Journal of Symbolic Logic

An alternative semantics for quantified relevant logic

Robert Goldblatt and Edwin D. Mares

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected) We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text


The quantified relevant logic RQ is given a new semantics in which a formula ∀ x A is true when there is some true proposition that implies all x-instantiations of A. Formulae are modelled as functions from variable-assignments to propositions, where a proposition is a set of worlds in a relevant model structure. A completeness proof is given for a basic quantificational system QR from which RQ is obtained by adding the axiom EC of ‘extensional confinement’: ∀ x(A∨ B)→(A∨∀ xB), with x not free in A. Validity of EC requires an additional model condition involving the boolean difference of propositions. A QR-model falsifying EC is constructed by forming the disjoint union of two natural arithmetical structures in which negation is interpreted by the minus operation.

Article information

J. Symbolic Logic Volume 71, Issue 1 (2006), 163-187.

First available in Project Euclid: 22 February 2006

Permanent link to this document

Digital Object Identifier

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)

Zentralblatt MATH identifier


Mares, Edwin D.; Goldblatt, Robert. An alternative semantics for quantified relevant logic. J. Symbolic Logic 71 (2006), no. 1, 163--187. doi:10.2178/jsl/1140641167.

Export citation


  • Alan R. Anderson, Nuel D. Belnap, and J. M. Dunn Entailment: The logic of relevance and necessity, vol. II, Princeton University Press, Princeton,1992.
  • David M. Armstrong A world of states of affairs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,1997.
  • Ross Brady (editor) Relevant logics and their rivals, vol. II, Ashgate, Aldershot,2003.
  • C. C. Chang and H. Jerome Kiesler Model theory, second ed., North Holland, Amsterdam,1977.
  • J. Michael Dunn Algebraic completeness results for R-mingle and its extensions, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 35 (1970), pp. 1--13.
  • -------- Star and perp, Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 7 (1993), pp. 331--357.
  • J. Michael Dunn and Greg Restall Relevance logic, Handbook of philosophical logic (G. M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, editors), vol. 6, Kluwer, Dordrecht, second ed.,2002, pp. 1--128.
  • Kit Fine Models for entailment, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 3 (1974), pp. 347--372, Reprinted in Anderson, Belnap, and Dunn (1992) \S 51.
  • -------- Semantics for quantified relevance logic, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 17 (1988), pp. 22--59, Reprinted in Anderson, Belnap, and Dunn (1992) \S 53.
  • -------- Incompleteness for quantified relevance logics, Directions in relevant logic (J. Norman and R. Sylvan, editors), Kluwer, Dordrecht,1989, Reprinted in Anderson, Belnap, and Dunn (1992) \S 52, pp. 205--225.
  • Paul Halmos Algebriac logic, Chelsea, New York,1962.
  • Robert K. Meyer and J. Michael Dunn E, R, and $\gamma$, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 34 (1969), pp. 460--474.
  • Robert K. Meyer, J. Michael Dunn, and Hughes Leblanc Completeness of relevant quantificational theories, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 15 (1974), pp. 97--121.
  • Greg Restall An introduction to substructural logics, Routledge, London,2000.
  • Richard Routley and Robert K. Meyer The semantics of entailment (I), Truth, syntax, and modality (Hughes Leblanc, editor), North Holland, Amsterdam,1973, pp. 199--243.
  • Richard Routley, Robert K. Meyer, Val Plumwood, and Ross T. Brady Relevant logics and their rivals, vol. 1, Ridgeview, Atascardero,1982.
  • Bertrand Russell The philosophy of logical atomism,1918, reprinted in Russell, The Philosophy of Logical Atomism, Open Court, LaSalle, IL, 1985.