Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

On the Insufficiency of Linear Diagrams for Syllogisms

Oliver Lemon and Ian Pratt

Abstract

In Volume 33:1 of the Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, a system for diagramming syllogistic inferences using straight line segments is presented by Englebretsen. In light of recent research on the representational power of diagrammatic representation systems by the authors, we point out some problems with the proposal, and indeed, with any proposal for representing logically possible situations diagrammatically. We shall first outline the proposed linear diagrammatic system of Englebretsen, and then show by means of counterexamples that it is inadequate as a representation scheme for general logical inferences (the task for which the system is intended). We also show that modifications to the system fail to remedy the problems. The considerations we present are not limited to the particular proposal of Englebretsen; we thus draw a more general moral about the use of spatial relations in representation systems.

Article information

Source
Notre Dame J. Formal Logic Volume 39, Number 4 (1998), 573-580.

Dates
First available: 5 December 2002

Permanent link to this document
http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ndjfl/1039118871

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR1776228

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1039118871

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
1002.03517

Subjects
Primary: 03B10: Classical first-order logic
Secondary: 03A05: Philosophical and critical {For philosophy of mathematics, see also 00A30} 03B20: Subsystems of classical logic (including intuitionistic logic)

Citation

Lemon, Oliver; Pratt, Ian. On the Insufficiency of Linear Diagrams for Syllogisms. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 39 (1998), no. 4, 573--580. doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1039118871. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ndjfl/1039118871.


Export citation

References

  • [1] Allwein, G., and J. Barwise, eds., Logical Reasoning with Diagrams, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996.
  • [2] Barwise, J., and A. Shimojima, ``Surrogate reasoning,'' Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of Japanese Cognitive Science Society, vol. 4 (1995), pp. 7--27.
  • [3] Bollobás, B., Graph Theory: An Introductory Course, Springer, New York, 1979.
  • [4] Cummins, R., Representations, Targets, and Attitudes, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1996.
  • [5] Englebretsen, G., ``Linear diagrams for syllogisms (with relationals),'' Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 33 (1992), pp. 37--69.
  • [6] Englebretsen, G., Something to Reckon With, University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa, 1996.
  • [7] Gardner, M., Logic Machines and Diagrams, Harvester Press, Sussex, 1958.
  • [8] Glasgow, J., N. H. Narayanan, and B. Chandrasekaran, eds., Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, AAAI Press/The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1995.
  • [9] Hammer, E. M., ``Reasoning with sentences and diagrams,'' Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 35 (1994) pp. 73--87.
  • [10] Hammer, E. M., Logic and Visual Information, Studies in Logic, Language, and Computation, CSLI Publications and FoLLI, Stanford, 1995.
  • [11] Lemon, O., review of Logic and Visual Information by E. M. Hammer (CSLI Publications), Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, vol. 6 (1997), pp. 213--16.
  • [12] Lemon, O., ``Comparing the efficacy of lenses, lines, and logics,'' Logic, Language, and Diagrams, edited by Barker-Plummer, Beaver, di Luzio, and van Benthem, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 2000 (in press).
  • [13] Lemon, O., M. de Rijke, and A. Shimojima, ``Efficacy of diagrammatic reasoning,'' Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, vol. 8 (1999), pp. 265--71.
  • [14] Lemon, O., and I. Pratt, ``Logical and diagrammatic reasoning: the complexity of conceptual space,'' pp. 430--35 in 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, edited by M. Shafto and P. Langley, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, 1997.
  • [15] Lemon, O., and I. Pratt, ``Spatial logic and the complexity of diagrammatic reasoning,'' Machine Graphics and Vision, Special Issue on Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning, vol. 6 (1997), pp. 89--108.
  • [16] Shimojima, A., ``Reasoning with diagrams and geometrical constraints,'' Logic, Language and Computation, Lecture Notes, CSLI, vol. 1 (1996), pp. 527--40.
  • [17] Shin, S., The Logical Status of Diagrams, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
  • [18] Shin, S., and O. Lemon, ``Diagrams,'' Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, forthcoming.
  • [19] Stenning, K., and O. Lemon, ``Aligning logical and psychological perspectives on diagrammatic reasoning,'' Artificial Intelligence Review, forthcoming.
  • [20] Stenning, K., and J. Oberlander, ``A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: logic and implementation,'' Cognitive Science, vol. 19 (1995), pp. 97--140.
  • [21] Swoyer, C., ``Structural representation and surrogative reasoning,'' Synthese, vol. 87 (1991), pp. 449--508.