Bulletin of Symbolic Logic

Types in Logic and Mathematics before 1940

Fairouz Kamareddine, Twan Laan, and Rob Nederpelt

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected) We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text

Abstract

In this article, we study the prehistory of type theory up to 1910 and its development between Russell and Whitehead's Principia Mathematica ([71], 1910-1912) and Church's simply typed $\lambda$-calculus of 1940. We first argue that the concept of types has always been present in mathematics, though nobody was incorporating them explicitly as such, before the end of the 19th century. Then we proceed by describing how the logical paradoxes entered the formal systems of Frege, Cantor and Peano concentrating on Frege's Grundgesetze der Arithmetik for which Russell applied his famous paradox and this led him to introduce the first theory of types, the Ramified Type Theory (RTT). We present RTT formally using the modern notation for type theory and we discuss how Ramsey, Hilbert and Ackermann removed the orders from RTT leading to the simple theory of types STT. We present STT and Church's own simply typed $\lambda$-calculus ($\lambda \rightarrow C$) and we finish by comparing RTT, STT and $\lambda \rightarrow_C$.

Article information

Source
Bull. Symbolic Logic Volume 8, Number 2 (2002), 185-245.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 20 June 2007

Permanent link to this document
http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bsl/1182353871

JSTOR
links.jstor.org

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.2178/bsl/1182353871

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR1919589

Citation

Kamareddine, Fairouz; Laan, Twan; Nederpelt, Rob. Types in Logic and Mathematics before 1940. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (2002), no. 2, 185--245. doi:10.2178/bsl/1182353871. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bsl/1182353871.


Export citation