Statistical Science

That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects

G. K. Robinson

Full-text: Open access

Abstract

In animal breeding, Best Linear Unbiased Prediction, or BLUP, is a technique for estimating genetic merits. In general, it is a method of estimating random effects. It can be used to derive the Kalman filter, the method of Kriging used for ore reserve estimation, credibility theory used to work out insurance premiums, and Hoadley's quality measurement plan used to estimate a quality index. It can be used for removing noise from images and for small-area estimation. This paper presents the theory of BLUP, some examples of its application and its relevance to the foundations of statistics. Understanding of procedures for estimating random effects should help people to understand some complicated and controversial issues about fixed and random effects models and also help to bridge the apparent gulf between the Bayesian and Classical schools of thought.

Article information

Source
Statist. Sci. Volume 6, Number 1 (1991), 15-32.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 19 April 2007

Permanent link to this document
http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ss/1177011926

JSTOR
links.jstor.org

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1214/ss/1177011926

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR1108815

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
0955.62500

Citation

Robinson, G. K. That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects. Statistical Science 6 (1991), no. 1, 15--32. doi:10.1214/ss/1177011926. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ss/1177011926.


Export citation

See also

  • See Comment: Katherine Campbell. [That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects]: Comment. Statist. Sci., Volume 6, Number 1 (1991), 32--34.
  • See Comment: David A. Harville. [That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects]: Comment. Statist. Sci., Volume 6, Number 1 (1991), 35--39.
  • See Comment: James C. Spall. [That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects]: Comment: The Kalman Filter and BLUP. Statist. Sci., Volume 6, Number 1 (1991), 39--41.
  • See Comment: Terry Speed. [That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects]: Comment. Statist. Sci., Volume 6, Number 1 (1991), 42--44.
  • See Comment: Duane Steffey, Robert E. Kass. [That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects]: Comment. Statist. Sci., Volume 6, Number 1 (1991), 45--47.
  • See Comment: Robin Thompson. [That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects]: Comment. Statist. Sci., Volume 6, Number 1 (1991), 47--47.
  • See Comment: G. K. Robinson. [That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects]: Rejoinder. Statist. Sci., Volume 6, Number 1 (1991), 48--51.