Statistical Science

Citation Statistics

Robert Adler, John Ewing, and Peter Taylor

Full-text: Open access

Article information

Source
Statist. Sci. Volume 24, Number 1 (2009), 1-14.

Dates
First available: 8 October 2009

Permanent link to this document
http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ss/1255009002

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1214/09-STS285

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR2561120

Citation

Adler, Robert; Ewing, John; Taylor, Peter. Citation Statistics. Statistical Science 24 (2009), no. 1, 1--14. doi:10.1214/09-STS285. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ss/1255009002.


Export citation

References

  • Adler, R. (2007). The impact of impact factors. IMS Bulletin 36 4.
  • Amin, M. and Mabe, M. (2000). Impact factor: Use and abuse. Perspectives in Publishing 1 1–6.
  • Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G., Kinouchi, O. and Martinez, A. S. (2005). Universal behavior of a research productivity index. Available at: arXiv:physics/0510142.
  • Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G. and Kinouchi, O. (2006). Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics 68 179–189.
  • Bergstrom, C. (2007). Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and presitige of scholarly journals. College & Research Libraries News 68 5.
  • Best, J. (2001). Damned Lies and Statistics: Untangling the Numbers From the Media, Politicians, and Activists. Univ. California Press, Berkeley.
  • Bird, S. et al. (2005). Performance indicators: Good, bad, and ugly; Report of a working party on performance monitoring in the public services. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A 168 1–27.
  • Brooks, T. (1986). Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 37 34–36.
  • Carey, A. L., Cowling, M. G. and Taylor, P. G. (2007). Assessing research in the mathematical sciences. Gazette of the Australian Math Society 34 84–89.
  • Cozzens, S. E. (1989). What do citations count? The rhetoric-first model. Scientometrics 15 437–447.
  • Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics 69 131–152.
  • Evidence Report (2007). The use of bibliometrics to measure research quality in the UK higher education system. (A report produced for the Research Policy Committee of Universities, UK, by Evidence Ltd., a company specializing in research performance analysis and interpretation. Evidence Ltd. has “strategic alliance” with Thomson Scientific.) Available at http:// bookshop.universitiesuk.ac.uk/downloads/bibliometrics.pdf.
  • Ewing, J. (2006). Measuring journals. Notices of the AMS 53 1049–1053.
  • Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 122 108–111.
  • Garfield, E. (1987). Why are the impacts of the leading medical journals so similar and yet so different? Current Comments 2 3.
  • Garfield, E. (1998). Long-term vs. short-term journal impact (part II). The Scientist 12 12–13.
  • Garfield, E. (2005). Agony and the ecstasy—the history and meaning of the journal impact factor. In International Congress on Peer Review and Bibliomedical Publication. Chicago.
  • Goldstein, H. and Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1996). League tables and their limitations: Statistical issues in comparisons of institutional performance. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A 159 385–443.
  • Hall, P. (2007). Measuring research performance in the mathematical sciences in Australian universities. Austral. Math. Soc. Gaz. 34 26–30.
  • Hirsch, J. E. (2006). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 16569–16573.
  • Kinney, A. L. (2007). National scientific facilities and their science impact on nonbiomedical research. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 17943–17947.
  • Lehmann, S., Jackson, A. D. and Lautrup, B. E. (2006). Measures for measures. Nature 444 1003–1004.
  • Macdonald, S. and Kam, J. (2007). Aardvark et al.: Quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies. J. Inform. Sci. 33 702–717.
  • Martin, B. R. (1996). The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research. Scientometrics 36 343–362.
  • Martin, B. R. and Irvine, J. (1983). Assessing basic research. Research Policy 12 61–90.
  • Meho, L. and Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science vs. Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 2105–2125.
  • Molinari, J. F. and Molinari, A. (2008). A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions. Scientometrics. To appear. Available at http://imechanica.org/files/paper.pdf.
  • Monastersky, R. (2005). The number that’s devouring science. Chronicle Higher Ed. 52 8.
  • Rossner, M., Van Epps, H. and Hill, E. (2007). Show me the data. Journal of Cell Biology 179 1091–1092.
  • Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor for journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 314 497.
  • Sidiropoulos, A., Katsaros, D. and Manolopoulos, Y. (2006). Generalized h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks. Available at arXiv:cs/0607066.
  • Stringer, M. J., Sales-Pardo, M. and Nunes Amaral, L. A. (2008). Effectiveness of journal ranking schemes as a tool for locating information. PLoS ONE 3 e1683.
  • THOMSON: JOURNAL CITATION REPORTS. (2007). Thomson Scientific website is http://scientific.thomson.com/products/jcr/.
  • THOMSON: SELECTION. (2007). Thomson Scientific website is http://isiwebofknowledge.com/benefits/essays/journalselection/.
  • THOMSON: IMPACT FACTOR. Thomson Scientific website is http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/free/essays/impact_factor.
  • THOMSON: HISTORY. Thomson Scientific website is http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/free/essays/history_of_citation_indexing/.
  • THOMSON: FIFTY YEARS. Thomson Scientific website is http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/free/essays/50_years_citation_indexing/.