The Annals of Applied Statistics

Modelling individual migration patterns using a Bayesian nonparametric approach for capture–recapture data

Eleni Matechou and François Caron

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected) We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text

Abstract

We present a Bayesian nonparametric approach for modelling wildlife migration patterns using capture–recapture (CR) data. Arrival times of individuals are modelled in continuous time and assumed to be drawn from a Poisson process with unknown intensity function, which is modelled via a flexible nonparametric mixture model. The proposed CR framework allows us to estimate the following: (i) the total number of individuals that arrived at the site, (ii) their times of arrival and departure, and hence their stopover duration, and (iii) the density of arrival times, providing a smooth representation of the arrival pattern of the individuals at the site. We apply the model to data on breeding great crested newts (Triturus cristatus) and on migrating reed warblers (Acrocephalus scirpaceus). For the former, the results demonstrate the staggered arrival of individuals at the breeding ponds and suggest that males tend to arrive earlier than females. For the latter, they demonstrate the arrival of migrating flocks at the stopover site and highlight the considerable difference in stopover duration between caught and not-caught individuals.

Article information

Source
Ann. Appl. Stat. Volume 11, Number 1 (2017), 21-40.

Dates
Received: November 2015
Revised: June 2016
First available in Project Euclid: 8 April 2017

Permanent link to this document
http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoas/1491616870

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1214/16-AOAS989

Keywords
Chinese restaurant process great crested newts Poisson–Gamma process reed warblers shot-noise Cox process stopover data

Citation

Matechou, Eleni; Caron, François. Modelling individual migration patterns using a Bayesian nonparametric approach for capture–recapture data. Ann. Appl. Stat. 11 (2017), no. 1, 21--40. doi:10.1214/16-AOAS989. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoas/1491616870.


Export citation

References

  • Basu, S. (1998). Capture–recapture and nonparametric Bayes. Technical report, Division of Statistics, Northern Illinois Univ., DeKalb, IL.
  • Basu, S. and Ebrahimi, N. (2001). Bayesian capture–recapture methods for error detection and estimation of population size: Heterogeneity and dependence. Biometrika 88 269–279.
  • Bauer, S., Van Dinther, M., Høgda, K.-A., Klaassen, M. and Madsen, J. (2008). The consequences of climate-driven stop-over sites changes on migration schedules and fitness of Arctic geese. J. Anim. Ecol. 77 654–660.
  • Besbeas, P., Freeman, S. N., Morgan, B. J. T. and Catchpole, E. A. (2002). Integrating mark–recapture-recovery and census data to estimate animal abundance and demographic parameters. Biometrics 58 540–547.
  • Both, C., Van Turnhout, C. A., Bijlsma, R. G., Siepel, H., Van Strien, A. J. and Foppen, R. P. (2009). Avian population consequences of climate change are most severe for long-distance migrants in seasonal habitats. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B Biol. Sci. 277 1259–1266.
  • Brix, A. (1999). Generalized gamma measures and shot-noise Cox processes. Adv. in Appl. Probab. 31 929–953.
  • Brix, A. and Diggle, P. J. (2001). Spatiotemporal prediction for log-Gaussian Cox processes. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 63 823–841.
  • Charmantier, A. and Gienapp, P. (2014). Climate change and timing of avian breeding and migration: Evolutionary versus plastic changes. Evol. Appl. 7 15–28.
  • Cormack, R. (1964). Estimates of survival from the sighting of marked animals. Biometrika 51 429–438.
  • Daley, D. J. and Vere-Jones, D. (2003). An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes. Vol. I: Elementary Theory and Methods, Springer, New York.
  • Dorazio, R. M., Mukherjee, B., Zhang, L., Ghosh, M., Jelks, H. L. and Jordan, F. (2008). Modeling unobserved sources of heterogeneity in animal abundance using a Dirichlet process prior. Biometrics 64 635–644, 670–671.
  • Erni, B., Liechti, F., Underhill, L. G. and Bruderer, B. (2002). Wind and rain govern the intensity of nocturnal bird migration in central Europe: A log-linear regression analysis. Ardea 90 155–166.
  • Ferguson, T. S. (1973). A Bayesian analysis of some nonparametric problems. Ann. Statist. 1 209–230.
  • Gilbert, S. L., Lindberg, M. S., Hundertmark, K. J. and Person, D. K. (2014). Dead before detection: Addressing the effects of left truncation on survival estimation and ecological inference for neonates. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5 992–1001.
  • Green, P. J. (1995). Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika 82 711–732.
  • Ishwaran, H. and James, L. F. (2004). Computational methods for multiplicative intensity models using weighted gamma processes: Proportional hazards, marked point processes, and panel count data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 99 175–190.
  • Jehle, R., Thiesmeier, B. and Foster, J. (2011). The Crested Newt: A Dwindling Pond-Dweller. Laurenti, Bielefeld.
  • Jolly, G. M. (1965). Explicit estimates from capture–recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model. Biometrika 52 225–247.
  • Kingman, J. F. C. (1993). Poisson Processes. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
  • Kottas, A. and Sansó, B. (2007). Bayesian mixture modeling for spatial Poisson process intensities, with applications to extreme value analysis. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 137 3151–3163.
  • Kovács, S., Fehérvári, P., Nagy, K., Harnos, A. and Csörgő, T. (2012). Changes in migration phenology and biometrical traits of reed, marsh and sedge warblers. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 7 115–125.
  • Kuo, L. and Ghosh, S. K. (1997). Bayesian nonparametric inference for nonhomogeneous Poisson processes. Technical report, Dept. Statistics, Univ. Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
  • Lebreton, J.-D., Burnham, K. P., Clobert, J. and Anderson, D. R. (1992). Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: A unified approach with case studies. Ecol. Monogr. 62 67–118.
  • Lewis, B. (2012). An evaluation of mitigation actions for great crested newts at development sites. Ph.D. thesis, Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology & Conservation, University of Kent.
  • Lo, A. Y. and Weng, C.-S. (1989). On a class of Bayesian nonparametric estimates. II. Hazard rate estimates. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 41 227–245.
  • Lyons, J. E., Kendall, W. L., Royle, J. A., Converse, S. J., Andres, B. A. and Buchanan, J. B. (2016). Population size and stopover duration estimation using mark-resight data and Bayesian analysis of a superpopulation model. Biometrics 72 262–271.
  • MacEachern, S. N. (1999). Dependent nonparametric processes. In ASA Proceedings of the Section on Bayesian Statistical Science 50–55. Amer. Statist. Assoc., Alexandria, Virginia.
  • Manrique-Vallier, D. (2016). Bayesian population size estimation using Dirichlet process mixtures. Biometrics. DOI:10.1111/biom.12502.
  • Matechou, E. and Caron, F. (2017a). Supplement to “Modelling individual migration patterns using a Bayesian nonparametric approach for capture–recapture data”. DOI:10.1214/16-AOAS989SUPPA.
  • Matechou, E. and Caron, F. (2017b). Supplement to “Modelling individual migration patterns using a Bayesian nonparametric approach for capture–recapture data”. DOI:10.1214/16-AOAS989SUPPB.
  • Matechou, E., Morgan, B. J. T., Pledger, S., Collazo, J. A. and Lyons, J. E. (2013a). Integrated analysis of capture–recapture-resighting data and counts of unmarked birds at stop-over sites. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 18 120–135.
  • Matechou, E., Pledger, S., Efford, M., Morgan, B. J. T. and Thomson, D. L. (2013b). Estimating age-specific survival when age is unknown: Open population capture–recapture models with age structure and heterogeneity. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4 654–664.
  • McClintock, B. T., Bailey, L. L., Dreher, B. P. and Link, W. A. (2014). Probit models for capture–recapture data subject to imperfect detection, individual heterogeneity and misidentification. Ann. Appl. Stat. 8 2461–2484.
  • McCrea, R. S., Morgan, B. J. T., Gimenez, O., Besbeas, P., Lebreton, J.-D. and Bregnballe, T. (2010). Multi-site integrated population modelling. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 15 539–561.
  • Møller, J. (2003). Shot noise Cox processes. Adv. in Appl. Probab. 35 614–640.
  • Møller, J., Syversveen, A. R. and Waagepetersen, R. P. (1998). Log Gaussian Cox processes. Scand. J. Stat. 25 451–482.
  • Møller, J. and Waagepetersen, R. P. (2003). Statistical Inference and Simulation for Spatial Point Processes. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 100. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
  • Nieto-Barajas, L. E. and Walker, S. G. (2004). Bayesian nonparametric survival analysis via Lévy driven Markov processes. Statist. Sinica 14 1127–1146.
  • Pitman, J. (1996). Some developments of the Blackwell–MacQueen urn scheme. In Statistics, Probability and Game Theory. Institute of Mathematical Statistics Lecture Notes—Monograph Series 30 245–267. IMS, Hayward, CA.
  • Pledger, S., Efford, M., Pollock, K. H., Collazo, J. A. and Lyons, J. E. (2009). Stopover duration analysis with departure probability dependent on unknown time since arrival. In Modeling Demographic Processes in Marked Populations (D. L. Thomson, E. G. Cooch and M. J. Conroy, eds.). Environmental and Ecological Statistics 3 349–363.
  • Plummer, M., Best, N., Cowles, K. and Vines, K. (2006). Coda: Convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC. R News 6 7–11.
  • Pradel, R. (1996). Utilization of capture–mark–recapture for the study of recruitment and population growth rate. Biometrics 52 703–709.
  • Rocchetti, I., Bunge, J. and Böhning, D. (2011). Population size estimation based upon ratios of recapture probabilities. Ann. Appl. Stat. 5 1512–1533.
  • Royle, J. A., Dorazio, R. M. and Link, W. A. (2007). Analysis of multinomial models with unknown index using data augmentation. J. Comput. Graph. Statist. 16 67–85.
  • Royle, J. A. and Young, K. V. (2008). A hierarchical model for spatial capture–recapture data. Ecology 89 2281–2289.
  • Royle, J. A., Karanth, K. U., Gopalaswamy, A. M. and Kumar, N. S. (2009). Bayesian inference in camera trapping studies for a class of spatial capture–recapture models. Ecology 90 3233–3244.
  • Schaub, M., Liechti, F. and Jenni, L. (2004). Departure of migrating European robins, Erithacus rubecula, from a stopover site in relation to wind and rain. Anim. Behav. 67 229–237.
  • Schaub, M., Pradel, R., Jenni, L. and Lebreton, J.-D. (2001). Migrating birds stop over longer than usually thought: An improved capture–recapture analysis. Ecology 82 852–859.
  • Schwarz, C. J. and Arnason, A. N. (1996). A general methodology for the analysis of capture–recapture experiments in open populations. Biometrics 52 860–873.
  • Seber, G. A. F. (1965). A note on the multiple-recapture census. Biometrika 52 249–259.
  • Seebacher, F. and Post, E. (2015). Climate change impacts on animal migration. Clim. Change Responses 2 1.
  • Sethuraman, J. (1994). A constructive definition of Dirichlet priors. Statist. Sinica 4 639–650.
  • Sullivan, A. R., Flaspohler, D. J., Froese, R. E. and Ford, D. (2015). Climate variability and the timing of spring raptor migration in eastern North America. J. Avian Biol. 47 208–218.
  • Taddy, M. A. and Kottas, A. (2012). Mixture modeling for marked Poisson processes. Bayesian Anal. 7 335–361.
  • R Core Team (2014). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  • Van Buskirk, J., Mulvihill, R. S. and Leberman, R. C. (2009). Variable shifts in spring and autumn migration phenology in North American songbirds associated with climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 15 760–771.
  • Wolpert, R. L. and Ickstadt, K. (1998). Poisson/gamma random field models for spatial statistics. Biometrika 85 251–267.

Supplemental materials

  • Supplement article. We provide details on an MCMC algorithm for the model presented in this paper, convergence diagnostics, and a comparison of results obtained using existing models for both case studies and a sensitivity analysis to prior distributions specified for several parameters.
  • Code and data. The reed warbler data and code to fit the model presented in the paper to the data.