Open Access
June 2006 A one-pass sequential Monte Carlo method for Bayesian analysis of massive datasets
Suhrid Balakrishnan, David Madigan
Bayesian Anal. 1(2): 345-361 (June 2006). DOI: 10.1214/06-BA112

Abstract

For Bayesian analysis of massive data, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques often prove infeasible due to computational resource constraints. Standard MCMC methods generally require a complete scan of the dataset for each iteration. Ridgeway and Madigan (2002) and Chopin (2002b) recently presented importance sampling algorithms that combined simulations from a posterior distribution conditioned on a small portion of the dataset with a reweighting of those simulations to condition on the remainder of the dataset. While these algorithms drastically reduce the number of data accesses as compared to traditional MCMC, they still require substantially more than a single pass over the dataset. In this paper, we present "1PFS," an efficient, one-pass algorithm. The algorithm employs a simple modification of the Ridgeway and Madigan (2002) particle filtering algorithm that replaces the MCMC based "rejuvenation" step with a more efficient "shrinkage" kernel smoothing based step. To show proof-of-concept and to enable a direct comparison, we demonstrate 1PFS on the same examples presented in Ridgeway and Madigan (2002), namely a mixture model for Markov chains and Bayesian logistic regression. Our results indicate the proposed scheme delivers accurate parameter estimates while employing only a single pass through the data.

Citation

Download Citation

Suhrid Balakrishnan. David Madigan. "A one-pass sequential Monte Carlo method for Bayesian analysis of massive datasets." Bayesian Anal. 1 (2) 345 - 361, June 2006. https://doi.org/10.1214/06-BA112

Information

Published: June 2006
First available in Project Euclid: 22 June 2012

zbMATH: 1333.62007
MathSciNet: MR2221268
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/06-BA112

Keywords: Massive Datasets , One-Pass , sequential Monte Carlo

Rights: Copyright © 2006 International Society for Bayesian Analysis

Vol.1 • No. 2 • June 2006
Back to Top