Open Access
2014 Two counterexamples in abstract factorization
Jason Juett
Rocky Mountain J. Math. 44(1): 139-155 (2014). DOI: 10.1216/RMJ-2014-44-1-139

Abstract

We give examples that provide negative answers to three questions about abstract factorization posed by Anderson and Frazier. We show that (1)~an atomic domain need not be $\tau$-atomic for $\tau$ divisive, (2)~an atomic domain need not be a comaximal factorization domain (CFD) and (3)~for $\tau$ divisive, a nonzero nonunit of a $\tau$-UFD need not be a $\tau$-product of $\tau$-primes. Along the way, we generalize the theorem of Anderson and Frazier that a UFD is a $\tau$-UFD for $\tau$ divisive (with a simplified proof), and we demonstrate a method for constructing domains with no pseudo-irreducible elements.

Citation

Download Citation

Jason Juett. "Two counterexamples in abstract factorization." Rocky Mountain J. Math. 44 (1) 139 - 155, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1216/RMJ-2014-44-1-139

Information

Published: 2014
First available in Project Euclid: 2 June 2014

zbMATH: 1296.13003
MathSciNet: MR3216013
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1216/RMJ-2014-44-1-139

Subjects:
Primary: 13A05 , 13F15

Keywords: aFctorization , comaximal factorization , τ -factorization

Rights: Copyright © 2014 Rocky Mountain Mathematics Consortium

Vol.44 • No. 1 • 2014
Back to Top