December 2003 Cardinal-preserving extensions
Sy D. Friedman
J. Symbolic Logic 68(4): 1163-1170 (December 2003). DOI: 10.2178/jsl/1067620178

Abstract

A classic result of Baumgartner-Harrington-Kleinberg implies that assuming CH a stationary subset of ω1 has a CUB subset in a cardinal-perserving generic extension of V, via a forcing of cardinality ω1. Therefore, assuming that ω2L is countable: { X ∈ L | X⊆ ω1L and X has a CUB subset in a cardinal-preserving extension of L} is constructible, as it equals the set of constructible subsets of ω1L which in L are stationary. Is there a similar such result for subsets of ω2L? Building on work of M. Stanley, we show that there is not. We shall also consider a number of related problems, examining the extent to which they are “solvable” in the above sense, as well as defining a notion of reduction between them.

Citation

Download Citation

Sy D. Friedman. "Cardinal-preserving extensions." J. Symbolic Logic 68 (4) 1163 - 1170, December 2003. https://doi.org/10.2178/jsl/1067620178

Information

Published: December 2003
First available in Project Euclid: 31 October 2003

zbMATH: 1059.03051
MathSciNet: MR2017346
Digital Object Identifier: 10.2178/jsl/1067620178

Subjects:
Primary: 03E35 , 03E45 , 03E55

Keywords: descriptive set theory , innermodels , large cardinals

Rights: Copyright © 2003 Association for Symbolic Logic

JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

Vol.68 • No. 4 • December 2003
Back to Top