## Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

#### Abstract

Professor Robert Koons provides a welcome guide to our book The Revision Theory of Truth, and he puts forward objections that deserve serious consideration. In this note we shall respond to his principal objection. This objection calls into question our main thesis. As we argue, however, the objection is not successful. We should forewarn the reader that this note is not self-contained. It presupposes familiarity with The Revision Theory of Truth (primarily, Chapter 4) and with the review.

#### Article information

Source
Notre Dame J. Formal Logic Volume 35, Number 4 (1994), 632-636.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 20 December 2002

http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ndjfl/1040408617

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1040408617

#### Citation

Gupta, Anil; Belnap, Nuel. Reply to Robert Koons. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 35 (1994), no. 4, 632--636. doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1040408617. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ndjfl/1040408617.

#### References

• [1] Gupta, A., A critique of deflationism," Philosophical Topics, vol. 21 (1993), pp. 57--81.
• [2] Gupta, A., and N. Belnap, The Revision Theory of Truth, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1993.
• [3] Koons, R., Book Review, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 35 (1994), pp. 606--631.