Project Euclid

References

• Albert, R., Jeong, H. and Barabási, A.-L. (2000). Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 406 378–382.
• Auslender, A. and Teboulle, M. (2006). Interior gradient and proximal methods for convex and conic optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 16 697–725 (electronic).
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1113.90118
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1137/S1052623403427823
  
• Barabási, A.-L. and Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286 509–512.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1226.05223
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509
  
• Beck, A. and Teboulle, M. (2009). Gradient-based algorithms with applications to signal recovery. Convex Optim. Signal Process. Commun. 42–88.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1211.90290
  
• Boyd, S., Parikh, N., Chu, E., Peleato, B. and Eckstein, J. (2011). Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 3 1–122.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1229.90122
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1561/2200000016
  
• Chen, X., Slack, F. J. and Zhao, H. (2013). Joint analysis of expression profiles from multiple cancers improves the identification of microRNA–gene interactions. Bioinformatics 29 2137–2145.
• Chen, S., Witten, D. M. and Shojaie, A. (2015). Selection and estimation for mixed graphical models. Biometrika 102 47–64.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR3335095
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1345.62081
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1093/biomet/asu051
  
• Cheng, J., Levina, E. and Zhu, J. (2013). High-dimensional mixed graphical models. Preprint. Available at arXiv:1304.2810.
  arXiv: arXiv:1304.2810
  
• Chun, H., Chen, M., Li, B. and Zhao, H. (2013). Joint conditional Gaussian graphical models with multiple sources of genomic data. Front. Genet. 4 Article ID 294. DOI:10.3389/fgene.2013.00294.
• Ciriello, G., Miller, M. L., Aksoy, B. A., Senbabaoglu, Y., Schultz, N. and Sander, C. (2013). Emerging landscape of oncogenic signatures across human cancers. Nat. Genet. 45 1127–1133.
• Danaher, P., Wang, P. and Witten, D. M. (2013). The joint graphical lasso for inverse covariance estimation across multiple classes. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 76 373–397.
• Fellinghauer, B., Bühlmann, P., Ryffel, M., von Rhein, M. and Reinhardt, J. D. (2013). Stable graphical model estimation with random forests for discrete, continuous, and mixed variables. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 64 132–152.
• Feng, Z., Zhang, H., Levine, A. J. and Jin, S. (2005). The coordinate regulation of the p53 and mTOR pathways in cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 8204–8209.
• Friedman, J., Hastie, T. and Tibshirani, R. (2008). Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics 9 432–441.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1143.62076
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxm045
  
• Friedman, J., Hastie, T. and Tibshirani, R. (2009). Glmnet: Lasso and elastic-net regularized generalized linear models. R Package Version 1.
• Friedman, J., Hastie, T. and Tibshirani, R. (2010). A note on the group lasso and a sparse group lasso. Technical report, Dept. Statistics, Stanford Univ., Stanford.
• Ge, H., Walhout, A. J. and Vidal, M. (2003). Integrating ‘omic’ information: A bridge between genomics and systems biology. Trends Genet. 19 551–560.
• Govindan, R. and Tangmunarunkit, H. (2000). Heuristics for Internet map discovery. In Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies 3 1371–1380. IEEE, New York.
• Guo, J., Levina, E., Michailidis, G. and Zhu, J. (2010). Joint structure estimation for categorical Markov networks. Technical report, Dept. Statistics, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
• Guo, J., Levina, E., Michailidis, G. and Zhu, J. (2011). Joint estimation of multiple graphical models. Biometrika 98 1–15.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2804206
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1214.62058
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1093/biomet/asq060
  
• Hawkins, R. D., Hon, G. C. and Ren, B. (2010). Next-generation genomics: An integrative approach. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11 476–486.
• Hecker, M., Lambeck, S., Toepfer, S., van Someren, E. and Guthke, R. (2009). Gene regulatory network inference: Data integration in dynamic models—A review. Biosystems 96 86–103.
• Hestenes, M. R. (1969). Multiplier and gradient methods. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 4 303–320.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR271809
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0174.20705
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/BF00927673
  
• Hoefling, H. (2010). A path algorithm for the fused lasso signal approximator. J. Comput. Graph. Statist. 19 984–1006. Supplementary materials available online.
• Höfling, H. and Tibshirani, R. (2009). Estimation of sparse binary pairwise Markov networks using pseudo-likelihoods. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 10 883–906.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2505138
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1245.62121
  
• Jeong, H., Mason, S. P., Barabási, A-L. and Oltvai, Z. N. (2001). Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411 41–42.
• Joyce, A. R. and Palsson, B. Ø. (2006). The model organism as a system: Integrating “omics” data sets. Nat. Rev., Mol. Cell Biol. 7 198–210.
• Lauritzen, S. L. (1996). Graphical Models. Oxford Statistical Science Series 17. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
• Lee, J. D. and Hastie, T. J. (2012). Learning mixed graphical models. Preprint. Available at arXiv:1205.5012.
  arXiv: arXiv:1205.5012
  
• Li, B., Chun, H. and Zhao, H. (2012). Sparse estimation of conditional graphical models with application to gene networks. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 107 152–167.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1261.62049
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1080/01621459.2011.644498
  
• Mazumder, R. and Hastie, T. (2012). Exact covariance thresholding into connected components for large-scale graphical lasso. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 13 781–794.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1283.62148
  
• Meinshausen, N. and Bühlmann, P. (2006). High-dimensional graphs and variable selection with the lasso. Ann. Statist. 34 1436–1462.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2278363
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1113.62082
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/009053606000000281
  Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1152540754
  
• Myers, C. L. and Troyanskaya, O. G. (2007). Context-sensitive data integration and prediction of biological networks. Bioinformatics 23 2322–2330.
• Myers, C. L., Robson, D., Wible, A., Hibbs, M. A., Chiriac, C., Theesfeld, C. L., Dolinski, K. and Troyanskaya, O. G. (2005). Discovery of biological networks from diverse functional genomic data. Genome Biol. 6 Article ID R114. DOI:10.1186/gb-2005-6-13-r114.
• Myers, C. L., Barrett, D. R., Hibbs, M. A., Huttenhower, C. and Troyanskaya, O. G. (2006). Finding function: Evaluation methods for functional genomic data. BMC Genomics 7 187.
• Network, C. G. A. et al. (2012). Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490 61–70.
• Newman, M. E. J. (2006). Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. Phys. Rev. E (3) 74 Article ID 036104.
• Ouyang, Z., Zhou, Q. and Wong, W. H. (2009). ChIP-Seq of transcription factors predicts absolute and differential gene expression in embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 21521–21526.
• Peng, J., Zhou, N. and Zhu, J. (2009). Partial correlation estimation by joint sparse regression models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 104 735–746.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2541591
  Zentralblatt MATH: 06441092
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1198/jasa.2009.0126
  
• Ravikumar, P., Wainwright, M. J. and Lafferty, J. D. (2010). High-dimensional Ising model selection using $\ell_{1}$-regularized logistic regression. Ann. Statist. 38 1287–1319.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2662343
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1189.62115
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/09-AOS691
  Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1268056617
  
• Ritchie, M. D., Holzinger, E. R., Li, R., Pendergrass, S. A. and Kim, D. (2015). Methods of integrating data to uncover genotype-phenotype interactions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16 85–97.
• Shen, K. and Tseng, G. C. (2010). Meta-analysis for pathway enrichment analysis when combining multiple genomic studies. Bioinformatics 26 1316–1323.
• Tomczak, K., Czerwińska, P. and Wiznerowicz, M. (2015). The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA): An immeasurable source of knowledge. Contemp. Oncol. 19 A68–A77.
• Troyanskaya, O. G., Dolinski, K., Owen, A. B., Altman, R. B. and Botstein, D. (2003). A Bayesian framework for combining heterogeneous data sources for gene function prediction (in Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 8348–8353.
• Varambally, S., Yu, J., Laxman, B., Rhodes, D. R., Mehra, R., Tomlins, S. A., Shah, R. B., Chandran, U., Monzon, F. A., Becich, M. J. et al. (2005). Integrative genomic and proteomic analysis of prostate cancer reveals signatures of metastatic progression. Cancer Cell 8 393–406.
• Witten, D. M., Friedman, J. H. and Simon, N. (2011). New insights and faster computations for the graphical lasso. J. Comput. Graph. Statist. 20 892–900.
• Yang, E., Ravikumar, P., Allen, G. I. and Liu, Z. (2013). On graphical models via univariate exponential family distributions. Preprint. Available at arXiv:1301.4183.
  arXiv: arXiv:1301.4183
  
• Yin, J. and Li, H. (2011). A sparse conditional Gaussian graphical model for analysis of genetical genomics data. Ann. Appl. Stat. 5 2630–2650.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1234.62151
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/11-AOAS494
  
• Yook, S.-H., Oltvai, Z. N. and Barabási, A.-L. (2004). Functional and topological characterization of protein interaction networks. Proteomics 4 928–942.
• Yuan, M. and Lin, Y. (2006). Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 68 49–67.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1141.62030
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00532.x
  
• Zhang, Y., Ouyang, Z. and Zhao, H. (2017). Supplement to “A statistical framework for data integration through graphical models with application to cancer genomics.” DOI:10.1214/16-AOAS998SUPP.