Journal of Symbolic Logic

Incompatible Ω-complete theories

Peter Koellner and W. Hugh Woodin

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected) We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text

Abstract

In 1985 the second author showed that if there is a proper class of measurable Woodin cardinals and V𝔹1 and V𝔹2 are generic extensions of V satisfying CH then V𝔹1 and V𝔹2 agree on all Σ21-statements. In terms of the strong logic Ω-logic this can be reformulated by saying that under the above large cardinal assumption ZFC + CH is Ω-complete for Σ21. Moreover, CH is the unique Σ21-statement with this feature in the sense that any other Σ21-statement with this feature is Ω-equivalent to CH over ZFC. It is natural to look for other strengthenings of ZFC that have an even greater degree of Ω-completeness. For example, one can ask for recursively enumerable axioms A such that relative to large cardinal axioms ZFC + A is Ω-complete for all of third-order arithmetic. Going further, for each specifiable segment Vλ of the universe of sets (for example, one might take Vλ to be the least level that satisfies there is a proper class of huge cardinals), one can ask for recursively enumerable axioms A such that relative to large cardinal axioms ZFC + A is Ω-complete for the theory of Vλ. If such theories exist, extend one another, and are unique in the sense that any other such theory B with the same level of Ω-completeness as A is actually Ω-equivalent to A over ZFC, then this would show that there is a unique Ω-complete picture of the successive fragments of the universe of sets and it would make for a very strong case for axioms complementing large cardinal axioms. In this paper we show that uniqueness must fail. In particular, we show that if there is one such theory that Ω-implies CH then there is another that Ω-implies ¬CH.

Article information

Source
J. Symbolic Logic Volume 74, Issue 4 (2009), 1155-1170.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 5 October 2009

Permanent link to this document
http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jsl/1254748685

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.2178/jsl/1254748685

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
05654324

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR2583814

Citation

Koellner, Peter; Woodin, W. Hugh. Incompatible Ω-complete theories. J. Symbolic Logic 74 (2009), no. 4, 1155--1170. doi:10.2178/jsl/1254748685. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jsl/1254748685.


Export citation