Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

Comment on J. A. Fodor's ``Cognitive science and the twin-Earth problem''.

Hilary Putnam

Full-text: Open access

Article information

Source
Notre Dame J. Formal Logic Volume 23, Number 3 (1982), 294-295.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 30 August 2004

Permanent link to this document
http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ndjfl/1093870088

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR658799

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1093870088

Subjects
Primary: 03B65: Logic of natural languages [See also 68T50, 91F20]
Secondary: 03A05: Philosophical and critical {For philosophy of mathematics, see also 00A30} 03B45: Modal logic (including the logic of norms) {For knowledge and belief, see 03B42; for temporal logic, see 03B44; for provability logic, see also 03F45}

Citation

Putnam, Hilary. Comment on J. A. Fodor's ``Cognitive science and the twin-Earth problem''. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 23 (1982), no. 3, 294--295. doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1093870088. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ndjfl/1093870088.


Export citation

See also

  • Orig : J. A. Fodor. Cognitive science and the twin-Earth problem. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, volume 23,issue 2, (1982), pg. 98-118.
  • Comments on : Tyler Burge. Two thought experiments reviewed: comments on J. A. Fodor's paper: ``Cognitive science and the twin-Earth problem''. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, volume 23,issue 3, (1982), pg. 284-293.