The Annals of Statistics

An O'Brien-Fleming sequential trial for comparing three treatments

Rebecca A. Betensky

Full-text: Access has been disabled (more information)

Abstract

We consider a sequential procedure for comparing three treatments with the goal of ultimately selecting the best treatment. This procedure starts with a sequential test to detect an overall treatment difference and eliminates the apparently inferior treatment if this test rejects the equality of the treatments. It then proceeds with a sequential test of the remaining two treatments. We base these sequential tests on the stopping boundaries popularized by O'Brien and Fleming. Our procedure is similar in structure to that used by Siegmund in conjunction with modified repeated significance tests. We compare the performances of the two procedures via a simulation experiment. We derive analytic approximations for an error probability, the power and the expected sample size of our procedure, which we compare to simulated values. Furthermore, we propose a modification of the procedure for the comparison of a standard treatment with experimental treatments.

Article information

Source
Ann. Statist. Volume 24, Number 4 (1996), 1765-1791.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 17 September 2002

Permanent link to this document
http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aos/1032298294

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1214/aos/1032298294

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR1416659

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
1076.62545

Subjects
Primary: 62L10: Sequential analysis
Secondary: 62N10

Keywords
Repeated significance test ranking procedure boundary crossing

Citation

Betensky, Rebecca A. An O'Brien-Fleming sequential trial for comparing three treatments. Ann. Statist. 24 (1996), no. 4, 1765--1791. doi:10.1214/aos/1032298294. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aos/1032298294.


Export citation

References

  • Bechhofer, R. E., Santner, T. J. and Goldsman, D. M. (1995). Design and Analy sis of Experiments for Statistical Selection, Screening and Multiple Comparisons. Wiley, New York.
  • Betensky, R. A. (1992). A study of sequential procedures for comparing three treatments. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford Univ.
  • Betensky, R. A. (1995). Sequential analysis of censored survival data from three treatment groups. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Coronary Drug Project Research Group (1973). The Coronary Drug Project: design, methods, and baseline results. Circulation 47 1-50.
  • DeMets, D. L. and Ware, J. H. (1980). Group sequential methods for clinical trials with a onesided hy pothesis. Biometrika 67 651-660.
  • DeMets, D. L. and Ware, J. H. (1982). Asy mmetric group sequential boundaries for monitoring clinical trials. Biometrika 69 661-663.
  • Dunnett, C. W. (1955). A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 50 1096-1121.
  • Follmann, D. A., Proschan, M. A. and Geller, N. L. (1994). Monitoring pairwise comparisons in multi-armed clinical trials. Biometrics 50 325-336.
  • Hsu, J. C. and Edwards, D. G. (1983). Sequential multiple comparisons with the best. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 78 958-964.
  • Hughes, M. D. (1993). Stopping guidelines for clinical trials with multiple treatments. Statistics in Medicine 12 901-915.
  • Jennison, C., Johnstone, I. M. and Turnbull, B. W. (1982). Asy mptotically optimal procedures for sequential adaptive selection of the best of several normal means. In Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics III (S. S. Gupta and J. O. Berger, eds.) 2 55-86. Academic Press, New York.
  • Jennison, C. and Turnbull, B. W. (1991). Exact calculations for sequential t, 2 and F tests. Biometrika 78 133-141.
  • Kao, S. C. and Lai, T. L. (1980). Sequential selection procedures based on confidence sequences for normal populations. Comm. Statist. A-Theory Methods 9 1657-1676.
  • Miller, R. G., Jr. (1970). Sequential rank tests-one sample case. Proc. Sixth Berkeley Sy mp. Math. Statist. Probab. 1 97-108. Univ. California Press, Berkeley.
  • O'Brien, P. C. and Fleming, T. R. (1979). A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics 35 549-556.
  • Paulson, E. (1962). A sequential procedure for comparing several experimental categories with a standard or control. Ann. Math. Statist. 33 438-443.
  • Paulson, E. (1964). A sequential procedure for selecting the population with the largest mean from k normal populations. Ann. Math. Statist. 35 174-180.
  • Rao, C. R. (1950). Sequential tests of null hy potheses. Sanky¯a Ser. A 10 361-370.
  • Samuel-Cahn, E. (1974). Repeated significance tests II, for hy potheses about the normal distribution. Comm. Statist. A-Theory Methods 3 711-733.
  • Siegmund, D. (1985). Sequential Analy sis: Tests and Confidence Intervals. Springer, New York.
  • Siegmund, D. (1986). Boundary crossing probabilities and statistical applications. Ann. Statist. 14 361-404.
  • Siegmund, D. (1993). A sequential clinical trial for comparing three treatments. Ann. Statist. 21 464-483.
  • Wald, A. (1947). Sequential Analy sis. Wiley, New York.
  • Woodroofe, M. (1978). Large deviations of the likelihood ratio statistic with applications to sequential testing. Ann. Statist. 6 72-84.
  • Woodroofe, M. (1986). Very weak expansions for sequential confidence levels. Ann. Statist. 14 1049-1067.
  • Woodroofe, M. (1989). Very weak expansions for sequentially designed experiments: linear models. Ann. Statist. 17 1087-1102.
  • Woodroofe, M. and Coad, D. S. (1995). Corrected confidence sets for sequentially designed experiments. Unpublished manuscript.