Open Access
September 2017 Selection of Tuning Parameters, Solution Paths and Standard Errors for Bayesian Lassos
Vivekananda Roy, Sounak Chakraborty
Bayesian Anal. 12(3): 753-778 (September 2017). DOI: 10.1214/16-BA1025

Abstract

Penalized regression methods such as the lasso and elastic net (EN) have become popular for simultaneous variable selection and coefficient estimation. Implementation of these methods require selection of the penalty parameters. We propose an empirical Bayes (EB) methodology for selecting these tuning parameters as well as computation of the regularization path plots. The EB method does not suffer from the “double shrinkage problem” of frequentist EN. Also it avoids the difficulty of constructing an appropriate prior on the penalty parameters. The EB methodology is implemented by efficient importance sampling method based on multiple Gibbs sampler chains. Since the Markov chains underlying the Gibbs sampler are proved to be geometrically ergodic, Markov chain central limit theorem can be used to provide asymptotically valid confidence band for profiles of EN coefficients. The practical effectiveness of our method is illustrated by several simulation examples and two real life case studies. Although this article considers lasso and EN for brevity, the proposed EB method is general and can be used to select shrinkage parameters in other regularization methods.

Citation

Download Citation

Vivekananda Roy. Sounak Chakraborty. "Selection of Tuning Parameters, Solution Paths and Standard Errors for Bayesian Lassos." Bayesian Anal. 12 (3) 753 - 778, September 2017. https://doi.org/10.1214/16-BA1025

Information

Published: September 2017
First available in Project Euclid: 7 September 2016

zbMATH: 1384.62102
MathSciNet: MR3655875
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/16-BA1025

Subjects:
Primary: 62F15 , 62J07
Secondary: 60J05

Keywords: Bayesian lasso , Elastic net , Empirical Bayes , geometric ergodicity , importance sampling , Markov chain Monte Carlo , shrinkage , standard errors

Vol.12 • No. 3 • September 2017
Back to Top