Open Access
2014 Mean field variational Bayes for continuous sparse signal shrinkage: Pitfalls and remedies
Sarah E. Neville, John T. Ormerod, M. P. Wand
Electron. J. Statist. 8(1): 1113-1151 (2014). DOI: 10.1214/14-EJS910

Abstract

We investigate mean field variational approximate Bayesian inference for models that use continuous distributions, Horseshoe, Negative-Exponential-Gamma and Generalized Double Pareto, for sparse signal shrinkage. Our principal finding is that the most natural, and simplest, mean field variational Bayes algorithm can perform quite poorly due to posterior dependence among auxiliary variables. More sophisticated algorithms, based on special functions, are shown to be superior. Continued fraction approximations via Lentz’s Algorithm are developed to make the algorithms practical.

Citation

Download Citation

Sarah E. Neville. John T. Ormerod. M. P. Wand. "Mean field variational Bayes for continuous sparse signal shrinkage: Pitfalls and remedies." Electron. J. Statist. 8 (1) 1113 - 1151, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1214/14-EJS910

Information

Published: 2014
First available in Project Euclid: 7 August 2014

zbMATH: 1298.62050
MathSciNet: MR3263115
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/14-EJS910

Subjects:
Primary: 62F15
Secondary: 62J07

Keywords: Approximate Bayesian inference , Continued fraction , Generalized Double Pareto distribution , Horseshoe distribution , Lentz’s Algorithm , Normal-Exponential-Gamma distribution , ‎special‎ ‎function

Rights: Copyright © 2014 The Institute of Mathematical Statistics and the Bernoulli Society

Vol.8 • No. 1 • 2014
Back to Top