This implies that screening can be interpreted as a variance reduction technique. Our main mathematical tools come from large deviations techniques. The results are illustrated by a detailed simulation example.
Primary Subjects: 60C05, 60F10
Secondary Subjects: 60G05, 60E15
Keywords: Estimation; Monte Carlo; simulation; large deviations; computable bounds; measure concentration; variance reduction
Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)
We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription.
Read more about accessing full-text
Alternatively, the document is available for a cost of $15. Select the "buy article" button below to purchase this document from a secured VeriSign, Inc. site.
Links and Identifiers
Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoap/1216677129
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/00-AAP492
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet):
MR2434178
References
[1] Brooks, S. and Gelman, A. (1998). Some issues in monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. In Proceedings of the Section on Statistical Computing. American Statistical Association, Washington, DC.
[2] Csiszár, I. (1967). Information-type measures of difference of probability distributions and indirect observations. Studia Sci. Math. Hungar. 2 299–318.
[3] Csiszár, I. (1984). Sanov property, generalized I-projection and a conditional limit theorem. Ann. Probab. 12 768–793.
[4] Dembo, A. and Zeitouni, O. (1998). Large Deviations Techniques and Applications, Springer, New York.
[5] Durrett, R. (1996). Probability: Theory and Examples, 2nd ed. Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA.
[6] Fishman, G. S. (1996). Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms and Applications. Springer, New York.
[7] Givens, G. H. and Hoeting, J. A. (2005). Computational Statistics, 2nd ed. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
[8] Glasserman, P. (2004). Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering. Springer, New York.
[9] Glynn, P. W. and Szechtman, R. (2002). Some new perspectives on the method of control variates. In Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 2000 (Hong Kong) 27–49. Springer, Berlin.
[10] Kontoyiannis, I. and Kyriazopoulou-Panagiotopoulou, S. (2007). Control variates as screening functions. Preprint.
[11] Liu, J. S. (2001). Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing. Springer, New York.
[12] Mikosch, T. and Nagaev, A. V. (1998). Large deviations of heavy-tailed sums with applications in insurance. Extremes 1 81–110.
[13] Robert, C. P. and Casella, G. (2004). Monte Carlo Statistical Methods, 2nd ed. Springer, New York.
[14] Sanov, I. N. (1957). On the probability of large deviations of random variables. Mat. Sb. 42 11–44. [English translation in Sel. Transl. Math. Statist. Probab. 1 213–244. (1961)]
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR116378